Percepcja produktu w kontekście przekazu reklamowego – analiza na podstawie dwu metod badania podobieństwa

Małgorzata Banaszczyk

doi:10.18778/1427-969X.11.13

Autor

Małgorzata Banaszczyk Uniwersytet Łódzki, Instytut Psychologii, Zakład Psychologii Społecznej i Organizacji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-969X.11.13

Słowa kluczowe:

perception in advertising, similarity

Abstrakt

The purpose of the study was to show that interpretation of observed objects depends on the context (in this case context was the advertisement) in which they are seen. The second goal was to show the equivalence of two methods used to investigate similarity between objects – affinity index and comparison in pairs. The group of 180 people aged 19–32 participated in the study. They valuated similarity between three identical objects but advertised in three different ways. Using multidimensional scaling method the perception maps of the three products were created. Data unequivocally proved that they were seen as dissimilar. The Pindis procedure revealed that both methods used to investigate similarity are methodologically equivalent. They can be used interchangeably.

Bibliografia

Aronson E., Wilson T. D., Akert R. M. (1997), Psychologia społeczna. Serce i umysł, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań

Biela A. (1992), Skalowanie wielowymiarowe jako metoda badań naukowych, Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, Lublin

Brzęziński J., Stachowski R. (1981), Zastosowanie analizy wariancji w eksperymentalnych badaniach psychologicznych, PWN, Warszawa

Chaudhuri A. (1996), The effect of media, product and message factors on ad persuasiveness: The role of affect and cognition, „Journal of Marketing Communications”, 2, 201–218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135272696346051

Chaudhuri A., Buck R. (1995), Affect, Reason, and Persuasion. Advertising Strategies That Predict Affective and Analytic-Cognitive Responses, „Human Communication Research”, 21, 3, 422–441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00353.x

Batra R., Ray M. L. (1983), Operationalizing involvement as depth and quality of cognitive response, „Advances in Consumer Research”, 10, 309–313

Bootzin R. R., Bower G. H., Crocer J., Hall E. (1991), Psychology Today, McGraw-Hill, New York

Doliński D. (1999). Psychologia reklamy, Agencja Reklamowa „Aida”, Wrocław

Falkowski A., Tyszka T. (2001), Psychologia zachowań konsumenckich, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk

Greenwald A. G., Leavitt C. (1984), Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels, „Journal of Consumer Research”, 11, 581–592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/208994

Greenwald A. G., Leavitt C., Obermiller C. (1980), What is low consumer involvement?, Paper Session: Perspectives on consumer involvement, Columbus (OH)

Hammond M. (1987), Measuring emotions, „Marketing & Media”, 10, 51–55

Houston M. J., Rothschild M. L. (1977), A paradigm for research on consumer involvement, Graduate School of Business, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Johnson B. T., Eagly A. H. (1989), Effect of Involvement on Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis, „Psychological Bulletin”, 106, 290–314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.106.2.290

Kall J. (1998), Reklama, PWE, Warszawa

Kleine R. E., Kernan J. B. (1988), Measuring the Meaning of Consumption Objects: An Empirical Investigation, „Advances in Consumer Research”, 15, 498–504

Le Clerc F., Little J. D. C. (1997), Can advertising copy make FSI coupons more effective?, „Journal of Marketing Research”, 34, 473–484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400405

Lindsay P. H., Norman D. A. (1984), Procesy przetwarzania informacji u człowieka, PWN, Warszawa

Lingoes J. C., Borg I. (1978), A direct approach to individual differences scaling using increasingly complex transformations, „Psychometrika”, 43, 491–519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293810

Shavitt S. (1990), The role of attitude objects in attitude function, „Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, 26, 124–148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90072-T

Wilkie W. L. (1994), Consumer Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, New York