Queens in the shadow of kings – sociological notes on the historical process of women’s discrimination and emancipation in chess

Jakub Ryszard Stempień

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.75.05

Authors

Jakub Ryszard Stempień Department of Rural and Urban Sociology, Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Łódź, ul. Rewolucji 1905 r. 41/43, 90-214 Łódź https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-4823

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.75.05

Keywords:

chess, sport, discrimination against women in sport

Abstract

The article concerns the unequal position of men and women in chess. This inequality is currently manifested in the male-dominated population of chess players, gender determined differences in the game level attained, and financial discrimination. Historical analysis shows that over the centuries chess has been regarded as a pastime suitable for both men and women. It was only the process of institutionalization of chess as a sport (and turning it into serious leisure activity, in R. Stebbins’ typology), which took place in the era of industrial society, that discrimination against women in chess came about. The emancipatory activities of women in this field, dating back to the second half of the 19th century, were commented on in the chess press in two ways, which are referred to in the text as the “Steinitz narrative” and the “de Coubertin narrative”. Both of these perspectives have remained resilient to this day, accompanying the progress in equalizing the position of men and women in chess that were seen in the 20th and 21st centuries.

References

90th FIDE Congress (2020), 90th FIDE Congress: Executive Board Minutes and Annexes, https://www.fide.com/fide/documents/438 (accessed 15.04.2020).

Baccellieri E. (2019), Long Live the Queen, “Sports Illustrated”, 14th January, pp. 58–62.

Bilalić M., Smallbone K., McLeod P., Gobet F. (2009), Why Are (the best) Women so Good at Chess? Participation Rates and Gender Differences in Intellectual Domains, “Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences”, vol. 276, no. 1659, pp. 1161–1165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1576

Blanch A. (2016), Expert Performance of Men And Women: A Cross-cultural Study in the Chess Domain, “Personality and Individual Differences”, vol. 101, pp. 90–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.050

Brasó-Rius J. (2016), Los inicios de la mujer en la práctica del ajedrez en España (1922–1935), “Investigaciones Feministas”, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 331–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.51750

Bubczyk R. (2018), Średniowieczna gra w szachy – intelektualna rozrywka elit i narzędzie seksualnej rywalizacji płci, “Średniowiecze Polskie i Powszechne”, vol. 10(14), pp. 130–143.

Charness N., Gerchak Y. (1996), Participation Rates And Maximal Performance: A Log-Linear Explanation for Group Differences, Such as Russian and Male Dominance in Chess, “Psychological Science”, vol. 7, pp. 46–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00665.x

Cierpiał-Wolan M. (supervisor) (2017), Physical education in Poland in the years 2015 and 2016, Central Statistical Office, Warszawa–Rzeszów.

Cierpiał-Wolan M. (supervisor) (2019), Physical education in Poland in the years 2017 and 2018, Central Statistical Office, Warszawa–Rzeszów.

DeFrantz A.L. (1997), The Changing role of Women in the Olympic Games, “Olympic Review”, vol. 26, no.15, pp. 18–21.

Dimitrova L. (2015), Comparative Analysis of the Chess Olympiad Trends, “Activities in Physical Education and Sport”, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 197–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2014.940807

Donner J.H. (2006), The King: Chess pieces, New in Chess, Alkmaar.

Doughan D., Gordon P. (2006), Women, Clubs and Associations in Britain, Routledge, London–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029015

Gawlikowski S. (1976), Walka o tron szachowy, Sport i Turystyka, Warszawa.

Gawlikowski S. (1978), Olimpiady szachowe 1924–1974, Sport i Turystyka, Warszawa.

Giulianotti R. (2005), Prologue, [in:] R. Giulianotti, Sport: A Critical Sociology, Polity Press, Cambridge–Malden.

Giżycki J. (1984), Z szachami przez wieki i kraje, Sport i Turystyka, Warszawa.

Hoffman P. (2003), Chess Queen, “Smithsonian”, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 72–79.

Kasparov G. (2017), Deep Thinking. Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins, PublicAffairs, New York.

Kobiela F. (2018), Should Chess and Other Mind Sports be Regarded as Sports?, “Journal of the Philosophy of Sport”, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 279–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2018.1520125

Lipoński W. (1987), Humanistyczna encyklopedia sportu, Sport i Turystyka, Warszawa.

Litmanowicz M. (2005), Moja przygoda z szachami, Wydawnictwo Penelopa, Warszawa.

Litmanowicz W., Giżycki J. (1986), Szachy od A do Z, Sport i Turystyka, Warszawa.

Maass A., D’Ettole C., Cadinu M. (2008), Checkmate? The role of Gender Stereotypes in the Ultimate Intellectual Sport, “European Journal of Social Psychology”, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 231–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.440

Maric A. (2007), Chess, Education and the Olympic Movement, [in:] K. Georgiadis (ed.), 7th International Session for Educators and Officials of Higher Institutes of Physical Education 2006 – proceedings: Ancient Olympia, International Olympic Academy and the International Olympic Committee, Athens.

Sharples J. (2015), “I am a chess-player”: Respectability in Literary and Urban Space, 1840–1851, “Sport in History”, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 296–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460263.2015.1023825

Sołtysiak M. (2014), Archeologia szachów. Przyczynek do badania zmian kulturowych dotyczących pozycji kobiet w średniowieczu, na przykładzie transformacji figury wezyra w królową, “Homo Ludens”, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 153–170.

Stebbins R.A. (1992), Amateurs, Professionals and Serious Leisure, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.

Stebbins R.A. (2001), The Costs and Benefits of Hedonism: Some Consequences of Taking Casual Leisure Seriously, “Leisure Studies”, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 305–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360110086561

Stempień J.R. (2020), Dysfunkcjonalizm metodologiczny – nowa propozycja analityczna w socjologii sportu i jej zastosowanie na przykładzie szachów, “Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej”, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 162–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.16.1.10

Szacka B. (2003), Wprowadzenie do socjologii, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa.

Taylor N., Loughrey B. (1984), Middleton’s Chess Strategies in “Women Beware Women”, “Studies in English Literature 1500–1900”, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 341–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/450532

Terret T. (2013), Pierre de Coubertin (1863–1937): a proponent of sporting masculinity, “Journal of Olympic History”, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 4–7.

Veal A.J. (2017), The Serious Leisure Perspective and the Experience of Leisure, “Leisure Sciences”, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 205–223, https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1189367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2016.1189367

Veličković D., Radovanović D. (2018), Gender Differences in Chess Performance, “Facta Universitatis. Series: Physical Education And Sport”, vol. 16, pp. 359–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPES180926032V

Winter E. (2003), Capablanca v Alekhine – 1927, https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/capablancaalekhine1927.html (accessed 27.05.2020).

Winter E. (2015a), Championship confusion, https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/winter126.html (accessed 27.05.2020).

Winter E. (2015b), The Ginzburg-Fischer interview, https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/winter128.html (accessed 27.05.2020).

Winter E. (2020), Chess and Women, https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/women.html (accessed 27.05.2020).

http://www.olimpbase.org

http://www.pzszach.pl

http://www.ratings.fide.com

http://www.wom.fide.com