The Pan-European Personal Pension Product – Managers’ Challenges and Savers’ Expectations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.28.23Keywords:
pension system, private pension schemes, PEPPAbstract
The Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) is a strategic initiative of the European Union (EU) aimed at creating a harmonized, portable pension savings framework that addresses the challenges of population aging, increased labor mobility, and the widening pension gap across Member States. This article investigates the implementation and performance of the PEPP in four EU countries – Poland, Slovakia, Croatia, and the Czech Republic – through a mixed-methods research design.
The study combines a legal and comparative analysis of national pension systems with qualitative interviews conducted with PEPP fund managers and quantitative surveys of PEPP savers. The findings reveal significant disparities in regulatory approaches, tax treatment, and supervisory frameworks between countries, which affect both the attractiveness and functionality of PEPP. Despite the shared design principles of transparency, safety, and cost-efficiency, savers’ expectations differ notably across countries – especially in relation to customer service, information delivery, and minimum return expectations – while also being shaped by sociodemographic factors.
The qualitative research highlights that fund managers face challenges such as regulatory fragmentation, high administrative burdens, and competition from national products with more favorable tax treatment or employer-based incentives. At the same time, digital tools and passive investment strategies are seen as key to enhancing PEPP’s scalability and efficiency.
The article concludes that for PEPP to succeed as a truly pan-European product, further regulatory harmonization, consistent tax incentives, and comprehensive financial education efforts are essential. The authors also propose that increased provider competition and adaptive national policies could accelerate the product’s uptake. The study offers practical insights for EU policymakers, national regulators, and financial institutions aiming to promote inclusive and sustainable retirement savings across the continent.
Downloads
References
Akerlof, G.A., Shiller, R.J. (2015), Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton University Press, Princeton, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc777w8
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc777w8
Anioł, W. (2013), The Norden Route. Modernizacja po skandynawsku, Elipsa, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Baggio, T. (2023), The role of Capital Market Union in the Pan-European Pension Product, Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia.
Google Scholar
Barr, N. (1993), Economics of social policy, Academy of Economics, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Bär, M. (2022), The pan-European Personal Pension Product: key characteristics and main challenges, “Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft”, 111 (3), pp. 305–337, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-022-00535-2
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-022-00535-2
Better Finance (2023), Will you afford to retire? The Real Return of Long-term and Pension Savings, https://betterfinance.eu/wp-content/uploads/PSR23_Croatia.pdf (accessed: 31.08.2024).
Google Scholar
Borg, K., Minto, A., Meerten, H. van (2019), The EU’s Regulatory Commitment to a European Harmonized Pension Product (PEPP): The Portability of Pension Rights vis-à-vis the Free Movement of Capital, “Journal of Financial Regulation”, 5(2), pp. 150–178, https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjz005
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjz005
Butler, G. (2021), Private Pensions and EU Internal Market Law: Enhancing Retirement Provision through Harmonisation, “European Business Law Review”, 32 (5), pp. 853–876, https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr202103
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EULR2021030
Castles, F. (2000), Comparative Public Policy. Patterns of Post-war Transformation, Edward Elgar, Northampton.
Google Scholar
Dieleman, B. (2020), Tax treatment of the PEPP: the new pan-European Personal Pension Product, “Ec Tax Review”, 29 (3), pp. 111–116, https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2020037
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ECTA2020037
Dimitrov, S. (2021), Role of tax incentives for increase in personal pensions saving, “VUZF Review”, 6 (4), pp. 175–184, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/549310-role-of-tax-incentives-for-increase-in-p-10fe31c7.pdf (accessed: 13.01.2025).
Google Scholar
EIOPA(2024), Own-initiative OPSG Discussion Paper. Pan-European Pension Product Market development, Challenges, Obstacles, Solution, Occupational Pensions Stakeholder Group, Frankfurt, https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/document/download/88c75466-65ac-422c-a0bd-0c0b178db8fb_en?filename=OPSG-2024-21%20OPSG_Own-initiative%20Discussion%20Paper%20on%20Pan-European%20Pension%20Product%20-%20Market%20development%2C%20Challenges%2C%20Obstacles%2C%20Solutions.pdf (accessed: 4.01.2025).
Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2010), Three worlds of the capitalist welfare state, Difin, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Hadad, E., Dimitrov, S., Stoilova-Nikolova, J. (2022), Development of capital pension funds in the Czech Republic and Bulgaria and readiness to implement PEPP, “European Journal of Social Security”, 24 (4), pp. 342–360, https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627221150542
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627221150542
Hill, M. (2010), Polityka społeczna we współczesnym świecie. Analiza porównawcza, Difin, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Kaleta, P. (2021), Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) – an outline, “Ubezpieczenia Społeczne. Teoria i praktyka”, 148 (1), pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8336
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8336
Kawinski, M., Szumlicz, T., Więckowska, B. (2019), Doubt insurance in the social security system, “Social Policy”, 545 (8), pp. 8–17.
Google Scholar
Kochaniak, K., Korzeniowska, A.M., Huterska, A.A., Demirhan, D., Susmuş, T. (2023), Does the Pan-European Personal Pension Product Suit All? Its Perspectives in the EU Member and Candidate Countries, “Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe”, 26 (4), pp. 141–162, https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.35
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.35
Kolek, A., Sobolewski, O. (2022), OFE, PPK, IKE(+) – zmiany w systemie emerytalnym 2019–2021 – analiza prawno-ekonomiczna, “Monitor Prawniczy. Dodatek”, 4.
Google Scholar
Kopeć, A, Wojewódka, M. (2005), Pracownicze programy emerytalne. Komentarz, C.H. Beck, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Księżopolski, M. (1999), Social Policy. Selected problems of international comparisons, Wydawnictwo Śląsk, Katowice.
Google Scholar
Meerten, H. van (2023), Lessons from the Pan-European Personal Pension product (PEPP), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4616643
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4616643
Oręziak, L. (2013), Otwarte Fundusze Emerytalne – efekt prywatyzacji emerytur, “Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna”, 2, pp. 7–30.
Google Scholar
Pelc, P. (2023), Ogólnoeuropejski indywidualny produkt emerytalny w polskim systemie emerytalnym i prawnym, “Cybersecurity and Law”, 10 (2), pp. 384–397, https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20311608.pdf (accessed: 2.01.2025).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35467/cal/174950
PFR Portal PPK (2023), “Biuletyn miesięczny Pracowniczych Planów Kapitałowych”, 1 (15), https://www.mojeppk.pl/pliki/repozytorium-plikow/materialy-do-pobrania/pdf/Biuletyn-PPK-1-2023.pdf (accessed: 31.08.2024).
Google Scholar
Poteraj, J. (2008), Pension Systems in 27 EU Countries, The Association of Polish Scientists of Lithuania, Vilnius.
Google Scholar
Poteraj, J. (2009), Systemy emerytalne w Europie – Czechy, “Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy”, 14, pp. 254–265, https://www.ur.edu.pl/files/ur/import/Zeszyty/zeszyt-14/20.pdf (accessed: 31.08.2024).
Google Scholar
Poulle, J.B., Kannan, A., Spitz, N., Kahn, S., Sotiropoulou, A. (2024), Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) Regulation, [in:] J.-B. Poulle, A. Kannan, N. Spitz, S. Kahn, A. Sotiropoulou, EU Banking and Financial Regulation, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 496–502, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301959
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301959.00067
Seth Khanna, P. (2023), Templatizing micro-Pensions for Africa, https://www.pinboxsolutions.com/resources/books/book-africa/ (accessed: 31.08.2024).
Google Scholar
Socialna Poistovna (2024), Štatistiky, https://socpoist.sk/sp-transparentne/statistiky (accessed: 31.08.2024).
Google Scholar
Szczepański, M. (2010), Stimulators and barriers of development of occupational pension systems on the example of Poland, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Šebo, J., Danková, D., Králik, I. (2020), In Search of the Optimal Saving Strategy for Pan-European Pension Products, “Financial Assets and Investing”, 11 (2), pp. 54–72, https://doi.org/10.5817/FAI2020-2-4
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/FAI2020-2-4
Waliszewski, K., Banaś, D. (2023), Implementacja Ogólnoeuropejskiego Indywidualnego Produktu Emerytalnego w Polsce – podejście regulacyjne i ekonomiczne, “Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne”, 4, pp. 33–45, https://doi.org/10.33226/0032-6186.2023.4.6
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33226/0032-6186.2023.4.6
Waliszewski, K., Barankiewicz, P. (2023), Rynek indywidualnych kont emerytalnych w Polsce w kontekście implementacji ogólnoeuropejskiego indywidualnego produktu emerytalnego, “Finanse i Prawo Finansowe”, 4 (40), pp. 77–103, https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.4.40.05
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.4.40.05
Wrzesiński, P. (2021), A pan-European individual pension product – an insurance perspective, “Prawo Asekuracyjne”, 2 (107), pp. 15–32, https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.9217
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.9217
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

