Zmiana paradygmatu rozwoju obszarów wiejskich w krajach Unii Europejskiej

Hanna Podedworna

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.63.09

Authors

Hanna Podedworna Dr hab., prof. SGGW, Katedra Socjologii, Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, ul. Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warszawa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.63.09

Keywords:

rural development, new rural paradigm, new rural economy, territorial cohesion, neo-endogenous rural development

Abstract

The article analyses the paradigm shift regarding rural development in the EU. Social changes taking place in rural areas, the development of new rural economy as well as globalization process redefines rural developmental objectives and strategies. The quality of life becomes developmental goal in rural local communities, instead of narrowly defined rural development, which was described in terms of increase in agricultural production. This change requires a new developmental policy, focusing on territorial cohesion. Participation in the developmental proces depends on the level of civil society organisation in local communities. A better use of positive consequences of developmental intervention ensures a high level of organization and connections of different social actors and institutions.

References

Ambrosio-Albalá M., Bastiaensen J. (2010). The new territorial paradigm of rural development: Theoretical foundations from systems and institutional theories, http://www.ua.ac.be/objs/00251118.pdf [dostęp 04.12.2017].
Google Scholar

Bell M., Lloyd S. E., Vatovec Ch. (2010). Activating the Countryside: Rural Power, the Power of the Rural and the Making of Rural Politics, “Sociologia Ruralis”, no. 50, s. 205–224.
Google Scholar

Bryden J. (2008). The New Rural Paradigm. Policies and Governance. NILF Seminar Presentation, nilf.no/om_nilf/Seminarer/2008/sn20080505-Plansjer-JMB.pdf [dostęp 01.12.2017].
Google Scholar

Copus A. K. (2015). The New Rural Economy and macro-scale patterns, [w:] A. K. Copus, P. De Lima (eds.), Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London, New York, s. 11–34.
Google Scholar

Copus A. K., Dax T., De Lima P. (2015), Epilogue, [w:] A. K. Copus, F. De Lima (eds.), Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London, New York, s. 236–248.
Google Scholar

Copus A. K., De Lima P. (eds.) (2015). Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London, New York.
Google Scholar

Dax T. (2014). Shaping rural development research in Europe: Acknowledging the interrelationships between agriculture, regional and ecological development, “Studies in Agricultural Economics”, no. 116, s. 59–66.
Google Scholar

Dax T. (2015). The Evolution of European Rural Policy, [w:] A. K. Copus, F. De Lima (eds.), Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London, New York, s. 35–52.
Google Scholar

Dynamics of Rural Transformations in Emerging Economies OECD (2010), www.ruraldevelopment.gov, za: Dialogues [dostęp 30.11.2017].
Google Scholar

Freshwater D. (2000). Three Papers on Rural Development, http://www.rural.org/publications/Freshwater00-14.pdf [dostęp 02.12.2017].
Google Scholar

Freshwater D. (2017). Economic Transformations: Understanding the Determinants of Rural Growth, Sage Handbook of Rural Studies, e-book, s. 189–202.
Google Scholar

The Future of Rural Society (1988), “Bulletin of the European Communities Supplement”, no. 4 (88).
Google Scholar

Meadows D. E., Meadows D. L., Randers J., Behrens III W. (1973). Granice Wzrostu. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Mirwaldt K., McMaster I., Bachter J. (2008). Reconsidering Cohesion Policy. The contested Debate on Territorial Cohesion, EoRPA Paper, no. 08 (5), www.eprc-strath.eu/public/dam/jcr:533e17a2.../EoRPA_08-5.pdf [dostęp 01.12.2017].
Google Scholar

Natário M. M., Neto P. A. (2009). The New Rural Paradigm and the Public Policies in France: Rural Excellence Poles, “Agricultural Economics and Rural Development. New Series”, Year VI, no. 1, s. 125–144, www.ipe.ro/RePEc/iag/iag_pdf/AERD0901_125-144.pdf [dostęp 01.12. 2017].
Google Scholar

Ray Ch. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU, [w:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. H. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage Publications Ltd., London, s. 278–291.
Google Scholar

Schneider F., Kallis G., Martinez-Alier J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, no. 18, s. 511–518, www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro [dostęp 27.11.2017].
Google Scholar

Shucksmith M. (2013). Future Directions in Rural Development – Full Report, Carnegie UK Trust, Dunfermline.
Google Scholar

Sotte F. (2004). From CAP to CARPE: The state of the question, http://ecsocman.hse.ru/ [dostęp 01.12.2017].
Google Scholar