The role of present temporal orientation in explaining preferred sexual strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-969X.16.09Keywords:
psychological time, temporal perspective, sociosexualityAbstract
This paper presents two researches conducted to verify the hypothesis that present temporal orientation is significant variable in describing human preferences of sexual strategies. First survey was conducted using as a independent variable two scales measuring temporal orientation: Carpe Diem (Sobol & Oleś, 2002), AION (Bajcar & Nosal, 2004), as a dependent variable was taken preferred sexual strategies measured by Sociosexsual Orientation Inventory (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991). Comparing participants with high rate of present temporal orientation vs low rate of present temporal orientation shows statistically significant differences in Sociosexuality Orientation Scale. Second research confirm hypothesis that participants declaring being sexoholic have higher rate of temporal concentration on presence measured by ZPTI (Zimbardo & Boyd, 2009).
References
Boyd J.N. i Zimbardo P.G. (1997), Constructing Time After Death: The transcendental-future time perspective, „Time & Society”, 6(1), 35–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X97006001002
Buss D.M. (2000), Ewolucja pożądania. Jak ludzie dobierają się w pary, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
Buss D.M. (2001), Psychologia ewolucyjna. Jak wytłumaczyć społeczne zachowania człowieka? Najnowsze koncepcje, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
Buss D.M. i Barnes M.F. (1986), Preferences in human mate selection, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 50, 559–570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559
Buss D.M. i Schmidt D.P. (1993), Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating, „Psychological Review”, 100, 204–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
Buss D.M. i Schmit D.P. (1996), Strategic Self-Promotion and Competitor Derogation: Sex and Context Effects on the Perceived Effectiveness of Mate Attraction Tactics, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 70, 6, 1185–1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1185
Cottle T.J. (1976), Perceiving time. A psychological investigation of with men and women, Wiley&Sons, New York.
Covas V.L. (2000), Temporal perspective, purpose in life, and optimism as factors of resiliency in at-risk male adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering (60) 5822.
Droit R.P. (2004), 101 zabaw filozoficznych, GWP, Gdańsk.
Hall C.S. i Lindzey G. (2002), Teorie osobowości, PWN, Warszawa.
Hall E.T. (1999), Taniec życia. Inny wymiar czasu, Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie MUZA, Warszawa.
Hawking S. (2007), Krótka historia czasu, „Wydawnictwo Zysk i s-ka”, Warszawa.
Lewin K. (1951), Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers, Harper New York.
Łukaszewski W. (1983), Osobowość – orientacja temporalna – ustosunkowanie do zmian, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
Nosal C.S. (2000), Czas jako wymiar regulacji zachowania. Problemy psychologii temporalnej, [w:] O różnych sposobach uprawiania psychologii, J. Brzeziński, S. Kowalik (red.), Zysk i S-ka, Poznań, 106–130.
Nosal C.S. (2002), Problem umysłowych reprezentacji czasu i poziomów temporalności, „Studia Psychologiczne”, 10, 55–70.
Nosal C.S. i Bajcar B. (2004), Czas psychologiczny: wymiary, struktura, konsekwencje, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warszawa.
Penton-Voak I.S., Perret D.I., Castles D.L., Kobayashi T., Burt D.M., Murray L.K. i Minamisawa R. (1999), Menstrual cycle alters face preference, „Nature”, 388, 741–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/21557
Penton-Voak I.S. i Perret D.I. (2000), Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence, „Evolution and Human Behavior”, 21, 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1
Simpson J.A. i Gangestad S.W. (1991), Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 60, 870–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
Simpson J., Gangestad S., Christensen P. i Leck K. (1999), Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality,and intrasexual competitive tactics, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 76(1),159–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.159
Sobol M. i Oleś P. (2002), Orientacja temporalna carpe diem a poczucie satysfakcji z życia, „Przegląd Psychologiczny”, 45, 3, 331–346.
Szymańska I. (2006), Związki orientacji socioseksualnej kobiet i mężczyzn z preferencjami dymorfizmu płciowego, (niepublikowana praca magisterska) Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław.
Trivers R.L. (1972), Parental investment and sexual selection, [w:] Sexual selection and the descent of man, B. Campbell (red.), Aldine, 1871–1971 (136–179), Chicago, IL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129266-7
Lew Starowicz Z. (2007), Zdrowie seksualne – historia, kryteria, promocja, [w:] Zdrowie seksualne, J. Rzepka (red.), Górnośląska Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna im. Kardynała Augusta Hlonda, Mysłowice.
Öner B. (2002), Self-Monitoring and Future Time Orientation in Romantic Relationships, „Journal of Psychology”, 136(4), 420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604168
Shell D. i Husman J. (2001), The Multivariate Dimensionally of Personal Control and Future Time Perspective Beliefs in Achievement and Self-Regulation, „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, 26 (4), 481–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1073
Wilczyńska J., Drwal R.Ł. (1995), Opracowanie Kwestionariusza Aprobaty Społecznej (KAS), [w:] Adaptacja kwestionariuszy osobowości. Wybrane zagadnienia i techniki, P. Brzozowski, P. Oleś (red.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Zaleski Z. (1994), Psychology of future orientation, TN KUL, Lublin [Poland].
Zaleski Z. (1996), Future anxiety: Concept, measurement and preliminary research, „Personality and Individual Differences”, 21, 165–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00070-0
Zaleski Z. (2002), Future horizon: A challenging concept for psychology, [w:] Adolescents’ future-orientation: Theory and research, J. Trempała, L.-E. Malmberg (red.), Peter Lang GmbH, Frankfurt am Main [Germany], 123–129.
Zaleski Z. (2005), Future Orientation and Anxiety, [w:] Understanding Behaviour in the Context of Time, Theory, Research and Application, A. Strathman i J. Joireman (red.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New York, 125–141.
Zimbardo P.G. i Boyd J.N. (1999), Putting time in perspective: a valid reliable individual differences metric, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 77, 1271–1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Zimbardo P.G. i Boyd J.N. (2009), Paradoks czasu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Zuckerman M., Bone R., Neary R., Mangelsdorff D. i Brustman B. (1972), What is the sensation seeker? Personality trait and experience correlates of the Sensation-Seeking Scales, „Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology”, 39(2), 308–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033398
Yost M. i Zurbriggen E. (2006), Gender Differences in the Enactment of Sociosexuality: An Examination of Implicit Social Motives, Sexual Fantasies, Coercive Sexual Attitudes, and Aggressive Sexual Behavior, „Journal of Sex Research”, 43(2), 163–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552311
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
