Obligation to rules or account of consequences? – Ethical context abortion’s decisions participants of internet forum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.40.15

Abstract

This article presents the results of the analysis of media discourse around the issue of abortion, women's speech as presented on the pages of the discussion forum ABORTION, functioning on the web portal www.gazeta.pl. The primary objective of this study is to diagnose the causes of abortion decision-making by the participants of this forum. Verbalized positioned determinants of abortion in the context of considerations of a moral (right to life, consequentialism and deontological ethics). Assumptions consequentialism and deontological ethics – as an ethical context for women's right to carry out abortions – were assigned to two, opposed in public discourse in Poland standpoints: the defenders of life – pro-life groups representing the deontological approach to the issue of abortion, and the defenders of free pro-choice groups (consequentialism). After this analysis we can say that in public discourse on the issue of abortion in the analyzed online forum made it clear in the context of ethical considerations, including the nature of both topics consequential and deontological, and above all stressed the basic idea of ethics of rights – the question of the right of the unborn child to life and the scope of this right. 

References

Castells M., 2007, Społeczeństwo sieci, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Gałuszka Mieczysław, 2003, Społeczne i kulturowe powinności medycyny, Wrocławskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Inglik-Dziąg Dorota, 2010, Obyczaje, problemy i zasady społeczne w dyskursie medialnym Polaków – analiza wątków problematyki społecznej najczęściej komentowanych na forum internetowym, [w:] D. Walczak-Duraj (red.), Społeczeństwo wobec wyzwań współczesności. Wybrane podejścia badawcze i interpretacyjne, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź.
Google Scholar

Opinie na temat dopuszczalności aborcji, 2010, Raport CBOS, [za:] http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2010/K_100_10.PDF
Google Scholar

Singer P. (red.), 2009, Przewodnik po etyce, wyd. IV, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Szewczyk Kazimierz, 2009, Medycyna na granicach Życia, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Teichman J., 2002, Etyka społeczna, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Warren Marry A., 2009, Przerywanie ciąży, [w:] P. Singer (red.), Przewodnik o etyce, wyd. IV, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

DzU 1956, Nr 12, poz. 61, [za:] http://isap.sejm.gov.pl
Google Scholar

DzU 1993, Nr 17, poz. 78, [za:] http://isap.sejm.gov.pl
Google Scholar

DzU 1997, Nr 157, poz. 1040, [za:] http://isap.sejm.gov.pl
Google Scholar

http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/Druki5ka.nsf/0/79EB9DAFA9F1849FC12571F60033806C/$file/993.pdf
Google Scholar

http://www.federa.org.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=10
Google Scholar

Published

2012-03-30

How to Cite

Inglik-Dziąg, D. (2012). Obligation to rules or account of consequences? – Ethical context abortion’s decisions participants of internet forum. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, (40), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.40.15