The impact of maternal age on foetal growth patterns and newborn size

Franziska Kirchweger; Sylvia Kirchengast; Erich Hafner; Ingrid Stümpflein; Beda Hartmann

doi:10.2478/anre-2018-0009

Authors

Franziska Kirchweger University of Vienna, Department of Anthropology
Sylvia Kirchengast University of Vienna, Department of Anthropology
Erich Hafner Danube Hospital, Vienna, Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Ingrid Stümpflein Danube Hospital, Vienna, Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Beda Hartmann Danube Hospital, Vienna, Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0009

Keywords:

foetal growth patterns, newborn size, teenage mothers, maternal age, foetal biometry

Abstract

The association patterns between maternal age and foetal growth parameters as well as newborn size were analysed using a dataset of 4737 singleton term births taking place at the Viennese Danube hospital. Foetal growth patterns were reconstructed by the results of three ultrasound examinations carried out at the 11th/12th, 20th/21th and 32th/33thweek of gestation. In detail, crown-rump length, biparietal diameter, fronto-occipital diameter, head circumference, abdominal transverse diameter, abdominal anterior-posterior diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length were determined. Birth weight, birth length and head circumference were measured immediately after birth. Young teenage mothers (≤15 years), older adolescent mothers (16-19 years), mothers of optimal age range (20-35 years) and mothers of advanced age (>35 years) differed significantly in body height, pre-pregnancy weight status and gestational weight gain. Surprisingly, the foetuses of young adolescent mothers were the largest ones during first trimester. During the second and third trimester however, the foetuses of mothers of optimal age range (20-35 years) and mothers older than 35 years showed larger biometric dimensions than adolescent mothers. According to multiple regression analyses, maternal age was significantly related to Foetal head size (ß =-0.04; 95% CI = -0,08 – 0.01; p=0.034) and abdominal dimensions (ß= 0.03; 95% CI = 0.01-0.05; p=0,011) during the second trimester and to birthweight (ß= -0.03; 95% CI= -4.40 – 0.04; p=0.050). The associations however, are quite weak and the statistical significance is maybe due to the large sample size. At the time of birth, offspring of mothers of optimal age range (20 to 35 years) is significantly larger than that of adolescent mothers and mothers of advanced age. Mothers of advanced age showed the significantly highest (p=<0.0001) prevalence (5.6%) of SGA newborns (<2500g). The small size of newborn among young adolescent mothers may be due to a competition over nutrients between the still growing mothers and the foetuses during the third trimester, while placental ageing may be responsible for smaller size of offspring among mothers of advanced age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdella RMA, Ahmed SAM, Moustafa MI. 2014. Sonographic evaluation of foetal abdominal circumference and cerebro-placental Doppler indices for prediction of foetal macrosomia in full term pregnant women. Cohort study. Middle East Fert Soc J 19:69-74.
View in Google Scholar

Aliyu MH, Salihu HM, Wilson RE, Alio AP, Kirby RS (2008) The risk of intrapartum stillbirth among smokers of advanced maternal age. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278:39–45.
View in Google Scholar

Alves J, Siqueira L, Melo L, Figueiroa J. 2013. Smaller pelvic size in pregnant adolescents contributes to lower birth weight. International Journal of Adolescent. Med Health 25:139-142.
View in Google Scholar

American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2014. Female age-related fertility decline. Commitee Opinion No. 589. Obstet Gynecol 123:719-21.
View in Google Scholar

Amini S, Catalano P, Dierker L, Mann L. 1996. Births to teenagers: Trends and obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 87: 668-74.
View in Google Scholar

Bakker R, Steegers E, Biharie A, MacKenbach J, Hofman A, Jaddoe V 2011. Explaining differences in birth outcomes in relation to maternal age: The Generation R Study. BJOG 118:500-9.
View in Google Scholar

Balasch J. 2010. Ageing and infertility: an overview. Gynecolog Endocrinol Early Online: 1-6.
View in Google Scholar

Barclay K, Myrskylä M. 2016. advanced maternal age and offspring outcomes: reproductive aging and counterbalancing period trends. Population Develop Rev 42(1):69–94.
View in Google Scholar

Blomberg M, Tyrberg R, Kjlhede P. 2014. Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: A Swedish medical birth register study. Brit Med J Open 4:11.
View in Google Scholar

Briggs M, Hopman W, Jamison M. 2007. Comparing pregnancy in adolescents and adults Obstetric outcomes and prevalence of anaemia. J Obstet Gyneol Canada 29:546-55.
View in Google Scholar

Care A, Bourque S, Morton J, Hjartaron E, Daidge S. 2015. Effect of advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcomes and vascular function in the rat. Hypertension 65:1324-30.
View in Google Scholar

Carolan M. 2013. Maternal age 45 years and maternal and perinatal outcomes: A review of the evidence. Midwifery 29:479-89.
View in Google Scholar

Chan BP, Lao TH. 2008. Effect of parity and advanced maternal age on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet 102:237-41.
View in Google Scholar

Cleary-Goldman J, Malone F, Vidaver J, Ball R, Nyberg D, Comstock C, Saade G, Eddleman K, Klugman S, Bugoff L, Timor-Tritsch I, Craigo S, Carr S, Wolfe H, Binchi D, DÁlton M 2005. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105:983-90.
View in Google Scholar

Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, De B, Temmerman M. 2007. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135:41-6.
View in Google Scholar

Demirci O., Ylmaz, E, Tosun, Kumru P, Arnkan A, Mahmutolu D, Seluk S, Dolgun Z, Arsoy R, Erdodu E, Tarhan N. 2016. Effect of young maternal age on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: Results from the tertiary center in Turkey. Balkan Med J 33:344-9.
View in Google Scholar

Drehmer M, Duncan BB, Kac G, Schmidt MI. 2013. Association of second and third trimester weight gain in pregnancy with maternal and foetal outcomes. Plos ONE 8:1-8.
View in Google Scholar

Egolf, DB, Corder LE. 1991. Height differences of low and high job status, female and male corporate employees. Sex Roles 24:365–73.
View in Google Scholar

Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Froen JF, Smith GC, et al. 2011. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet 377:1331–40.
View in Google Scholar

Forman MR, Mangini LD, Thelus-Jean R, Hayward MD. 2013. Life-course origins of the ages at menarche and menopause. Adolescent Health, Med Therap 4:1–21
View in Google Scholar

Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Ward RH. 1995. Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. New Engl J Med 2:1113-7.
View in Google Scholar

Gaman L, Lixandru D, Gilca M, Gheorgiu I, Murscurel C, Panait E, Horhoianu I, Atanasiu V, Stoian I. 2013. Placental antioxidant systems maternal age influence. Free Radical Biol Med 65:51.
View in Google Scholar

Geronimus AT. 1996. Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birth weight. A population based test of the weathering hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 42:589-97.
View in Google Scholar

Godfrey KM, Breier BH, Cooper C. 1999. Constraint of the materno-placental supply of nutrients: causes and consequences. In: PMS O’Brien, T Wheeler, and DJP Barker, editors. Fetal Programming. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. London. pp:283–98.
View in Google Scholar

Gravena AAF, de Paul MG, Marcon SS, de Carvalho MDB, Pelloso SM. 2013. Maternal age and factors associated with perinatal outcomes. Acta Paul Enferm 26:30-5.
View in Google Scholar

Gueri M, Jutsum P, Sorhaindo B. 1982. Anthropometric assessment of nutritional status in pregnant women: a reference table for weight and height per week. Am J Clin Nutr 35:609-16.
View in Google Scholar

Haavaldsen C, Samuelsen S, Eskild A. 2011. The association of maternal age with placental weight: a population-based study of 536 954 pregnancies. BJOG 118:1470-6.
View in Google Scholar

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Deter RL, Park SK. 1982a. Foetal femur length as a predictor of menstrual age: sonographically measured. Am J Roent 138:875-8.
View in Google Scholar

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Deter RL, Park SK. 1982b. Foetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relationship to menstrual age by means of real time ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1:97-104.
View in Google Scholar

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Deter RL, Park SK. 1982c. Foetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age: sonographically measured. Am J Roent 139:367-70.
View in Google Scholar

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Shah Y, Park SK. 1984. The femur length/head circumference relation in obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med 3:439-42.
View in Google Scholar

Hoffman MC, Jeffers S, Carter J, Duthely L, Cotter A. 2007. Pregnancy at or beyond age 40 years is associated with an increased risk of foetal death and other adverse outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:e11–3.
View in Google Scholar

Hsieh TT, Liou JD, Hsu JJ, Lo LM, Cheng SF, Hung TH. 2010. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome in an Asian population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 148: 21-26.
View in Google Scholar

Janssens S, Wallace KL, Chang AM 2008. Prepartum and intrapartum caesarean section rates at Mater Mothers’ Hospital Brisbane 1997–2005. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 48:564–9.
View in Google Scholar

Jahromi B, Husseini Z. 2008. Pregnancy outcome at maternal age 40 and older. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol 47:318-21.
View in Google Scholar

Johnsen S, Rasmussen S, Sollien R, Kiserud T. 2004. Foetal age assessment based on ultrasound head biometry and the effect of maternal and foetal factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:716-23.
View in Google Scholar

Johnson J, Tough S. 2012. Delayed child-bearing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 34:80-93.
View in Google Scholar

Jolly M, Sebire N, Harris J, Robinson S, Regan L 2000. The risks associated with pregnancy in women aged 35 years or older. Hum Reprod 15:2433–7.
View in Google Scholar

Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H. 2005. The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol 105:1410–8.
View in Google Scholar

Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O´Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. 2013. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: Evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PlosOne 8:e56583.
View in Google Scholar

Kirchengast S. 2009. Teenage-pregnancies - a biomedical and a sociocultural approach to a current problem. Curr Women Health Rev 5:1-7.
View in Google Scholar

Kirchengast S, Hartmann B. 2003. The impact of maternal age and maternal somatic characteristics on newborn size. Am J Hum Biol 15:220-8.
View in Google Scholar

Kirchengast S, Hartmann B 2007. Maternal stature is an important parameter for birth complications and caesarean deliveries independent of newborn anthropometric factors. Acta Medica Lithuanica14:1-6.
View in Google Scholar

Knussmann R. 1988. Somatometrie. In: R Knussmann, editor. Anthropologie. Fischer Verlag Stuttgart.
View in Google Scholar

Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Wisser J, Huch R, Huch A, Zimmermann R. 1999a. Foetal ultrasound biometry: 1 Head reference values. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 106: 126-135.
View in Google Scholar

Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Zimmermann R, Huch R, Huch A, Wisser J. 1999b. Foetal ultrasound biometry: 2 Abdomen and femur length reference values. Brit J Obstet Gynecol 106:136-43
View in Google Scholar

Lean S, Heazell A, Boscolo-Ryan J, Peacock L, Mills T, Jones R. 2014. Does alter placental morphology and function explain increased incidence of poor pregnancy outcome in advanced maternal age. Placenta 35:77.
View in Google Scholar

Lee MC, Suhng LA, Lu TH, Chou MC. 1998. Association of parental characteristics with adverse outcomes of adolescent pregnancy. Fam Pract 15:336-42.
View in Google Scholar

Medhi R, Das B, Das A, Ahmed M, Bawri S, Rai S. 2016. Adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcome in adolescent mothers associated with first birth: a hospital-based case-control study in a tertiary care hospital in North-East India. Adolescent Health, Med Therap 7:37-42.
View in Google Scholar

Metcalfe A, Tough S, Johnson J. 2013: Influence of maternal age on first trimester crown rump length and birth outcomes: a population based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42:101-2.
View in Google Scholar

Moerman M. 1982. Growth of the birth canal in adolescent girls. Am J Obstet Gynecology 143:528-32.
View in Google Scholar

Naeye R. 1983. Maternal age, obstetric complications, and the outcome of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 61:210-6.
View in Google Scholar

Newburn-Cook CV. 2005. Is older maternal age a risk factor for preterm birth and foetal growth restriction? A systematic re view. Health Care Women Int 26:852-75.
View in Google Scholar

Phipps M, Sower M 2002. Defining early adolescent childbearing Am J Public Health 92:125-8.
View in Google Scholar

Perry RL, Mannino B, Hediger ML, Scholl TO. 1996. Pregnancy in early adolescence: Are there obstetric risks? J Matern Foetal Med 5:333-9.
View in Google Scholar

Pölzlberger E, Hartmann B, Hafner E, Stümpflein I, Kirchengast, S. 2017. Maternal height and pre-pregnancy weight status are associated with foetal growth patterns and newborn size. J Biosoc Sci 49:392-407.
View in Google Scholar

O’Leary CM, Bower C, Knuiman M, Stanley FJ. 2007. Changing risks of stillbirth and neonatal mortality associated with maternal age in Western Australia 1984–2003. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21:541–49.
View in Google Scholar

Roje D, Banovic I, Tadin I, Vucinovic M, Capkun NV, Baraisic A, Vulic M, Mestrovic Z, Mimica M, Miletic T. 2004. Gestational age – the most important factor of neonatal ponderal index. Yonsei Med J 45:273-80.
View in Google Scholar

Salem Y, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Holeberg G, Mazor M, Sheiner E. 2011. A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:755-9.
View in Google Scholar

Scholl, T, Hediger M, Ances I. 1990. Maternal growth during pregnancy and decreased infant birth weight. Am J Clin Nutr 51:790-3.
View in Google Scholar

Scholl T, Hediger M, Schall J. 1997. Maternal growth and foetal growth: Pregnancy course and outcome in the Camden Study. Ann NY Acad Sci 817:292-301.
View in Google Scholar

Scholl T, Hediger M, Schall J, Khoo CS, Fischer R. 1994. Maternal growth during pregnancy and the competition for nutrients. Am J Clin Nutr 60:183-8.
View in Google Scholar

Shrim A, Ates S, Mallozi A, Brown R, Ponette V, Levin I, Shebata F, Almog B 2011. Is young maternal age really a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome in a Canadian tertiary referral hospital? J Pediatric Adolecent Gynecol 24:218-22.
View in Google Scholar

Snijders RJM, Nicolaides KH.1994. Foetal biometry at 14-40 week´s gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:34-48.
View in Google Scholar

Statistik Austria 2017. Statistical Yearbook 2017.
View in Google Scholar

Thame M, Osmond C, Bennett F, Wilks R, Forrester T. 2004. Foetal growth is directly related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:894-900.
View in Google Scholar

Torres J, Neves I, Yariwake V, Miglino M, Veras M. 2017. Advanced maternal age and placental morphofunctional changes: an experimental study in mice. Placenta 51:113.
View in Google Scholar

Virginia AR, Howard FA, Robin SG. 2001. The contribution of maternal age to racial disparities in birth weight. : A multilevel perspective. Am J Pub Health 91:1814-24.
View in Google Scholar

WHO 1980. Division of family planning. The incidence of low birth weight. A critical review of available information. World health Status Quart 33:197-224.
View in Google Scholar

WHO 1995. Physical status the use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO Technical Reports Series 854, Geneva.
View in Google Scholar

Yogev Y, Melamed N, Bardin R, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Ben-Shitrit G, Ben-Haroush A. 2010. Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:558e7.
View in Google Scholar

Zalud I, Shaha S.2008. Three-dimensional sonography of the placental and uterine spiral vasculature: Influence of maternal age and parity. J Clin Ultrasound 36:391-6.
View in Google Scholar