Language Proficiency and Sonorant Devoicing in English Plosive-Sonorant Clusters

Klára Přečková; Pavel Šturm; Jan Volín

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.21.4.06

Authors

Klára Přečková Charles University, Department of English Language and ELT Methodology, Prague, Czech Republic
Pavel Šturm Charles University, Institute of Phonetics, Prague, Czech Republic
Jan Volín Charles University, Institute of Phonetics, Prague, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.4.06

Keywords:

voicing, devoicing, aspiration, sonorants, English, Czech, foreign language

Abstract

This article explores the timing of phonetic voicing in plosive-sonorant clusters in English. VOT was measured in two groups of Czech learners with different proficiency levels and a native English control group. The hypothesis was that cross-language differences in the implementation of the voicing contrast would be reflected in lower devoicing by the non-native speakers, modulated by proficiency. 24 participants read a text with plosive-sonorant clusters (such as in plan or troops). The study found that less proficient speakers exhibited smaller degrees of devoicing compared to more proficient speakers, who however did not differ from the native controls. In line with the absence of devoicing in Czech secondary-school textbooks, the results provide insight into the interplay between language proficiency and pronunciation details in L2 acquisition.

The research was supported by the European Regional Development Fund-Project ‘Creativity and Adaptability as Conditions of the Success of Europe in an Interrelated World’ (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000734). The study was created within the Charles University programme ‘Cooperatio’, scientific field Linguistics.

References

Abramson, Arthur S. and Douglas H. Whalen. 2017. Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions. Journal of Phonetics 63. 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker and Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Cho, Taehong and Peter Ladefoged. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27 (2). 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094

Chodroff, Eleanor Rosalie and Melissa Baese-Berk. 2019. Constraints on variability in the voice onset time of L2 English stop consonants. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain and Paul Warren (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, paper 710. Canberra, Australia: ASSTA.
Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. 8th edn. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203784969
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203784969

Docherty, Gerry J. 1992. The Timing of Voicing in British English Obstruents. Berlin: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872637
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872637

Fahey, Danielle. 2019. Voice Onset Times of voiceless stops by bilingual Korean-English children: Phonetic acquisition and sociolinguistic preferences. In Hope Wilson et al. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 2017 Second Language Research Forum, 79–91. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Google Scholar

Flege, James Emil. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6

Flege, James Emil and James Hillenbrand. 1984. Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (3). 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391257
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391257

Gonet, Wiktor and Radosław Święciński. 2012. More on the voicing of English obstruents: Voicing retention vs. voicing loss. Research in Language 10 (2). 183–199. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0035-8
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0035-8

Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2001. Remains of a submerged continent: Preaspiration in the languages of Northwest Europe. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1999, 157–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.215.12han
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.215.12han

Hanzawa, Keiko. 2018. The development of Voice Onset Time (VOT) in a content-based instruction university program by Japanese learners of English: A longitudinal study. Canadian Modern Language Review 74. 502–522. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2018-0196
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2018-0196

Hoole, Philip. 1999. Laryngeal coarticulation. Section A: Coarticulatory investigations of the devoicing gesture. In William J. Hardcastle & Nigel Hewlett (ed.), Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, 105–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486395.006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486395.006

Klatt, Dennis. 1975. Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18. 686–706. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1804.686
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1804.686

Laver, John. 2012. Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter and Keith Johnson. 2015. A Course in Phonetics. 7th edn. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar

Lenth, Russell V. 2022. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
Google Scholar

Lisker, Leigh and Arthur S. Abramson. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20. 384–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830

Machač, Pavel and Radek Skarnitzl. 2009. Principles of Phonetic Segmentation. Praha: Nakladatelství Epocha.
Google Scholar

Mairano, Paolo, Bene Bassetti, Mirjana Sokolović-Perović and Tania Cerni. 2018. Effects of L1 orthography and L1 phonology on L2 English pronunciation. Revue Française De Linguistique Appliquée 23 (1). 45–57. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.231.0045
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.231.0045

Ogden, Richard. 2017. An Introduction to English Phonetics. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Piske, Thorsten, Ian R. A. MacKay and James Emil Flege. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29 (2). 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134

Podlipský, Václav Jonáš, Šárka Šimáčková and Kateřina Chládková. 2021. Phonetic drift reveals interconnected phonological representations in simultaneous bilinguals: A case study of English and Czech stop consonants. International Journal of Bilingualism 25(3). 789–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920932211

Přečková, Klára. 2022. Sonorant Devoicing in Plosive-sonorant Clusters in Czech-accented and Native British English [Unpublished BA thesis]. Faculty of Arts, Charles University.
Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
Google Scholar

Roach, Peter. 2009. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Saud Alharbi, Amirah, Anouschka Foltz, Lisa Kornder and Ineke Mennen. 2022. L2 acquisition and L1 attrition of VOTs of voiceless plosives in highly proficient late bilinguals. Second Language Research [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221124011
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221124011

Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2022. Asymmetrical cross-language phonetic interaction: Phonological implications. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 12 (2). 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19092.sch
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19092.sch

Sieczkowska, Jagoda, Bernd Möbius and Grzegorz Dogil. 2010. Specification in context – Devoicing processes in Polish, French, American English and German sonorants. In Takao Kobayashi, Keikichi Hirose and Satoshi Nakamura (ed.), Proceedings of Interspeech 2010, 1549–1552. Makuhari, Japan: ISCA. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2010-451
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2010-451

Skarnitzl, Radek and Jana Rumlová. 2019. Phonetic aspects of strongly-accented Czech speakers of English. AUC Philologica 2/2019. 109–128. https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2019.21
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2019.21

Strycharczuk, Patrycja. 2012. Sonorant transparency and the complexity of voicing in Polish. Journal of Phonetics 40 (5). 655–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.006

Tsuchida, Ayako, Abigail C. Cohn and Masanobu Kumada. 2000. Sonorant devoicing and the phonetic realization of [spread glottis] in English. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 13. 167–181.
Google Scholar

Volín, Jan. 2002. IPA-Based Transcription for Czech Students of English. Praha: Karolinum.
Google Scholar