Prenatal „indywidualized growth curve standards” and errors in fetal conceptual age assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.58.05Abstract
The paper presents some important, but as yet insufficiently solved, methodological problems of anatomical and ultrasound fetal growth research.
Downloads
References
Altman D.G., L.S. CmTTY , 1994, Charts of fetal size: 1, Methodology, 101, 29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13006.x
BRENNER W.E. i wsp., 1976, A standard of fetal growth fo r the United States o f America, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 126, 555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(76)90748-1
Chitty L.S. i wsp., 1993, Fetal biometry, [w:] Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Oynecology, (Eds) F.A. Chervenak, G.C. Isaacson i S. Campbell. Little, Brown and Company. Boston, Toronto, London, 1777
Chitty L.S. i wsp., 1994, Charts o f feta l size: 2. Head measurements; 3. Abdominal measurements; 4. Femur Length, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 101, 35-43, 125-31, 132-35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13007.x
Daya S., 1993, Accuracy o f gestational age estimation by means of fetal crownrump lenth measurement, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 168, 903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(12)90842-X
Deter R.L. i I.K. Rossavik , 1987, A simplified method for determining individual growth curve standards, Obstet. Gynecol. 70, 801
Deter R.L. i Harrist, 1993, Assesment of normal fetal growth, [w:] Ultrasound in Obstetrics and
Gynecology, (Eds) F.A. Chervenak, G.C. Isaacson, S. Campbell. Little, Brown and Company. Boston, Toronto, London, 361
Iffy L., A. Jakobovttz, W. Westlake i wsp., 1975, Early intrauterine development: 1. The rate of growth of Caucasian embryos and fetuses between the 6th and 20th weeks of gestation, Pediatrics, 56, 2, 173
Jakobovitz A., W. Westlake, L. Iffy i wsp., 1976, Early intrauterine development: II. The rate o f growth in black and central american populations between 10 and 20 weeks gestation, Pediatrics, 58, 833
Jeanty P. i wsp., 1984, A longitudinal study of fetal head biometry, Am. J . Perinatology 1, 2, 118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-999987
Persson P.H., L. Grennert, G. Gennser, B. , 1978, Normal range curves fo r the intrauterine growth of the biparietal diameter, Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. Suppl. 78, 15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016347809162697
Rossavik I.K., R.L. Deter , 1984, Mathematical modeling o f Fetal Growth: I Basic Principles; II Head Cube (A), Abdominal Cube (B), and their ratio (AIB), J . Clin. Ultrasound 12, 529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870120902
Rossavik I.K., R.L. Deter , F.P. Hadlock, 1987, Mathematical Modeling o f Fetal Growth. III. Evaluation of head growth using the head profit area; IV. Evaluation of trunk growth using the abdominal profile area, J . Clin. Ultrasound. 15, 23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870150106
Rossavik I.K., R.L . Deter , N. Wasserstrum, 1988, Mathematical Modeling o f Fetal Growth: V. Fetal weight changes at term, J. Clin. Ultrasound, 16, 9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870160103
Shiota K., 1991, Development and intrauterine fate of normal and abnormal human conceptuses, Cong. Anom., 31, 67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4520.1991.tb00360.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
