From Behind the Great Wall with (No) Strings Attached? Visegrád Group Vulnerabilities and Dependencies on Chinese Dual-Use Imports

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.29.21

Keywords:

dual-use, V4 economies, China, economic security, resilience

Abstract

This paper examines the dependence of the Visegrád Group (V4) economies on imports of advanced dual-use goods from China. Using frameworks of international political economy, economic security, and weaponised interdependence, dual-use items are treated as potential geoeconomic leverage. Vulnerability areas are identified through the analysis of trade in value added, intra-industry trade, and strategic import dependencies. The findings show a growing share of Chinese value added in V4 final demand and exports, reinforcing structural dependence in machinery, automotive, electronics, optics, and chemicals. On the one hand, weak comparative advantages and external vulnerabilities limit the V4’s resilience and position in global value chains. On the other hand, however, the intensity of the intra-industry trade suggests untapped potential for upgrading domestic production of dual-use goods. Recommendations include strengthening national and EU capabilities in dual-use clusters, regionally coordinated development of R&D ecosystems, leveraging knowledge-intensive services, prioritising European content, and improving analytics to map critical nodes, as well as direct and indirect dependencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersson, P., Lindberg, F. (eds.) (2024), National Perspectives on Europe’s De-risking from China. A report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC), July 2024, https://merics.org/en/report/national-perspectives-europes-de-risking-china (accessed: 1.11.2024).

Blackwill, R., Harris, J. (2016), War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1c84cr7

Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. (2012), Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Brown, S. (2018), Power, Perception and Foreign Policymaking: US and EU Responses to the Rise of China, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315227504

Cieślik, E. (2019), Towards more (un)balanced trade. Production linkages between China and the Visegrad countries: country-level and sector-level analysis, “European Planning Studies”, 27 (8), pp. 1523–1541, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1589424

Copeland, D.C. (2014), Economic Interdependence and War, Princeton University Press, Princeton, https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691161587.001.0001

Draghi, M. (2024), The future of European competitiveness, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/draghi-report_en (accessed: 1.10.2025).

Drezner, D.W. (2024), How Everything Became National Security: And National Security Became Everything, “Foreign Affairs”, 103 (5), pp. 122–135.

Éltető, A., Sass, M., Götz, M. (2022), The dependent Industry 4.0 development Path of the Visegrád countries, “Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics”, 8 (3), pp. 147–168, https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v8i3.980

European Commission (2021), Strategic dependencies and capacities Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe’s recovery, SWD(2021) 352 final, Brussels, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021SC0352 (accessed: 1.10.2025).

European Commission (2023), An EU approach to enhance economic security, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_3358 (accessed: 22.06.2023).

European Commission (2024), 2024 – Dual use correlation table 8 November – 31 December 2024.xlsx, https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/0e5f18c2-4b2f-42e9-aed4-dfe50ae1263b/library/54d330dd-ecda-4cb7-aa95-e298acf90d6d/details (accessed: 1.12.2024).

European Commission (2026), Industrial Accelerator Act, https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/publications/industrial-accelerator-act_en (accessed: 17.03.2026).

Eurostat (2025), https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/comext/newxtweb/setupdimselection.do# (accessed: 28.10.2025).

Evenett, S., Jakubik, A., Martín, F., Ruta, M. (2024), The return of industrial policy in data, “The World Economy”, 47 (7), pp. 2762–2788, https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13608

Farrell, H., Newman, A. (2019), Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion, “International Security”, 44 (1), pp. 42–79, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351

Ferriani, F., Albori, M., Ristuccia, L. (2025), Beyond military sales: the market premium on dual-use R&D in the defence sector, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5738343 (accessed: 25.11.2025).

Fjäder, C. (2018), Interdependence as Dependence: Economic Security in the Age of Global Interconnectedness, [in:] M. Wigell, S. Scholvin, M. Aaltola (eds.), Geo-economics and Power Politics in the 21st Century, Routledge, London, pp. 28–42.

Freudlsperger, C., Meunier, S. (2024), When Foreign Policy Becomes Trade Policy: The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, 62 (4), pp. 1063–1079, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13593

Fulda, A. (2024), Germany and China: How Entanglement Undermines Freedom, Prosperity and Security, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350357051

Garcia, W.C., Ho, V. (2025), External Vulnerability Index (EXVI), “Single Market Economics Briefs”, 14, https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/document/download/abf56ac2-f7c3-4cb6-b58b-577533ae274e_en?filename=External%20Vulnerability%20Index.pdf&prefLang=lv (accessed: 25.03.2025).

García-Herrero, A., Krystyanczuk, M. (2025), What can Europe learn from China’s critical-tech innovation push, “Bruegel Policy Brief”, 29, https://www.bruegel.org/policy-brief/what-can-europe-learn-chinas-critical-tech-innovation-push (accessed: 7.11.2025).

Guerrieri, P., Padoan, P.C. (2024), Industrial Policy and Security: The European Union and the Double Challenge, Strengthening Competitiveness and Enhancing Economic Security, [in:] F. Cerniglia, F. Saraceno (eds.), Investing in the Structural Transformation: European Public Investment Outlook, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, pp. 135–148, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0434

Guinea, O., Sharma, V., Marel, E. van der, Roy, O. du (2025), Breaking Barriers, Boosting Growth: Unlocking the Power of Digital Technology for Europe’s Competitiveness, “ECIPE Policy Brief”, 14, https://ecipe.org/publications/breaking-barriers-boosting-growth-eu-digital-competitiveness (accessed: 3.10.2025).

Helwig, N., Sinkkonen, V. (2022), Strategic Autonomy and the EU as a Global Actor: The Evolution, Debate and Theory of a Contested Term, “European Foreign Affairs Review”, 27 (SI), pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2022009

Hrynkiv, O., Lavrijssen, S. (2024), Not Trading with the Enemy: The Case of Computer Chips, “Journal of World Trade”, 58 (1), pp. 61–86, https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2024003

Infuture Institute (2025), Emerging Technologies Index (ETI) – Raport przełomowych technologii, https://infuture.institute/raporty/emerging-technologies-index-eti-raport-przelomowych-technologii (accessed: 1.10.2025).

ITC (2025), Trade Map, https://www.trademap.org (accessed: 28.10.2025).

Javorčík, B. (2025), Chińskie wyzwanie dla Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, https://www.rp.pl/handel/art43132331-beata-javorcik-chinskie-wyzwanie-dla-europy-srodkowo-wschodniej (accessed: 24.10.2025).

Melnychuk, V., Pavliuk, V. (2025), The Visegrad Four Countries as an Object of China’s Geopolitical Interests in the Context of Great-power Confrontation, “Balkan Social Science Review”, 25 (25), https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR252525305m

Naughton, B. (2021), The Rise of China’s Industrial Policy, 1978 to 2020, Universidad Nacional Autónomica de México, Facultad de Economía, México, https://docs.dusselpeters.com/CECHIMEX/Naughton2021_Industrial_Policy_in_China_CECHIMEX.pdf (accessed: 24.10.2025).

Nissen, C., Dreyer, J. (2024), From optimist to sceptical liberalism: reforging European Union foreign policy amid crises, “International Affairs”, 100 (2), pp. 675–690, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae013

Nölke, A., Vliegenthart, A. (2009), Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe, “World Politics”, 61 (4), pp. 670–702, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098

NSS (2025), National Security Strategy of the United States of America, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf (accessed: 5.12.2025).

OECD (2025a), Guide to OECD Trade in Value Added (TiVA) Indicators, 2025 edition, https://stats.oecd.org/wbos/fileview2.aspx?IDFile=2143f34e-6feb-41a9-abaf-cb52132608c4 (accessed: 4.11.2025).

OECD (2025b), OECD Supply Chain Resilience Review: Navigating Risks, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/94e3a8ea-en

OECD (2025c), Trade in Value Added (TiVA) 2025 edition, https://data-explorer.oecd.org/?pg=0&bp=true&tm=%22%28TIVA%29%202025%20edition%22&snb=2%20 (accessed: 4.11.2025).

Pandiyan, J., Schild, J. (2025), A Geopolitical Turnabout? EU and US Dual-use Export Controls Towards China, “European Foreign Affairs Review”, 30 (2), pp. 179–198, https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2025018

Pavlínek, P. (2025), Europe’s Auto Industry: Global Production Networks and Spatial Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009453196

Poutala, T., Sinkkonen, E., Mattlin, M. (2022), EU Strategic Autonomy and the Perceived Challenge of China: Can Critical Hubs Be De-weaponized?, “European Foreign Affairs Review”, 27 (SI), pp. 79–98, https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2022015

Pucek, K., Stoelinga, F., Korteweg, R. (2026), What China is Learning from the West’s Sanctions against Russia, https://www.clingendael.org/publication/what-china-learning-wests-sanctions-against-russia (accessed: 5.02.2026).

Qiu, L., Chen, Q., Zhu, X., Yang, L., Gu, W. (2025), An Examination of the Evolution of Green Industry Structure and Sustainable Cooperation Strategies Between China and the Visegrád Group: A Product Space Approach, “Systems”, 13 (7), 508, https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070508

Roberts, A., Choer Moraes, H., Ferguson, V. (2019), Toward a Geoeconomic Order in International Trade and Investment, “Journal of International Economic Law”, 22 (4), pp. 655–676, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz036

Rosén, G., Meunier, S. (2023), Economic Security and the Politics of Trade and Investment Policy in Europe, “Politics and Governance”, 11 (4), https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7858

Shopov, V. (2026), Pivoting in plain sight: China’s stealthier geoeconomics, https://ecfr.eu/article/pivoting-in-plain-sight-chinas-stealthier-geo-economics (accessed: 7.02.2026).

Sinkkonen, E. (2025), China’s technological development: Security implications in an era of great power rivalry, “FIIA Briefing Paper”, 422, https://fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/BP422_Chinas-technological-development.pdf (accessed: 23.10.2025).

Spalding, R. (2022), War Without Rules: China’s Playbook for Global Domination, Sentinel, New York.

Stec, G. (2025), Member states’ resilience efforts fall short of looming challenges: Europe-China Resilience Audit Update 2025, https://merics.org/en/report/member-states-resilience-efforts-fall-short-looming-challenges-europe-china-resilience-audit (accessed: 3.11.2025).

Svetlicinii, A., Su, X. (2025), The Unsettled Governance of the Dual-use Items under Article XXI (b)(ii) GATT: A New Battleground for WTO Security Exceptions, “World Trade Review”, 24 (1), pp. 75–100, https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474562400048X

Szép, V. (2024), The legislative history of the EU’s anti-coercion instrument, “ERA Forum”, 25 (1), pp. 127–139, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-024-00784-x

Šebeňa, M., Chan, T., Šimalčík, M. (2023), The China factor: Economic exposures and security implications in an interdependent world, https://ceias.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CEIAS_Exposures-paper_FINAL.pdf (accessed: 1.06.2023).

Vlčková, J. (2018), Visegrad countries in global production networks: Value creation, control and capture, “Geographia Polonica”, 91 (4), pp. 427–448, https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0129

Winickoff, D., King, R. (2025), Why innovation needs smarter governance, not just faster tech, https://www.oecd.org/en/blogs/2025/06/why-innovation-needs-smarter-governance-not-just-faster-tech.html?adestraproject=Science%2C+Technology+and+Innovation (accessed: 18.06.2025).

WTO (2025), Global Value Chain Development Report 2025: The Rewiring of GVCs in a Changing Global Economy, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gvcreport2025_e.pdf (accessed: 7.02.2026).

Zenglein, M.J. (2024), The World’s Factory Strikes Back, https://merics.org/en/report/worlds-factory-strikes-back (accessed: 1.10.2025).

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Michalski, Bartosz. 2026. “From Behind the Great Wall With (No) Strings Attached? Visegrád Group Vulnerabilities and Dependencies on Chinese Dual-Use Imports”. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe 29 (3): 111-30. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.29.21.