Disabled citizens – defining their own role in the political process. An empirical analysis of the attitudes of disabled people in Poland in 2002–2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.59.03Keywords:
disability, political subjectivity, citizenship, European Social SurveyAbstract
Define our own role in the process of political participation determines the manner of its implementation, and therefore the attitude we adopt the operating entity in the wider political community. This may be the attitude of an active actor co-responsible for the direction and quality of the policy, or lacking a sense of agency. In the case of disabled persons adopt the first of them it is difficult due to both objective barriers associated with perceptual-motor constraints, and because of the subjective, deeply rooted in society and among the disabled themselves, stereotyping ways of thinking about the functioning of this social category in society. Going beyond this scheme requires the realization of the social model of disability, in which persons with disabilities are active participants in social life, contributing to its development.
The aim of the article is to present the dynamics of change in the perception of people with disabilities in Poland, their subjectivity in the political dimension. The analysis will cover issues such as: interest in politics, trust in political institutions and the generalized others, their capacity to co-create the policy. The data used in the empirical analysis is derived from European Social Survey (2002–2014).
References
Barnes C. (2012), Understanding the social model of disability: past, present and future, [in:] N. Watson , A. Roulstone, C. Thomas (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, Routledge, London‒New York, pp. 12–29.
Bogacz-Wojtanowska E. (2014), Partycypacja polityczna i społeczna. Niepełnosprawni obywatele w Polsce, [in:] B. Gąciarz, S. Rudnicki (eds.), Polscy niepełnosprawni. Od kompleksowej diagnozy do nowego modelu polityki społecznej, Wydawnictwa AGH, Kraków, pp. 235–274.
Conrad P. (1992), Medicalization and social control, “Annual Review of Sociology”, Vol. 18, pp. 209–232.
Dziubka K. (1998), Społeczeństwo obywatelskie: wybrane aspekty ewolucji pojęcia, [in:] A.W. Jabłoński, L. Sobkowiak (eds.), Studia z teorii polityki, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław, Vol. 2, pp. 31–52.
ESS Round 1–7: European Social Survey Round 1–7 Data (2002–2014), Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
Finkelstein V. (1980), Attitudes and disabled people, World Rehabilitation Fund, New York.
Gąciarz B., Bartkowski J. (2014), Położenie społeczno-ekonomiczne niepełnosprawnych w Polsce na tle sytuacji osób niepełnosprawnych w krajach Unii Europejskiej, „Niepełnosprawność. Zagadnienia, Problemy, Rozwiązania”, No. 2 (11), pp. 20–43.
Hall J. A. (2000), Reflections on the Making of Civility in Society, [in:] F. Trentmann (ed.), Paradoxes of Civil Society: New Perspectives on Modern German and British History, Berghahn Books, New York, pp. 47–57.
Keane J. (1988), Democracy and Civil Society, Verso Books, London.
Konwencja o prawach osób niepełnosprawnych sporządzona w Nowym Jorku dnia 13 grudnia 2006 r., Dz. U. 012, No. 0, item 1169.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), United Nations, available at: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf (21.07.2016).
Marshall Th. H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Oliver M. (1981), A New Model of the Social Work Role in Relation to Disability, [in:] J. Campling (ed.), The Handicapped Person: A New Perspective for Social Workers?, RADAR, London, pp. 19–32.
Oliver M. (1990), The Politics of Disablement, Macmillan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
Oliver M. (2009), Understanding Disability. From Theory to Practice. Second Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire.
Oliver M., Barnes C. (2012), The New Politics of Disablement, Palgrave Macmillan, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-39244-1
Perez-Diaz V. M. (1996), Powrót społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w Hiszpanii, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
Raciborski J. (2011), Obywatelstwo w perspektywie socjologicznej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Schwartz Sh. H. (2014), A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations across Nations: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_values.pdf (4.04.2016).
Shakespeare T. (2010), The social model of disability, [in:] L. J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader, Routledge, New York‒London, pp. 263−277.
Shearer A. (1981), Disability: Who’s Handicap? Understanding everyday experience, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Shils E. (1992), Civility and Civil Society, [in:] E. C. Banfield (ed.), Civility and Citizenship in Liberal Democratic Societies, New York: Paragon House, pp. 1–16.
Siegler M., Osmond H. (1974), Models of Madness: Models of Medicine, Macmillan, New York.
Skarżyńska K. (1999), Aktywność i bierność polityczna, [in:] K. Skarżyńska (ed.), Psychologia polityczna, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
Sztompka P. (2007), Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
Theiss-Morse E. (1993), Conceptualizations of Good Citizenship and Political Participation, “Political Behavior”, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 355–380.
Torney-Purta J., Lehmann R., Oswald H., Schultz W. (2001), Citizenship and Education in Twenty-eight Countries. Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen, The International Association for the Evaluations of Educational Achievement, Amsterdam: http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/CIVED_Phase2_Age_Fourteen.pdf (16.07.2016).
UPIAS – Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (1975), The Fundamental Principles of Disability, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/fundamental%20principles.pdf (21.07.2016).
Zola I. K. (1983), Socio-Medical Inquiries: Recollections, Reflections, and Reconsiderations, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

