Consensus Social Movements and Their Significance in a Globalizing World – the Example of the Focolare Movement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.47.03Keywords:
consensus social movement, communal subjectivity, cultural orientation, socializationAbstract
The importance of consensus social movements consists in the creation of new cultural orientations based on the principles of humanism and universal values, and the way they catalyse the process of a new state of ‘social aggregation’ and strive to gain control over historicity by actively taking part in structuring the global world. They mark a path of constructive social involvement, both on an individual and communal plane. The essential activity of consensus social movements is promoting a new culture ‒ i.e. lifestyles which constitute an alternative to those in the mainstream ‒ as well as concrete action for social change. Such movements consist mainly consists of “work at the base”, i.e. activity at the most fundamental human level. One of the specific characteristics of consensus movements, which sets them apart from different movements, is the fact that social mobilization in this case is not based on conflict; it is geared toward constructive action. The Focolare Movement has existed since the 1940s. It is present in 182 countries and has over 2 million members and adherents, mainly Catholics, but also about 50 thousand members of other denominations and about 30 thousand followers of other religions as well as about 70 thousand non-believers. They get together, despite their differences, and engage in solving social problems on every level – global, international, local and interpersonal.
References
Araújo V. (2008), Nowi ludzie, “Nowe Miasto”, No. 2‒3, pp. 96‒99.
Google Scholar
Araújo V. (2009), “Świecki” Bóg, “Nowe Miasto”, No. 3‒4, pp. 44‒45.
Google Scholar
Castells M. (2008), Siła tożsamości, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Della Porta D., Diani M. (2009), Ruchy społeczne, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Giddens A. (2001), Nowoczesność i tożsamość, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Giddens A. (2006), Socjologia, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Lubich C. (1997), Zalążki nowego ludu. Fragmenty przemówienia Chiary Lubich wygłoszonego po otrzymaniu nagrody UNESCO za “Wychowanie dla pokoju”, “Nowe Miasto”, No. 1, pp. 8‒9.
Google Scholar
Lubich C. (2007), Charyzmat jedności, Wydawnictwo M, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Statuti Generali Opera di Maria (1999), CittàNuova, Roma.
Google Scholar
Sztompka P. (2005), Socjologia zmian społecznych, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Szymczyk J. (red.) (2010), Wartości. Interesy. Struktury społeczne. Uwarunkowania ludzkiej kreatywności i partycypacji w życiu publicznym, NORBERTINUM, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Touraine A. (1988), Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Google Scholar
Touraine A. (1995), Wprowadzenie do analizy ruchów społecznych, [in:] J. Szczupaczyński (red.), Władza i społeczeństwo, Vol. 1, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa, pp. 212‒225.
Google Scholar
Touraine A. (2006), Rola podmiotu w społeczeństwach nowoczesnych, [in:] A. Jasińska-Kania, L. Nijakowski, J. Szacki, M. Ziółkowski (red.), Współczesne teorie socjologiczne, Vol. 2, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa, pp. 769‒788.
Google Scholar
Touraine A. (2006), Rola podmiotu w społeczeństwach nowoczesnych, [in:] A. Jasińska-Kania, L. Nijakowski, J. Szacki, M. Ziółkowski (red.), Współczesne teorie socjologiczne, Vol. 2, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa, pp. 769‒788.
Google Scholar
Zanzucchi M. (1997), Nagroda UNESCO dla Chiary Lubich, “Nowe Miasto”, No. 1, pp. 8‒9.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

