Socjologia a praktyka rozwiązywania problemów społecznych – między naukowymi a nieformalnymi teoriami problemów społecznych

Iwona Kudlińska

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.50.08

Authors

Iwona Kudlińska Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Ekonomiczno- Socjologiczny, Katedra Socjologii Stosowanej i Pracy Socjalnej, Instytut Socjologii

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.50.08

Keywords:

formal theories, informal theories, practice wisdom, sociology of social problems, social constructionism

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the interrelationships between social sciences (especially sociological theories of social problems) and practice in solving contemporary social problems. Shall be indicated that nowadays link between a theory and its understanding and application in practice is not evident and might not even exist. This situation maintains because sociologists fear that getting involved in practice may seem to be unprofessional and demean their work’s value as science. On the other hand, practitioners in social services are more likely to be critical and unwilling to apply academic theories into practice, they are more likely to build informal/ practice theories and guide by the “practice wisdom”.

In the paper research findings about the process of social constructing of parental upbringing inefficiency were examined as the example of informal theories. Both formal and informal theories are similar (they include definitions of social problems, their causes, possible solutions and an example) and perform similar functions. Both of them interpenetrate, their aim is to build significant stories of the social problem and to convince the society to suggested solutions of the problem.

The aim of the article, referring to academic literature and author’s research analyzes, is to enable to answer the question how private and practice-driven theories become social constructs that provide guidance on social workers’ professional activity in a way academic formal theories do. Informal theories on one hand may be seem as an eclectic approach, but on the other hand they can be powerful force that make social work into a ritual that reaffirms and perpetuates the problematic condition.

References

Arendell T. (2000), Conceiving and Investigating Motherhood: The Decade’s Scholarship, „Journal of Marriage and the Family”, Vol. 62, No. 4, s. 1192–1207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01192.x

Argyris C., Schon D. (1974), Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, Jossey‒Bass, San Francisco.

Beckett Ch. (2010), Podstawy teorii dla praktyków pracy socjalnej, Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej, Warszawa.

Burawoy M. (2005), 2004 ASA Presidential Address – For Public Sociology, „American Sociological Review”, February, Vol. 70, pp. 4–28, polska wersja: http://burawoy.berkeley.edu/PS/Translations/Poland/ASA.Polish.pdf, 5.04.2014.

Frysztacki K. (2009), Socjologia problemów społecznych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.

Gray M., Webb S. (2012), Praca socjalna. Teorie i metody, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Howe D. (2011), Krótkie wprowadzenie do teorii pracy socjalnej, Instytut Rozwoju Służb Społecznych, Warszawa.

Jamrozik A., Nocella L. (2000), The Sociology of Social Problems: Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kantowicz E. (2005), Praca socjalna w Europie. Inspiracje teoretyczne i standardy kształcenia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie, Olsztyn.

Knight B. (1996), Reflecting on ‘reflective practice’, „Studies in the Education of Adults”, Vol. 28, No. 2, s. 162‒184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.1996.11730638

Lishman (1996), Podręcznik teorii dla nauczycieli praktyki w pracy socjalnej, [tłum. Krzysztof Czekaj], Wydawnictwo Naukowe „Śląsk”, Katowice.

Miś L. (2007), Problemy społeczne: teoria, metodologia, badania, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.

Payne M. (2005), Modern social work theory, Lyceum Books, Chicago.

Pryjmachuk S. (1996), A nursing perspective on the interrelationships between theory, research and practice, „Journal of Advanced Nursing”, No. 23, s. 679–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00037.x

Rubington E., Weinberg M. (2003), The Study of Social Problems: Seven Perspectives, 7th Ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

Sasson T. (1995), Crime Talk, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne (NY).

Sibeon R. (1990), Comments on the Structure and Forms of Social Work Knowledge, „Social Work and Social Sciences Review”, Vol. 1, No. 1, s. 29–44.

Spector M., Kitsuse J. (1973a), Social Problems: A Reformulation, „Social Problems”, Vol. 21, No. 2, s. 145–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1973.21.2.03a00010

Spector M., Kitsuse J. (1973b), Toward a Sociology of Social Problems: Social Condition, Value Judgments and Social Problems, „Social Problems”, Vol. 20, No. 4, s. 407–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/799704

Surette R. (2011), Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice. Images, Realities, and Policies, 4th Ed., Cengage Learning, Wadsworth.

Szatur-Jaworska B. (1995), Teoretyczne podstawy pracy socjalnej, [w:] T. Pilch, I. Lepalczyk (red.), Pedagogika społeczna. Człowiek w zmieniającym się świecie, Wydawnictwo Akademickie „Żak”, Warszawa, s. 106–122.

Sztompka P. (1971), O pojęciu teorii w socjologii, „Studia Socjologiczne”, nr 3, s. 19–52.

Sztompka P. (1985), Teoria socjologiczna końca XX wieku. Wstęp do wydania polskiego, [w:] J. H. Turner, Struktura teorii socjologicznej, PWN, Warszawa, s. 9–53.

Walls L., Wong-Wylie G. (2007), The social construction of motherhood: Implications and interventions, research paper presented at the Association for Research on Mothering’s 11th Annual Conference: „Maternal Health and Well-Being”, October 19‒21, 2007, Toronto, Canada.