Cultures of Trust and Alienation in the Situation of Post-modernism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.48.01Keywords:
social trust, social capital, alienation, social anomie, islands of trust, vectors of persons’ activity, postmodernismAbstract
In the article the reasons of activation of study of the social trust phenomenon as a key element of social capital are analyzed; tree historical phases of the development of culture of trust and at the same time three forms of it’s real existence in the modern society – low, middle and high – and the influence of each of these forms of trust on the development of the social capital in the situation of post-modernism are considered. Transformation of culture of trust is shown as a process deeply connected to the overcoming of alienation and anomie. The first form – conditional trust – leads to the fast growth of the material assets of the society and at the same time is stimulating the growth of alienation. The middle level of trust becomes the way of compensation of the mutual irresponsibility through the activation of social initiatives and at the same time leads to the emergence of “islands of trust”; between them the territories of distrust are becoming wider, which leads to the growth of fears, concerns about security. The third – high – form of culture of trust, which is the basis of the responsible activity, is gradually taking shape as a mindset of a free-from-alienation person, who wants to take part in the polyphonic life of modern society, in it’s multi-vector development, in the overcoming of crisis situations emerging in it, acting on behalf of himself, his group and the whole humanity simultaneously.
References
Bachmann R. (2001), Trust, Power and Control in Transorganizational Relations, „Organization Studies”, Vol. 22, No. 2, s. 337‒365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222007
Beck U., Giddens А., Lash S. (2009), Modernizacja refleksyjna. Polityka, tradycja i estetyka w porządku społecznym nowoczesności, [tłum. Jacek Konieczny], Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Bourdieu Р. (1996), State nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, Polity Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503615427
Czapiński J., Panek T. (red.) (2007), Diagnoza społeczna 2007. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków, www.diagnoza.com/files/diagnoza2007/raport_11.11.2007.pdf, 09.07.2010.
Czapiński J., Panek T. (red.) (2009), Diagnoza społeczna 2009. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków, www.analizy.mpips.gov.pl/images/stories/publ_i_raporty, 09.07.2010.
F u k u y a m a Y. F. (1997), Zaufanie: kapitał społeczny a droga do dobrobytu, [przekł. z ang. Anna i Leszek Śliwa], Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa–Wrocław.
Fukuyama Y. F. (2000), Koniec historii, [przekł. z ang. Tomasz Bieroń, Marek Wichrowski], Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań.
Goffman E. (2010), Analiza ramowa, [tłum. Stanisław Burdziej], Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS, Kraków.
Hardin R. (2009), Zaufanie, [przekł. z ang. Agnieszka Gruba], Wydawnictwo Sic!, Warszawa.
Jenkins C. (1986), Foundation Funding of Progressive Social Movements, [w:] The ers Guide, J. Shellow, N. Stella (eds.), Moyer-Bell, Mt. Kisco 1986, s. 1‒13.
Клеман K. (2009), От «обывателей» к «активистам». Условия «рефрейминга» // «Как люди делают себя» (Рефрейминг как механизм формирования групповой идентификации). Исследовательский проект на 2007–08, Е. Даниловой (под рук.), Институт Социологии Российской Академии Наук, Москва.
Kozlova O., Izdebska K. (red.) (2013), Cultures of Trust, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Minerwa, Szczecin.
Lane F. C., Riemersma J. (eds.) (1953), Enterprise and Secular Change: Readings in Economic History, Allen and Unwin, London (quoted in „Accounting and rationality”).
Marks K. (2002), Kapitał ‒ Krytyka ekonomii politycznej, Tom pierwszy ‒ Księga I Proces wytwarzania kapitału, Polska Sekcja MIA, http://www.marxists.org/polski/marks-engels/1867/ kapital/index.htm, 11.05.2012.
Патрушев С (2007), Научный доклад (II). Социальные сети доверия, массовые движения и институты политического представительства в современной России: опыт „старых” и „новых” демократий в условиях глобализации, Российский Государственный Научной Фонд, Институт Социологии РАН, Центр Политологии и Политической Социологии, Отдел Сравнительных Политических Исследований, Москва, http://www.isras.ru/seti_doveria.html, 12.03.2010.
Putnam R. D. (ed.) (2002), Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195150899.001.0001
Розанов В. В. (1990), Сумерки просвещения, Педагогика, Москва.
Rydgren J. (2009), Social Isolation? Social Capital and Radical Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe, „Journal of Civil Society” 2009, September, Vol. 5, Issue 2, s. 129‒150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680903154915
Sennett R. (2007), Korozja charakteru. Osobiste konsekwencje pracy w nowym kapitalizmie, [tłum. z ang. Jan Dzierzgowski, Łukasz Mikołajewski], ser. „Spectrum”, Wydawnictwo Literackie MUZA, Warszawa.
Sztompka P. (2007), Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa, Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

