Animals as Online Resources for Human Storytelling. Between Exploitation and Anthrozoological Empowerment

Iris Bauer

doi:10.18778/2299-7458.13.04

Autor

Iris Bauer Leipzig University https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8247-0656

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2299-7458.13.04

Słowa kluczowe:

human-animal studies, cultural animal studies, social media, human-animal lifewriting, anthrozoological empowerment, posthumanity

Abstrakt

The paper deals with online representations of animals and examines the extent to which the digital age, with its media and specific characteristics, influences the representation of animals. The text introduces the basic questions of human animal studies, using Randy Malamud’s virtual animal concept to scrutinise online representations of animals in social media. Based on Spivak’s concept of subalternity, online-animals are discussed as subaltern representations, that are instrumentalised in human story telling: as an economic resource, as a projection surface for individual life writing and identity creation and as a means of social networking. Yet social media are also discussed as a space in which anthrozoological empowerment can take place. Based on Kari Weil’s concept of the contact zone, the virtual animal is discussed as a space of possibilities for a posthuman language that, with the help of digital possibilities of representation, unsettles anthropocentric hegemony.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

Iris Bauer - Leipzig University

Iris Bauer is a postdoctoral researcher within Slavic literary and cultural studies at the Institute for Slavonic Studies at the university of Leipzig. Her research focus is on contemporary Polish literature, gender/queer studies, ecocriticism and Holocaust literature. Her latest book Bombenlegerinnen, Möderinnen und Rebellinnen – Transgressionen bei Maria Janion und Sylwia Chutnik (Wallstein 2025) is to be published.

Bibliografia

Bergthaller, Hannes. “On the Margins of Ecocriticism. A European Perspective.” In Literatur Und Ökologie: Neue Literatur- Und Kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven. Edited by Claudia Schmitt, Christiane Solte-Gresser. Bielefeld: Aisthesis, 2017, 55–64.

Companion Life, New data reveals the highest earning dog-fluencers in 2023 – with Instagram taking top spot over TikTok. https://www.companionlife.co.uk/new-data-reveals-the-highest-earning-dog-fluencers-in-2023-with-instagram-taking-top-spot-over-tiktok/ (accessed on 08.11.2023).

DeMello, Margo. “Identity, Community and Grief. The role of Bunspace in the lives of people and rabbits.” In Speaking for Animals. Animal Autobiographical Writing. Edited by Margo DeMello. New York: Routledge 2013, 115–129.

DeMello, Margo. “Introduction.” In Speaking for Animals. Animal Autobiographical Writing. Edited by Margo DeMello. New York: Routledge 2013, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203085967

Fudge, Erica. Animal. London: Reaktion Books, 2002.

Hark, Sabine. “Die Vermessung des Schweigens – oder: Was heißt sprechen? Dimensionen epistemischer Gewalt.” In Dominanzkultur reloaded. Neue Texte zu gesellschaftlichen Machtverhältnissen und ihren Wechselwirkungen. Edited by Iman Attia, Swantja Köbsell, Nivedity Prasad. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2015, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839430613-021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839430613-021

Kuznietsova, Tatyana V.; Podolian, Aleksandra V. “‘Who Guards this Neighbourhood? – Patron the Dog!’: How Visual Imagery Spreads Ukraine’s Strategic Narratives during the War.” Теорія та історія соціальних комунікацій [Teorìâ ta ìstorìâ socìal’nih komunìkacìj], 2023, issue 34/6 (2023), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.6/33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.6/33

Malamud, Randy. An Introduction to Animals and Visual Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009845

Malamud, Randy. “Poetic Animals and Animal Souls.” Society & Animals, issue 6/3 (1998), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853098X00195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853098X00195

Moreno, Megan A.; D’Angelo, Jonathan D. “Digital Media Theory. From One-Way to Multidirectional Communication.” In Handbook of Visual Communication. Theory, Methods and Media. Edited by Sheree Josephson, James Kelly, Ken Smith. New York: Routledge, 2020, 323–333. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491115-30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491115-30

Schaber, Peter. “Instrumentalisierung.” In Lexikon der Mensch-Tier-Beziehungen. Edited by Arianna Ferrari, Klaus Petrus. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2025, 165–167. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839422328-049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839422328-049

Schally, Jennifer L.; Couch, Stephen R. “Catster.com: Creating Feline Identities.” In Speaking for Animals. Animal Autobiographical Writing. Edited by Margo DeMello, 103–113. New York: Routledge, 2013.

Shapiro, Kenneth; Copeland, Marion W. “Toward a Critical Theory of Animal Issues in Fiction.” Society & Animals, issue 13/4 (2005): 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853005774653636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853005774653636

Shevchenko, Vitaly. “Cat and dog influencers help Ukrainians cope with war.” BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66509999 (accessed on 19.08.2023).

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?: Reflections on the History of an Idea.” In Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory. A Reader. Edited by Patrick Williams, Laura Chrisman. New York: Routledge, 1994, 66–111.

Tokarczuk, Olga. The tender narrator. Nobelprize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2018/tokarczuk/lecture/ (accessed on 07.12.2019).

Weil, Kari. Thinking Animals. Why Animal Studies Now? New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

Weiss, David. “Refusing to name the animals.” Gettysburg Review, issue 3 (1990), 233–241.

Wilkinson, Christine. “Public Interest in in Individual Study Animals Can Bolster Wildlife Conservation.” Nature Ecology & Evolution, issue 7 (2023), 478–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02009-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02009-9