The Shaping of Subjectivity and Biographies of Individuals in the Face of the Transformations of a Neo-Modern Society: An Introduction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.1.01

Keywords:

projectivity, biography, subjectivity, neo-modern society, narrative interview

Abstract

The presented text is an introduction to other articles included in this issue, which were prepared for the purpose of publishing the methodological and the historical-theoretical parts of the results of the research grant. Our study aimed to examine contemporary changes in subjectivity as well as explore how the subjectivity of our interlocutors emerges during narrative interviews. The first part of the article outlines the premises for the conducted research. The subsequent section presents a short argument discussing the category of “projectivity” in the context of changes in a (post-)modern society. Finally, we briefly refer to methodological issues, which are described in much greater detail in other texts presented in the issue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kamila Biały, University of Lodz, Poland

Sociologist (Department of Sociology of Art, University of Lodz), Gestalt therapist. Her area of interest is the epistemological, the methodological, and the ethical as pertaining to sociological problems inspired by contemporary phenomenology.

Piotr F. Piasek, Central China Normal University

Sociologist and philosopher (Central China Normal University). His scientific interests include ontological and epistemological problems of social sciences (phenomenology, systems theories).

Paweł Pieniążek, University of Lodz, Poland

Philosopher, associate professor at the University of Lodz (Department of Contemporary Philosophy). His research focuses on broadly-defined contemporary and late modern philosophy (French and German) from the existential perspective as well as on the philosophical and cultural aspects of modernity.

References

Alheit Peter (1994), Taking the Knocks. Youth Unemployment and Biography – A Qualitative Analysis, London: Cassell.
Google Scholar

Alheit Peter (2000), Die biographische Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Überlegungen zur Biographizität des Sozialen, [in:] Erika Hoerning (ed.), Biographische Sozialisation, Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, pp. 257–307.
Google Scholar

Alheit Peter (2021), The transitional potential of ‘biographicity’, “Dyskursy Młodych Andragogów”, vol. 22, pp. 113–123, https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2130639 (accessed: 20.10.2023).
Google Scholar

Arthur Michael B., Rousseau Denise M. (1996), The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Bauman Zygmunt (2006), Płynna nowoczesność, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Beck Ulrich, Bonss Wolfgang, Lau Christoph (2001), Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung – Fragestellungen, Hypothesen, Forschungsprogramme, [in:] Ulrich Beck, Wolfgang Bonss (eds.), Die Modernisierung der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 11–62.
Google Scholar

Birken Thomas (2012), Projektarbeit – arbeitssoziologisch gedeutet, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288489694_Projektarbeit_-_arbeitssoziologisch_gedeutet (accessed: 12.10.2023).
Google Scholar

Boltanski Luc (2007), Leben als Projekt. Prekarität in der schönen neuen Netzwerkwelt, “Polar” #2, pp. 7–13, http://www.polar-zeitschrift.de/polar_02.php?id=69#69 (accessed: 12.10.2023).
Google Scholar

Boltanski Luc, Chiapello Ève (1999), Der neue Geist des Kapitalismus, Konstanz: UVK.
Google Scholar

Boltanski Luc, Thévenot Laurent (1991), De la justification, Paris: Gallimard.
Google Scholar

Brose Hanns-Georg, Wohlrab-Sahr Monika, Corsten Michael (1993), Soziale Zeit und Biographie, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Google Scholar

Bröckling Ulrich (2005), Projektwelten. Anatomie einer Vergesellschaftungsform, “Leviathan”, vol. 33(3), pp. 364–383.
Google Scholar

Chiapello Ève, Fairclough Norman (2002), Understanding the new management ideology: a transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism, “Discourse and Society”, vol. 13(2), pp. 185–208.
Google Scholar

Cicmil Svetlana, Lindgren Monica, Packendorff Johann (2016), The project (management) discourse and its consequences: on vulnerability and unsustainability in project-based work, “New Technology, Work and Employment”, vol. 31(1), pp. 58–76.
Google Scholar

Dörre Klaus, Lessenich Stephan, Rosa Hartmut (2015), Sociology – Capitalism – Critique, London–New York: Verso.
Google Scholar

Evans James A., Kunda Gideon, Barley Stephen R. (2004), Beach Time, Bridge Time, and Billable Hours: The Temporal Structure of Technical Contracting, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, vol. 49(1), pp. 1–38.
Google Scholar

Giddens Anthony (1991), Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Jones Candace (1996), Careers in project networks: The case of the film industry, [in:] Michael B. Arthur, Denise M. Rousseau (eds.), The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–75.
Google Scholar

Kanter Rosabeth M. (1995), Nice work if you can get it: The software industry as a model for tomorrows jobs, “American Prospect”, no. 23, pp. 52–58.
Google Scholar

Kohli Martin (2007), The Institutionalization of the Life Course: Looking Back to Look Ahead, “Research in Human Development”, vol. 4(3–4), pp. 253–271.
Google Scholar

Kollmorgen Raj (2004), Neo-Modernity. Theory and Practice, [in:] Johannes Angermüller, Dirk Wiemann, Raj Kollmorgen, Jorg Meyer (eds.), Reflexive Representations. Politics, Hegemony and Discourse in Global Capitalism, Münster: LIT, pp. 169–185.
Google Scholar

Kollmorgen Raj (2011), Die Zeit des Kapitalismus. (Post-)Moderne Kapitalismustheorie – mit, gegen und nach Marx, “Berliner Debatte – Initial”, vol. 22(4), pp. 40–55.
Google Scholar

Ladwig Désirée, Kunze Jürgen, Hartmann Michael (2011), Exit matters – auf dem Weg in die Projektgesellschaft, Frankfurt–Berlin–Bern–Bruxelles–New York–Oxford–Wien: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Packendorff Johann (1995), Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research, “Scandinavian Journal of Management”, vol. 11(4), pp. 319–333.
Google Scholar

Peter Gerd, Zwingmann Bruno (1982), Humanisierung der Arbeit. Probleme der Durchsetzung, Köln: Bund-Verlag.
Google Scholar

Peters Sibylle, Garrel Jörg, Düben Ansgar, Dienel Hans-Liudger (2016), Arbeit – Zeit – Souveränität: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur selbstbestimmten Projektarbeit, München–Mering: Rainer Hampp.
Google Scholar

Pippin Robert B. (2005), The Persistence of Subjectivity. On the Kantian Aftermath, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Rosa Hartmut (2005), Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Google Scholar

Rose Nikolas (1989), Governing the Soul, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Strauss Anselm (1988), The articulation of project work: An organizational process, “Sociological Quarterly”, vol. 29(2), pp. 163–178.
Google Scholar

Szreder Kuba (2016), ABC Projektariatu. O nędzy projektowego życia, Warszawa: Fundacja Bęc Zmiana.
Google Scholar

Wagner Peter (1995), Soziologie der Moderne. Freiheit und Disziplin, Frankfurt am Main–New York: Campus.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28 — Updated on 2024-03-14

Versions

How to Cite

Biały, K., Piasek, P. F., & Pieniążek, P. (2024). The Shaping of Subjectivity and Biographies of Individuals in the Face of the Transformations of a Neo-Modern Society: An Introduction. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 20(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.1.01 (Original work published February 28, 2024)

Issue

Section

Numer tematyczny „Subjectivity, Projectivity, Biography in the Face of Changes in Late-Modern Society” edited by Kamila Biały, Piotr F. Piasek & Paweł Pieniążek

Funding data

Most read articles by the same author(s)