Biomedicalization and genetic enhancement of man ‒ in the context of bioethical analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.45.08Keywords:
biomedicalization, genetic enhancement, modern reproductive technologies, germline genetic modificationAbstract
Biotechnologization of man, including genetic enhancements that will be discussed by the authors, is advertised by the scientists as offering a broad range of biomedical benefits; at the same time, however, it undoubtedly raises a number of ethical and legal problems. These include controversies over the necessity of carrying out such research, its direction and prognosis of the development of biotechnology and biomedical sciences. Moreover, the methods used in these sciences and a control over them seem to be controversial. Doubts surrounding the necessity and moral as well as legal consequences of potential biomedicalization of human life is best exemplified by numerous discussions that take place all over the world. Aware of the number of problems related to biomedicalization and of their complexity, the authors will initially focus on a more detailed analysis of biomedicalization at the early stage of human life and will then present the possibilities that genetic engineering offers even today, which might subsequently lead to genetic enhancements. The authors will finish by analysing from a bioethical standpoint moral dilemmas that might result from implementing such improvements.
References
Bailey R. (2005), Liberation biology. The Scientific and Moral Case for the Biotech Revolution, Prometheus Books, New York
Google Scholar
Billings P. R., Hubbard R., Newman S. A. (1999), Human germline gene modification: A dissent, „The Lancet”, Vol. 9167, No. 353, s. 1873‒1875
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01173-3
Borenstein J. (2009), The Wisdom of Caution: Genetic Enhancement and Future Children, „Science and Engineering Ethics”, Vol. 15, s. 517‒530
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9183-9
Bostrom N. (2003), Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective, „Journal of Value Inquiry”, Vol. 37, No. 4, s. 493‒506.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INQU.0000019037.67783.d5
Chyrowicz B. (2004), Spór o poprawianie ludzkiej natury, [w:] Etyka i technika w poszukiwaniu ludzkiej doskonałości, B. Chyrowicz (red.), Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, Lublin, s. 47‒61
Google Scholar
Etieyibo E. (2011), Genetic enhancement, social justice, and welfare-oriented patterns of distribution, „Bioethics”, Vol. 26, Issue 6, s. 296‒304
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01872.x
Fukuyama F. (2004), Koniec człowieka. Konsekwencje rewolucji biotechnologicznej, [przekł. z ang. B. Pietrzyk], Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków
Google Scholar
Glover J. (1984), What Sort of People Should There Be?, Pelican Books, New York
Google Scholar
Gunderson M. (2008), Genetic Engineering and the Consent of Future Persons, „Journal of Evolution and Technology”, Vol. 18, Issue 1, s. 86‒93
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2007.1525
Habermas J. (2003), Przyszłość natury ludzkiej: czy zmierzamy do eugeniki liberalnej?, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa
Google Scholar
Handyside A. H. (2000), Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, „Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology”, Vol. 10, s. 127‒132.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/cuog.2000.0133
Hanlon M. (2001), World’s first GM babies born, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-43767/Worlds-GM-babies-born.html, 25.02.2013
Google Scholar
Hołub G. (2008), Godność człowieka a biotechnologia, [w:] Ku rozumieniu godności człowieka, G. Hołub, P. Duchliński (red.), Wydawnictwo Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej, Kraków, s. 299‒332
Google Scholar
Kass L. (1985), Toward a More Natural Science, Free Press, New York
Google Scholar
Kass L. (2002), Life, Liberty, and Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethic, Encounter Books, San Francisco
Google Scholar
Kraj T. (2010), Granice genetycznego udoskonalenia człowieka, Wydawnictwo Św. Stanisława BM, Kraków
Google Scholar
Latour B. (2003), Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Mancuso K., Hauswirth W. W., Li Q., Connor T. B., Kuchenbecker J. A., Mauck M. C. et al. (2009), Gene therapy for red-green color blindness in adult primates, „Nature”, Vol. 7265, No. 461, s. 784‒787
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08401
McConnell T. (2011), Genetic intervention and the parent-child relationship, „Genomics, Society and Policy”, Vol. 6, No. 3, s. 1‒14
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-6-3-1
Miah A. (2009), Medicalization, Biomedicalization, or Biotechnologization? Biocultural Capital and a New Social Order, „Salute e Società / Health and Society” (Italian), special ed. „The Medicalization of Life”, Vol. 8, No. 2, (dual published in Italian, p. 264‒267), s. 248‒251
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SES2009-EN2016
Nijakowski L. M. (2009), Biowładza w późnej nowoczesności, [w:] Wiedza ‒ władza. Studium nad wiedzą, J. Szymczyk, M. Zemło, A. Jabłoński (red.), Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, Lublin, s. 107‒125.
Google Scholar
Nowak J. (2004), Szanse i zagrożenia diagnostyki molekularnej, terapii genowej oraz klonowania komórek i organizmów, „Dental Forum”, nr 1, s. 11‒16
Google Scholar
Plotz D. (2007), Fabryka Geniuszów. Niezwykła historia banku spermy noblistów, [przekł. A. Wyszogrodzka-Gaik], Świat Książki, Warszawa
Google Scholar
Rare condition gives toddler super strength (2007), Associated Press, http://www.ctvnews.ca/rarecondition-gives-toddler-super-strength-1.243163, 22.02.2013
Google Scholar
Resnik D. B., Vorhaus D. B. (2006), Genetic modification and genetic determinism, „Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicin”, s. 1‒9.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9
Robertson J. (1994), Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies, Princeton University Press, Princeton
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821204
Routtenberg A., Cantallops I., Zaffuto S., Serrano P., Namgung U. (2000), Enhanced learning after genetic overexpression of a brain growth protein, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America”, Vol. 97, No. 13, s. 7657‒7662
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.13.7657
Sade R. M., Khushf G. (1998), Gene therapy: ethical and social issues, „Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association”, Vol. 94, No. 9, s. 406‒410
Google Scholar
Sandel M. (2004), The case against perfection, „The Atlantic Monthly”, April, s. 51‒61.
Google Scholar
Savulescu J. (2002), Deaf lesbians, “designer disability” and the future of medicine, „British Medical Journal”, October, Vol. 73675, No. 325, s. 771‒773
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7367.771
Schuelke M., Wagner K. R., Stolz L. E., Hubner C., Riebel T., Komen W. et al. (2004), Myostatin mutation associated with gross muscle hypertrophy in a child, „New England Journal of Medicine”, Vol. 350, No. 26, s. 2682‒2688
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040933
Scott J. A. (2006), Inheritable genetic modification: clinical applications and genetic counseling considerations, [w:] In The Ethics of Inheritable Genetic Modification: A Dividing Line, J. Rasko, G. O’Sullivan, R. Ankeny (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 223‒242
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584275.013
Stock G. (2003), Redesigning humans: Choosing our genes, changing our future, Mariner Books, New York
Google Scholar
Zacher L. (2007), Transformacje społeczeństw, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

