Cultures of Trust and Alienation in the Situation of Post-modernism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.48.01Keywords:
social trust, social capital, alienation, social anomie, islands of trust, vectors of persons’ activity, postmodernismAbstract
In the article the reasons of activation of study of the social trust phenomenon as a key element of social capital are analyzed; tree historical phases of the development of culture of trust and at the same time three forms of it’s real existence in the modern society – low, middle and high – and the influence of each of these forms of trust on the development of the social capital in the situation of post-modernism are considered. Transformation of culture of trust is shown as a process deeply connected to the overcoming of alienation and anomie. The first form – conditional trust – leads to the fast growth of the material assets of the society and at the same time is stimulating the growth of alienation. The middle level of trust becomes the way of compensation of the mutual irresponsibility through the activation of social initiatives and at the same time leads to the emergence of “islands of trust”; between them the territories of distrust are becoming wider, which leads to the growth of fears, concerns about security. The third – high – form of culture of trust, which is the basis of the responsible activity, is gradually taking shape as a mindset of a free-from-alienation person, who wants to take part in the polyphonic life of modern society, in it’s multi-vector development, in the overcoming of crisis situations emerging in it, acting on behalf of himself, his group and the whole humanity simultaneously.
References
Bachmann R. (2001), Trust, Power and Control in Transorganizational Relations, „Organization Studies”, Vol. 22, No. 2, s. 337‒365.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222007
Beck U., Giddens А., Lash S. (2009), Modernizacja refleksyjna. Polityka, tradycja i estetyka w porządku społecznym nowoczesności, [tłum. Jacek Konieczny], Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Bourdieu Р. (1996), State nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, Polity Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503615427
Czapiński J., Panek T. (red.) (2007), Diagnoza społeczna 2007. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków, www.diagnoza.com/files/diagnoza2007/raport_11.11.2007.pdf, 09.07.2010.
Google Scholar
Czapiński J., Panek T. (red.) (2009), Diagnoza społeczna 2009. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków, www.analizy.mpips.gov.pl/images/stories/publ_i_raporty, 09.07.2010.
Google Scholar
F u k u y a m a Y. F. (1997), Zaufanie: kapitał społeczny a droga do dobrobytu, [przekł. z ang. Anna i Leszek Śliwa], Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa–Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Fukuyama Y. F. (2000), Koniec historii, [przekł. z ang. Tomasz Bieroń, Marek Wichrowski], Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Goffman E. (2010), Analiza ramowa, [tłum. Stanisław Burdziej], Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Hardin R. (2009), Zaufanie, [przekł. z ang. Agnieszka Gruba], Wydawnictwo Sic!, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Jenkins C. (1986), Foundation Funding of Progressive Social Movements, [w:] The ers Guide, J. Shellow, N. Stella (eds.), Moyer-Bell, Mt. Kisco 1986, s. 1‒13.
Google Scholar
Клеман K. (2009), От «обывателей» к «активистам». Условия «рефрейминга» // «Как люди делают себя» (Рефрейминг как механизм формирования групповой идентификации). Исследовательский проект на 2007–08, Е. Даниловой (под рук.), Институт Социологии Российской Академии Наук, Москва.
Google Scholar
Kozlova O., Izdebska K. (red.) (2013), Cultures of Trust, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Minerwa, Szczecin.
Google Scholar
Lane F. C., Riemersma J. (eds.) (1953), Enterprise and Secular Change: Readings in Economic History, Allen and Unwin, London (quoted in „Accounting and rationality”).
Google Scholar
Marks K. (2002), Kapitał ‒ Krytyka ekonomii politycznej, Tom pierwszy ‒ Księga I Proces wytwarzania kapitału, Polska Sekcja MIA, http://www.marxists.org/polski/marks-engels/1867/ kapital/index.htm, 11.05.2012.
Google Scholar
Патрушев С (2007), Научный доклад (II). Социальные сети доверия, массовые движения и институты политического представительства в современной России: опыт „старых” и „новых” демократий в условиях глобализации, Российский Государственный Научной Фонд, Институт Социологии РАН, Центр Политологии и Политической Социологии, Отдел Сравнительных Политических Исследований, Москва, http://www.isras.ru/seti_doveria.html, 12.03.2010.
Google Scholar
Putnam R. D. (ed.) (2002), Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195150899.001.0001
Розанов В. В. (1990), Сумерки просвещения, Педагогика, Москва.
Google Scholar
Rydgren J. (2009), Social Isolation? Social Capital and Radical Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe, „Journal of Civil Society” 2009, September, Vol. 5, Issue 2, s. 129‒150.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680903154915
Sennett R. (2007), Korozja charakteru. Osobiste konsekwencje pracy w nowym kapitalizmie, [tłum. z ang. Jan Dzierzgowski, Łukasz Mikołajewski], ser. „Spectrum”, Wydawnictwo Literackie MUZA, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Sztompka P. (2007), Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

