Networking leader and local oligarchies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.44.06Keywords:
involvement, oligarchy, knowledge, project classAbstract
This paper presents a case study from Hungary about the “Nagykunságért” LEADER Local Action Group, which demonstrates the limits of an actor’s involvement in local rural development. Project participation in this region depends on the financial and managerial capacity of participants. Actors with capacity are involved with the project as a matter of course, but those without capacity are crowded out and lack access to resources. Actors in rural development are characterised by their ability to disseminate diverse kinds of information and use of knowledge. Inclusion, exclusion, and the power of local oligarchies are main concepts in this paper, which studies LEADER as a tool which may be used either for democracy or against local democratic control over the distribution of development funds.
References
Bruckmeier K. (2004), CORASON – Framework for the Analysis of Rural Sustainable Development, http://www.corason.hu, 21.03.2012.
Csite A. (2005), Reménykeltők, Századvég, Budapest.
Csurgó B., Kovách I. (2000), LEADER in Hungary – Bottom-up development with top-down control. Three case studies from Hungary, HAS CSS Institute for Sociology, Budapest.
Csurgó B., Kovách I., Kučerová E. (2008), Knowledge, Power and Sustainability in Contemporary Rural Europe, „Sociologia Ruralis”, July, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 292–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00461.x
Csurgó B., Kovách I., Légmán A., Megyesi B. (2010), Energy demand, Governance and Infrastructure in Hajdú Bihar County: The Hungarian Case, [in:] I. Gotts, I. Kovách (eds.), Climate Change and Local Governance: Alternative approaches to influencing household energy consumption: A comparative study of five European regions, MTA Politikatudományi Intézet, Budapest, pp. 185–224.
Fazekas Z., Nemes G. (2005), Kísérleti Leader-jellegű program Magyarországon, [in:] AVOP Leader+ készségek elsajátítása, Tananyag, Promei-Faluműhely Alapítvány-Szrva-ZRVA, pp. 457–482.
High Ch., Nemes G. (2007), Social learning in LEADER: Exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 103–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x
Kelemen E., Boldizsár M., Nagy Kalamász I. (2008), Knowledge Dynamics and Sustainability in Rural Livelihood Strategies: Two Case Studies from Hungary, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 48, Issue 3, pp. 257–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00467.x
Kiss K., Szekeresné Köteles R. (2010), A helyi akciócsoportok szerepe a versenyképes és fenntartható vidékfejlesztés megvalósításában, „Tér és Társadalom”, vol. 24, szá. 3, pp. 119–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.24.3.1331
Kovách I. (2000), LEADER, New Social Order, and the Central and East-European Countries, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 40, Issue 2, pp. 181–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00140
Kovách I., Kucerová E. (2006), The Project Class in Central Europe: The Czech and Hungarian Cases, „Sociologia Ruralis”, No. 1, Vol. 46, s. 181‒189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00403.x
Kovách I., Kucerová E. (2009), The Social Context of Project Proliferation – The Rise of a Project Class, „Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning”, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 203–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080903033804
Maurel M.-C. (2009), Local actors facing environmental issues: lessons for a bottom-up approach, http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/00/50/30/99/PDF/8_Maurel_2009_Local_actors_facing_environmental_issues.pdf, 21.03.2012.
Nemes G. (2005), A Magyarországi vidékfejlesztés eddigi tapasztalatai, a Leader+ intézkedés tartalmi elemei és alkalmazásának szabályai, [in:] AVOP Leader+ készségek elsajátítása, Tananyag, Promei-Faluműhely Alapítvány-Szrva-ZRVA, pp. 331–354.
Ray C. (2001), Territorial co-operation between rural areas: elements of a political economy of EU rural development, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 41, Issue 3, pp. 279–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00183
Shortall S. (2004), Social or Economic Goals, Civic Inclusion or Exclusion? An Analysis of Rural Development Theory and Practice, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp. 109–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00265.x
Shucksmith M. (2000), Endogenous Development, Social Capital and Social Inclusion: perspectives from leader in the UK, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 40, Issue 2, pp. 208–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00143
Shucksmith M., Chapman Pollyanna P. (1998), Rural Development and Social Exclusion, „Sociologia Ruralis”, Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 225–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00073
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
