Witch Hunts in the 17th Century New England in the Perspective of the Concept of Collective Effervescence by Émile Durkheim

Authors

  • Alicja Borowik Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Szkoła Doktorska Nauk Humanistycznych image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1506-6541.30.06

Keywords:

Émile Durkheim, collective effervescence, collective representations, collective rituals, Salem, witches, witch hunts, witch trials

Abstract

The goal of the article is to show how the concept of collective effervescence by Émile Durkheim facilitates the shift in Cognitive Science of Religion (as postulated by Sebastian Schüler) by emphasizing the interrelationships between the human mind, body and social life. The concept is applied in the analysis of the witch trials of 17th century Salem, Massachusetts. Particular emphasis is placed on the bodily dimension of human gatherings – an aspect that interests contemporary scholars of Cognitive Science of Religion who refer to the works of Durkheim and his students. Collective effervescence and its components – i.e. the formation of assemblies, creation of spontaneous rituals, and collective representations – are used to analyse the phenomenon and to answer the question about possible causes of the events that took place in Salem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Salem Witchcraft Papers, ed. P. Boyer and S. Nissenbaum, New York, 1977. Digital edition – revised, corrected, and augmented by B.C. Ray, T.S. Wood, 2018, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/category/swp.html

Cotton Mather, To John Richards IV Coll 8; Levin/MHS (not in Mather’s hand) May 31, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/letters/to_richards1.html

Letter of Deodat Lawson, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/letters/lawsons_london_letter.html

Letter of Deodat Lawson, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/letters/lawsons_london_letter.html

Letters Written by the Reverend Cotton Mather: To John Foster, August 17, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/letters/to_foster.html

SWP No. 125: Tituba, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n125.html

SWP No. 138: Abigail Williams, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n138.html

SWP No. 009: William Barker, Sr., https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n9

SWP No. 025: Richard Carrier, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n25.html

SWP No. 008: Mary Barker, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n8.html

SWP No. 091: Mary Marston, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n91

SWP No. 094: Rebecca Nurse Executed: July 19, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n94.html

SWP No. 013: Bridget Bishop Executed, June 10, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n13.html

SWP No. 015: Mary Black, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n15.html

SWP No. 013: Bridget Bishop Executed, June 10, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n13.html

SWP No. 094: Rebecca Nurse Executed: July 19, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n94.html

SWP No. 075: Mary Ireson, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n75

SWP No. 134: Sarah Wardwell, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n134.html

SWP No. 094: Rebecca Nurse Executed: July 19, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n94.html

SWP No. 096: Mary Osgood, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n96.html

SWP No. 131: Martha Tyler, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n131.html

SWP No. 139: Sarah Wilson, Sr., https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n139.html

SWP No. 017: Mary Bridges, Sr., https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n17.html

SWP No. 025: Richard Carrier, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n25.html

Sermons of the Rev. Samuel Paris. March 27, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/sermons/parris16920327.html

Sermons of the Rev. Samuel Paris. May 5, 1692, https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/sermons/parris16920508.html

Boyer P., Nissenbaum S., Salem Possessed. The Social Origins of Witchcraft, Cambridge 2001.

Caporael L.R., Ergotism. The Satan Loosed in Salem?, „Science” 1976, t. 192, nr 423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.769159

Certeau M. de, The Possession at Loudun, tłum. M.B. Smith, Chicago 2000.

Collins R., Łańcuchy rytuałów interakcyjnych, tłum. K. Suwada, Kraków 2011.

Durkheim É., Elementarne formy życia religijnego. System totemiczny w Australii, tłum. A. Zadrożyńska, Warszawa 2010, s. 188.

Evans-Pritchard E.E., Czary, wyrocznie i magia u Azande. Wersja skrócona, tłum. S. Szymański, Warszawa 2008.

Harner M., The Role of Hallucinogenic Plants in European Witchcraft, [w:] Hallucinogens and Shamanism, red. M. Harner, Oxford 1972.

Harris M., Krowy, świnie, wojny i czarownice. Zagadki kultury, tłum. K. Szerer, Warszawa 1985.

Mauss M., Socjologia i antropologia, tłum. M. Król, K. Pomian, J. Szacki, Warszawa 1973.

Schjoedt U., Sørensen J., Nielbo K.L., Xygalatas D., Mitkidis P., Bulbulia J., Cognitive resource depletion in religious interactions, „Religion, Brain & Behavior” 2013, t. 3, nr 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2012.736714

Schüler S., Synchronized Ritual Behavior: Religion, Cognition and the Dynamics of Embodiment, „Religion and the Body. Modern Science and the Construction of Religious Meaning” 2012, t. 138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004225343_006

Segal R.A., Relativism and Rationality in Social Sciences, „The Journal of Religion” 1987, t. 67, nr 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/487560

Spanos N.P., Ergotism and the Salem Witch Panic: a Critical Analysis and an Alternative Conceptualization, „Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences” 1983, t. 19, nr 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198310)19:4<358::AID-JHBS2300190405>3.0.CO;2-G

Spanos N.P., Gottlieb J., Ergotism and the Salem Village Witch Trials, „Science” 1976, t. 194, nr 4272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.795029

Szumowski W., Historia medycyny filozoficznie ujęta, Warszawa 1994.

Xygalatas D., Konvalinka I., Bulbulia J., Roepstorffi A., Quantifying collective effervescence. Heart-rate dynamics at a fire-walking ritual, „Communicative & Integrative Biology” 2011, t. 4, nr 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.17609

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Witch Hunts in the 17th Century New England in the Perspective of the Concept of Collective Effervescence by Émile Durkheim. (2024). Zeszyty Wiejskie, 30, 29-49. https://doi.org/10.18778/1506-6541.30.06