Foreign Direct Investment and the Socio-economic Cohesion of the European Union: Experiences of the New Member Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.9.15Abstract
International economic integration can worsen the situation of so called problem regions within the integrated area, i.e. less developed regions or undergoing structural transformation or located in peripheries. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) flowing into the new member states in economic and social cohesion of the enlarged Union and to answer a question whether it enhances or impedes the cohesion of the EU. This problem has several aspects and it could be examined at the European, national and regional levels. This chapter focuses on FDI flows into the new member states and their regions, with special reference to Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
The enlargement of the EU brought about an unprecedented widening of economic and social disparities within the Union which must be treated as a challenge that the enlarged EU faces. Although the impact of FDI on the socio- economic cohesion of the EU 15 examined at the European level seemed to be limited, the enlarged EU can benefit from FDI inflows stimulating the development of all the new Member States.
The impact of FDI on the socio-economic cohesion of the enlarged EU examined at the national and regional levels is controversial. FDI seems to stimulate disparities between regions of the EU and within these regions. FDI tends to be located in the most dynamic regions of host countries which consequently makes catching up processes of lagging regions even more difficult.
Downloads
References
Agarwal J.P. (1980). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 4:749-754.
J. Cantwell (1987). The Reorganisation of European Industries After Integration: Selected Evidence on the Role of Multinational Enterprise Activities, Journal of Common Market Studies, 26 (2): 127-151.
Central Statistical Office (2004). Działalność gospodarcza spółek z udziałem kapitału zagranicznego w 2003r. (Economic activity of firms with foreign capital participation in 2003).Warszawa: GUS (in Polish).
Dunning J.H. (1977). Trade Location of Economic Activities and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach, in: The International Allocation of Economic Activities. Proceedings of a Nobel Symposium held at Stockholm, ed. B.Ohlin, P.O. Heeselborn, P.M. Wijkman, pp. 395- 418. London-Basingstoke: MacMillan Press Ltd.
Dunning J.H. (1979). Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production: in Defence of Eclectic Theory, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 4: 269-291.
Dunning J.H.(1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 1: 30-64.
European Commission (2003). Second Progress report on economic and social cohesion, COM 34 final. Brussels: EC.
European Commission (2004). A new Partnership for Cohesion. Convergence Competitiveness Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels: EC.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2003). Regional distribution of gross domestic product (GDP) 2001, Budapest: Financial Statistical Department of HCSO.
W. Molle (1990). The Economics of European Integration (Theory, Practice, Policy), Aldershot.
UNCTAD (2004). Word Investment Report 2004. The Shift Towards Services. New York and Geneva: UN.
UNCTAD (2001). World Investment Report 2001. Promoting Linkages. New York and Geneva: UN.
G.N. Yannopoulos (1990). Foreign Direct Investment and European Integration. The Evidence
from the formative Years of the European Community. Journal of Common Market Studies 28 (3): 247-257.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
