The Pan-European Personal Pension Product – Managers’ Challenges and Savers’ Expectations

Krzysztof Waliszewski; Antoni Kolek; Przemysław Barankiewicz

doi:10.18778/1508-2008.28.23

Authors

Krzysztof Waliszewski Poznań University of Business and Economics, Poznań, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4239-5875
Antoni Kolek Kozminski University, Polish Pension Institute, President of the Management Board, Warsaw, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3315-1609
Przemysław Barankiewicz Finax Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7186-0564

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.28.23

Keywords:

pension system, private pension schemes, PEPP

Abstract

The Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) is a strategic initiative of the European Union (EU) aimed at creating a harmonized, portable pension savings framework that addresses the challenges of population aging, increased labor mobility, and the widening pension gap across Member States. This article investigates the implementation and performance of the PEPP in four EU countries – Poland, Slovakia, Croatia, and the Czech Republic – through a mixed-methods research design.

The study combines a legal and comparative analysis of national pension systems with qualitative interviews conducted with PEPP fund managers and quantitative surveys of PEPP savers. The findings reveal significant disparities in regulatory approaches, tax treatment, and supervisory frameworks between countries, which affect both the attractiveness and functionality of PEPP. Despite the shared design principles of transparency, safety, and cost-efficiency, savers’ expectations differ notably across countries – especially in relation to customer service, information delivery, and minimum return expectations – while also being shaped by sociodemographic factors.

The qualitative research highlights that fund managers face challenges such as regulatory fragmentation, high administrative burdens, and competition from national products with more favorable tax treatment or employer-based incentives. At the same time, digital tools and passive investment strategies are seen as key to enhancing PEPP’s scalability and efficiency.

The article concludes that for PEPP to succeed as a truly pan-European product, further regulatory harmonization, consistent tax incentives, and comprehensive financial education efforts are essential. The authors also propose that increased provider competition and adaptive national policies could accelerate the product’s uptake. The study offers practical insights for EU policymakers, national regulators, and financial institutions aiming to promote inclusive and sustainable retirement savings across the continent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akerlof, G.A., Shiller, R.J. (2015), Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton University Press, Princeton, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc777w8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc777w8

Anioł, W. (2013), The Norden Route. Modernizacja po skandynawsku, Elipsa, Warszawa.

Baggio, T. (2023), The role of Capital Market Union in the Pan-European Pension Product, Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia.

Barr, N. (1993), Economics of social policy, Academy of Economics, Poznań.

Bär, M. (2022), The pan-European Personal Pension Product: key characteristics and main challenges, “Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft”, 111 (3), pp. 305–337, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-022-00535-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-022-00535-2

Better Finance (2023), Will you afford to retire? The Real Return of Long-term and Pension Savings, https://betterfinance.eu/wp-content/uploads/PSR23_Croatia.pdf (accessed: 31.08.2024).

Borg, K., Minto, A., Meerten, H. van (2019), The EU’s Regulatory Commitment to a European Harmonized Pension Product (PEPP): The Portability of Pension Rights vis-à-vis the Free Movement of Capital, “Journal of Financial Regulation”, 5(2), pp. 150–178, https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjz005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjz005

Butler, G. (2021), Private Pensions and EU Internal Market Law: Enhancing Retirement Provision through Harmonisation, “European Business Law Review”, 32 (5), pp. 853–876, https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr202103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EULR2021030

Castles, F. (2000), Comparative Public Policy. Patterns of Post-war Transformation, Edward Elgar, Northampton.

Dieleman, B. (2020), Tax treatment of the PEPP: the new pan-European Personal Pension Product, “Ec Tax Review”, 29 (3), pp. 111–116, https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2020037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2020037

Dimitrov, S. (2021), Role of tax incentives for increase in personal pensions saving, “VUZF Review”, 6 (4), pp. 175–184, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/549310-role-of-tax-incentives-for-increase-in-p-10fe31c7.pdf (accessed: 13.01.2025).

EIOPA(2024), Own-initiative OPSG Discussion Paper. Pan-European Pension Product Market development, Challenges, Obstacles, Solution, Occupational Pensions Stakeholder Group, Frankfurt, https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/document/download/88c75466-65ac-422c-a0bd-0c0b178db8fb_en?filename=OPSG-2024-21%20OPSG_Own-initiative%20Discussion%20Paper%20on%20Pan-European%20Pension%20Product%20-%20Market%20development%2C%20Challenges%2C%20Obstacles%2C%20Solutions.pdf (accessed: 4.01.2025).

Esping-Andersen, G. (2010), Three worlds of the capitalist welfare state, Difin, Warszawa.

Hadad, E., Dimitrov, S., Stoilova-Nikolova, J. (2022), Development of capital pension funds in the Czech Republic and Bulgaria and readiness to implement PEPP, “European Journal of Social Security”, 24 (4), pp. 342–360, https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627221150542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627221150542

Hill, M. (2010), Polityka społeczna we współczesnym świecie. Analiza porównawcza, Difin, Warszawa.

Kaleta, P. (2021), Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) – an outline, “Ubezpieczenia Społeczne. Teoria i praktyka”, 148 (1), pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8336

Kawinski, M., Szumlicz, T., Więckowska, B. (2019), Doubt insurance in the social security system, “Social Policy”, 545 (8), pp. 8–17.

Kochaniak, K., Korzeniowska, A.M., Huterska, A.A., Demirhan, D., Susmuş, T. (2023), Does the Pan-European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 26 (4), pp. 141–162, https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.35

Kolek, A., Sobolewski, O. (2022), OFE, PPK, IKE(+) – zmiany w systemie emerytalnym 2019–2021 – analiza prawno-ekonomiczna, “Monitor Prawniczy. Dodatek”, 4.

Kopeć, A, Wojewódka, M. (2005), Pracownicze programy emerytalne. Komentarz, C.H. Beck, Warszawa.

Księżopolski, M. (1999), Social Policy. Selected problems of international comparisons, Wydawnictwo Śląsk, Katowice.

Meerten, H. van (2023), Lessons from the Pan-European Personal Pension product (PEPP), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4616643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4616643

Oręziak, L. (2013), Otwarte Fundusze Emerytalne – efekt prywatyzacji emerytur, “Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna”, 2, pp. 7–30.

Pelc, P. (2023), Ogólnoeuropejski indywidualny produkt emerytalny w polskim systemie emerytalnym i prawnym, “Cybersecurity and Law”, 10 (2), pp. 384–397, https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20311608.pdf (accessed: 2.01.2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35467/cal/174950

PFR Portal PPK (2023), “Biuletyn miesięczny Pracowniczych Planów Kapitałowych”, 1 (15), https://www.mojeppk.pl/pliki/repozytorium-plikow/materialy-do-pobrania/pdf/Biuletyn-PPK-1-2023.pdf (accessed: 31.08.2024).

Poteraj, J. (2008), Pension Systems in 27 EU Countries, The Association of Polish Scientists of Lithuania, Vilnius.

Poteraj, J. (2009), Systemy emerytalne w Europie – Czechy, “Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy”, 14, pp. 254–265, https://www.ur.edu.pl/files/ur/import/Zeszyty/zeszyt-14/20.pdf (accessed: 31.08.2024).

Poulle, J.B., Kannan, A., Spitz, N., Kahn, S., Sotiropoulou, A. (2024), Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) Regulation, [in:] J.-B. Poulle, A. Kannan, N. Spitz, S. Kahn, A. Sotiropoulou, EU Banking and Financial Regulation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 496–502, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301959.00067

Seth Khanna, P. (2023), Templatizing micro-Pensions for Africa, https://www.pinboxsolutions.com/resources/books/book-africa/ (accessed: 31.08.2024).

Socialna Poistovna (2024), Štatistiky, https://socpoist.sk/sp-transparentne/statistiky (accessed: 31.08.2024).

Szczepański, M. (2010), Stimulators and barriers of development of occupational pension systems on the example of Poland, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań.

Šebo, J., Danková, D., Králik, I. (2020), In Search of the Optimal Saving Strategy for Pan-European Pension Products, “Financial Assets and Investing”, 11 (2), pp. 54–72, https://doi.org/10.5817/FAI2020-2-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/FAI2020-2-4

Waliszewski, K., Banaś, D. (2023), Implementacja Ogólnoeuropejskiego Indywidualnego Produktu Emerytalnego w Polsce – podejście regulacyjne i ekonomiczne, “Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne”, 4, pp. 33–45, https://doi.org/10.33226/0032-6186.2023.4.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33226/0032-6186.2023.4.6

Waliszewski, K., Barankiewicz, P. (2023), Rynek indywidualnych kont emerytalnych w Polsce w kontekście implementacji ogólnoeuropejskiego indywidualnego produktu emerytalnego, “Finanse i Prawo Finansowe”, 4 (40), pp. 77–103, https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.4.40.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.4.40.05

Wrzesiński, P. (2021), A pan-European individual pension product – an insurance perspective, “Prawo Asekuracyjne”, 2 (107), pp. 15–32, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.9217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.9217