Difficulties concerning quantitative research in contemporary migration studies. Selected issues

Authors

  • Jakub Adamski Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologiczny, Instytut Socjologii, Katedra Socjologii Sztuki image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.53.02

Keywords:

quantitative research, migrations, immigration, emigration, databases

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show those dealing with issues of contemporary migration studies, what are the basic difficulties arising from quantitative research in this field. Issues concerning definitions are tended to with the most focus. These are best described as multilayered, but aside from problems with deciding the meaning of a given concept, there is a number of influences that come into play – political (teleological), legal, practical, process-wise and temporal. For those reasons, all of the above serve as a point of departure for comments made in regard to measurements, interpretations, access, controversies, and inconsistent and low-quality information found in databases. As a result, data dispersion and fragmentation becomes a nuisance, which significantly hinders the ability to carry out comparative research, both between countries as well as different categories of citizens of a given country. Also discussed is a token data-mining system on the issues of foreign migration. Closing arguments touch on a several chosen aspects of an actual research process, relevant from the standpoint of contemporary migration studies. This reconstruction refers to both Polish and European contexts.

References

Barcz J., Górka M., Wyrozumska A. (2012), Instytucje i prawo Unii Europejskiej. Podręcznik dla kierunków prawa, zarządzania i administracji , LexisNexis Polska, Warszawa.

Castles S., Miller M. J. (2011), Migracje we współczesnym świecie, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Chatty D., Marfleet P. (2013), Conceptual problems in forced migration, „Refugee Survey Quarterly”, Vol. 32, No. 2, s. 1–13, http://rsq.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/2/1.full.pdf+html, 15.04.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdt008

Dobson J., Latham A., Salt J. (2010), European Migration Network Annual Report on Asylum and Migration Statistics for the UK 2007, Home Office UK Border Agency, London, http://www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/research/transnational-spaces/migration-research-unit/publica-tions/pdfs/27._UNITED_KINGDOM_Annual_Report_on_Asylum_and_ Migration_Statis-tics_2007_FINAL_Version_March2010.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Dzięglewski M. (2012), Współczesne studia migracyjne jako wielowymiarowa układanka, „Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Socologica IV”, t. 2, s. 7–13, http:// www.ifis.up.krakow.pl/studia_sociologica/images/SS_IV_2/Dzieglew-ski1.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Edwards S. (2008), Computational Tools in Predicting and Assessing Forced Migration, „Journal of Refugee Studies”, Vol. 21, No. 3, s. 347–359, http://jrs.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/3/347. full.pdf+html, 15.04.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen024

European Migration Network (2014), Asylum and Migration Glossary 3.0, European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/ docs/emn-glossary-en-version.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Eurostat (2015), Concepts and Definitions. Eurostat’s Concepts and Definitions Database, http:// ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm?TargetUrl=LST_NOM_DTL_GLOS-SARY&StrNom=CODED2&StrLanguageCode=EN, 11.04.2015.

Feller E. (2005), Refugees are not migrants, „Refugee Survey Quarterly”, Vol. 24, No. 4, s. 27–35, http://rsq.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/4/27.full.pdf+html, 15.04.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdi077

Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2011), Departament Badań Demograficznych – Wydział Analiz i Badań Migracji, System badań migracji zagranicznych w Polsce, http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/migracje-ludnosci/system-badan-migracji-zagranicznych-w-polsce,7,1.html, 11.04.2015.

Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2015), Definicje pojęć, http://stat.gov.pl/metainformacje/slownik-po¬jec/definicje-pojec, 11.04.2015.

Henning S., Hovy B. (2011), Data Sets on International Migration, „International Migration Review”, Vol. 45, No. 4, s. 980–985, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-7379. 2011.00874_2.x/full, 15.04.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00874_2.x

Jaźwińska E. (2000), Metody ilościowe w badaniach nad migracjami międzynarodowymi, Instytut Studiów Społecznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, http://www.migracje. uw.edu.pl/download/publikacja/248, 15.04.2015.

Kaczmarczyk P. (2002), Migracje o charakterze cyrkulacyjnym a inne formy mobilności terytorialnej w świetle doświadczeń badawczych, Instytut Studiów Społecznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, http://www.migracje.uw.edu.pl/publ/579, 15.04.2015.

Kaczmarczyk P. (red.) (2014), Recent Trends in International Migration in Poland. The 2012 SOPEMI Report, Ośrodek Badań nad Migracjami, Warszawa, http://www.migracje.uw.edu.pl/ publ/2373, 15.04.2015.

King R. (2012), Theories and Typologies of Migration: An Overview and a Primer, Malmö Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare, Malmö, https://www.mah.se/upload/ Forskningscentrum/MIM/WB/WB%203.12.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Kraler A., Reichel D. (2011), Measuring Irregular Migration and Population Flows – What Available Data Can Tell, „International Migration”, Vol. 49, No. 5, s. 97–128, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00699.x/full, 15.04.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00699.x

Kupiszewska D. (2009), Data Collection Systems and Practices in Poland Relevant to Research on Migration and Integration, Central European Forum for Migration and Population Research, Warszawa, http://www.cefmr.pan.pl/docs/cefmr_wp_2009-03.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Kupiszewski M. (2004), Metodologiczne problemy prognozowania migracji zagranicznych, „Zeszyty Naukowe”, t. 15, Kolegium Gospodarki Światowej Szkoły Głównej Handlowej, Warszawa, http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.dl-catalog-0e0bc6b2-9ce-8-4b9e-b078-25fc96a13e55/c/Zeszyty_Naukowe_SGH-2004-9-15-21-34.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Perruchoud R., Redpath-Cross J. (eds.) (2011), Glossary on Migration, 2nd ed., IOM International Organization for Migration, Geneva, http://www.epim.info/wp-content/up-loads/2011/01/iom.pdf, 15.04.2015.

United Nations (UN) (1998), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, Re¬commendations on Statistics of International Migration, Revision 1, United Nations, New York, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/SeriesM/seriesm_58rev1e. pdf, 15.04.2015.

Vargas-Silva C. (2012), EU Migrants in other EU Countries: An Analysis of Bilateral Migrant Stocks, The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, http://www.migrationobserva¬tory.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/ migobs/EU%20migrant%20stocks.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Vollmer B. (2011), Irregular Migration in the UK: Definitions, Pathways and Scale, The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/sites/ files/migobs/Briefing%20-%20Irregular%20Migration_0.pdf, 15.04.2015.

Voutira E., Doná G. (2007), Refugee Research Methodologies: Consolidation and Transformation of a Field, „Journal of Refugee Studies”, Vol. 20, No. 2, s. 163–171, http://jrs.oxfordjournals.org/ content/20/2/163.full.pdf+html, 15.04.2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem017

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Adamski, Jakub. 2015. “Difficulties Concerning Quantitative Research in Contemporary Migration Studies. Selected Issues”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, no. 53 (June): 11-29. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.53.02.