Engaging Teams: Missions, Management and Everyday Life

Scott Grills

doi:10.18778/0208-600X.81.04

Autor

Scott Grills Brandon University, Department of Sociology, 270-18th Street, Brandon, MB, Canada, R7A 6A9 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2596-2068

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.81.04

Słowa kluczowe:

generyczny proces społeczny, zarządzanie, interakcja symboliczna, poufność, zespoły

Abstrakt

Nawiązując do rozszerzonej tradycji interakcjonizmu symbolicznego, w zaprezentowanym artykule analizie poddane zostały działania zarządcze w kontekście aktywności osób zarządzających zespołami i funkcjonowania tychże zespołów. Jako badacze, jeśli chcemy w pełni zrozumieć zasady i funkcje zarządzania w życiu codziennym, musimy zwrócić szczególną uwagę na zespoły, proces ich tworzenia i pracę zespołową, ponieważ życie organizacyjne urzeczywistnia się poprzez wspólne działanie ludzi. W szczególności analizie poddane zostało znaczenie zespołów wykonawczych, zespołów o charakterze dziedzicznym (legacy teams), zespołów powołanych na mocy prawa (legislated teams), zespołów opierających się na misji (mission-based teams) oraz znaczenie zasady poufności dla zespołów uchwałodawczych (enacting teams). Zachęcając do zwrócenia uwagi na perspektywy i działania osób zarządzających, proponuję w artykule odejście od strukturalnych ujęć życia organizacyjnego na rzecz zwrócenia uwagi na zarządzanie w procesie tworzenia.

Bibliografia

Becker H.S. (1982), Art Worlds, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Becker H.S. (2014), What About Mozart? What About Murder?: Reasoning From Cases, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226166520.001.0001

Becker H.S., Geer B., Hughes E.C. (1968), Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life, Wiley, New York.

Becker H.S., Geer B., Hughes E.C., Strauss A. (1961), The Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Bennett R. (2003), Competitor Analysis Practices of British Charities, “Marketing Intelligence & Planning”, vol. 21(6), pp. 335–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500310499194

Blumer H. (1947), Sociological Theory in Industrial Relations, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 12(3), pp. 271–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086516

Blumer H. (1954), What is Wrong with Social Theory?, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 19(1), pp. 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165

Blumer H. (1969), Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Dingwall R., Strong P.M. (1985), The Interactional Study of Organizations: A Critique and Reformulation, “Journal of Contemporary Ethnography”, vol. 14(2), pp. 205–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124168501400204

Edgerton R.B. (1967), The Cloak of Competence: Stigma in the Lives of the Mentally Retarded, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Faulkner R. (2009), On Sensitizing Concepts, [in:] A.J. Puddephatt, W. Shaffir, S.W. Kleinknecht (eds.), Ethnographies Revisited: Constructing Theory in the Field, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp. 79–91.

Fine G.A. (1996), Kitchens: The Culture of Restaurant Work, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Goffman E. (1956), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre, Monograph No. 2, Edinburgh.

Goffman E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Anchor Books, New York.

Goffman E. (1969), Strategic Interaction, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

Gómez-Zará D., Andreoli S., DeChurch L.A., Contractor N.S. (2019), Discovering Collaborators Online: Assembling Interdisciplinary Teams Online at an Argentinian University, “Cuadernos. info”, vol. 44(1), pp. 21–41, https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.44.1575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.44.1575

Grills S. (2020a), The Virtue of Patience, “Qualitative Sociology Review”, vol. 16(2), pp. 28–39, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.2.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.16.2.03

Grills S. (2020b), Understanding Everyday Life: Generic Social processes and the Pursuit of Transcontextuality, “Symbolic Interaction”, vol. 43(4), pp. 615–636, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/symb.468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.468

Grills S. (2022), Dominance Encounters in University Management, [in:] D. Poff (ed.), University Corporate Social Responsibility and University Governance, Springer International Publishing, Cham [in press]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77532-2_7

Grills S., Prus R. (2019), Management Motifs: An Interactionist Approach for the Study of Organizational Interchange, Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93429-7

Haas J., Shaffir W. (1987), Becoming Doctors: The Adoption of a Cloak of Competence, JAI Press, Greenwich.

Hall E.T., Gray S., Martindale A., Sproule J., Kelly J., Potrac P. (2021), Doing Hybrid Management Work in Elite Sport: The Case of a Head Coach in Top-Level Rugby Union, “Sport Management Review”, vol. 24(2), pp. 271–296, https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1880690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1880690

Hewitt J.P., Stokes R. (1975), Disclaimers, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 40(1), pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094442

Holyfield L. (1999), Manufacturing Adventure: The Buying and Selling of Emotions, “Journal of Contemporary Ethnography”, vol. 28(1), pp. 3–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199129023352

van den Hoonaard W.C. (1997), Working with Sensitizing Concepts: Analytical Field Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks.

van den Hoonaard W.C. (ed.) (2002), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, University of Toronto Press, Toronto. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442683204

Horowitz R. (2012), In the Public Interest: Medical Licensing and the Disciplinary Process, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.

Hughes E.C. (1937), Institutional Office and the Person, “American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 43(3), pp. 404–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/217711

Jaworski G.D. (2021), Goffman’s Interest in Spies and Espionage: The University of Chicago Context, “Symbolic Interaction”, vol. 44(2), pp. 392–411, https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.498

Lemert E.M. (1962), Paranoia and the Dynamics of Exclusion, “Sociometry”, vol. 25(1), pp. 2–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786032

Maines D.R. (2001), The Faultline of Consciousness: A View of Interactionism in Sociology, Transaction Publishers, Piscataway.

Meehan A.J. (1992), “I Don’t Prevent Crime, I Prevent Calls”: Policing as a Negotiated Order, “Symbolic Interaction”, vol. 15(4), pp. 455–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1992.15.4.455

Mills C.W. (1940), Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 5(6), pp. 904–913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524

Prus R. (1996), Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience, State University of New York Press, Albany.

Prus R. (1997), Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities: An Ethnographic Research Agenda for Pragmatizing the Social Sciences, State University of New York Press, Albany.

Prus R. (1999), Beyond the Power Mystique: Power as Intersubjective Accomplishment, State University of New York Press, Albany.

Prus R., Sharper C.R.D. (1991), Road Hustler: Hustlers, Magic and the Thief Subculture, Kaufman and Greenberg, New York.

Samier E.A. (2014), Secrecy and Tradecraft in Educational Administration: The Covert Side of Educational Life, Routledge, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203387085

Scott M.B., Lyman S.M. (1968), Accounts, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 33(1), pp. 46–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239

Scott S. (2018), A Sociology of Nothing: Understanding the Unmarked, “Sociology”, vol. 52(1), pp. 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517690681

Sebag-Montefiore H. (2011), Enigma: The Battle for the Code, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.

Shaffir W. (1998), Doing Ethnographic Research in Jewish Orthodox Communities: The Neglected Role of Sociability, [in:] S. Grills (ed.), Doing Ethnographic Research: Fieldwork Settings, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 48–64.

Simmel G. (1906), The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies, “The American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 441–498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/211418

Simmel G. (1950), The Sociology of George Simmel, transl. and ed. K.H. Wolf, Free Press, New York.

Smith R.J. (2011), Goffman’s Interaction Order at the Margins: Stigma, Role, and Normalization in the Outreach Encounter, “Symbolic Interaction”, vol. 34(3), pp. 357–376, https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2011.34.3.357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2011.34.3.357

Strategic Services – Provisional (1944), Strategic Service Field Manual, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/26184/page-images/26184-images.pdf (accessed: 28.01.2022).

Sutherland E. (1949), White Collar Crime, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

Vaz E. (1982), The Professionalization of Young Hockey Players, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

Wolf D. (1991), The Rebels: A Brotherhood of Outlaw Bikers, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.