Choice of The Fiscal Rules in The Long Run

Authors

  • Michał Mackiewicz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.7.06

Abstract

Paper examines the problem of choice of an optimal fiscal rule in the long run. An ideal rule would typically assure fair distribution of utility over generations, while allowing to maintain the sustainable fiscal position. Three commonly used types: debt, deficit and expenditure rules are considered. The main conclusion is that only the modified deficit rule fulfils the assumptions. The rule requires that government’s policy should aim at keeping the debt-to-GDP ratio constant over the economic cycle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alesina A., Perotti R. (1994), The Political Economy of Budget Deficits, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, Working Paper, No. 4637.

Alesina A., Perotti R. (1996), Budget Deficits and Budget Institutions, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, Working Paper, No. 5556.

Banca d’Italia (2001), Fiscal Rules, proceedings from the conference held in Perugia, February 2001.

Belka M. (2003), Co to są zdrowe finanse publiczne? (What Are Healthy Public Finances?, text in Polish), [in:] Polska transformacja. Sukcesy i bariery. Refleksje z okazji jubileuszu Profesora Jana Mujżela, University of Lodz Editions, Lodz.

Brunila A., Buti M., Franco D. (2001), The Stability and Growth Pact. The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Palgrave, Houndmills.

Buiter W. H. (1998), Notes on A Code for Fiscal Stability, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, Working Paper, No. 6522.

Buiter W. H. (2003), Ten Commandments for a Fiscal Rule in the E(M)U, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA.

Buti M., Giudice G. (2002), EMU’s Fiscal Rules: What Can and Cannot Be Exported, European Commission Working Paper, 30 April.

Chiang A. C., (1984), Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York etc.

Inman R. P. (1996), Do Balanced Budget Rules Work? U. S. Experience and Possible Lessons for the EMU, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, Working Paper No. 5838.

Kopits G., Symansky S., (1998), Fiscal Policy Rules, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, „Occasional Paper” No. 162.

Kydland F., Prescott E., (1977), Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans, „Journal of Political Economy” 85.

Milesi-Ferretti (1997), Fiscal Rules and the Budget Process, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, „Discussion Paper”, No. 1664.

Milesi-Ferretti (2000), Good, Bad or Ugly? On the Effects of Fiscal Rules with Creative Accounting, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, Working Paper, No 00/172.

Mills P. Quinet A. (2001), The Case for Spending Rules, in: Banca d’Italia, 2001.

Perry G. (2002), Can Fiscal Rules Help Reduce Macroeconomic Volatility in LAC?, Paper from the IMF conference in Oaxaca, Mexico, January 2002.

Romer D. (1996), Advanced Macroeconomics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York etc.

Stiglitz J. (1988), Economics of the Public Sector, W. W. Norton & Co., New York, London.

Tokarski T. (2001), Determinanty wzrostu gospodarczego w warunkach stałych efektów skali (The Determinants of Economics Growth Under Constant Effects of Scale, text in Polish), Chair of Economics, University of Lodz.

von Hagen J. (1992), Budgeting Procedures and Fiscal Performance in the European Communities, Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, „Economic Paper”, No. 96.

Downloads

Published

2004-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mackiewicz, Michał. 2004. “Choice of The Fiscal Rules in The Long Run”. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe 7 (1-2): 120-41. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.7.06.