Facial attractiveness and lip morphology of Caucasian women

Zdzisław Lewandowski; Dariusz P. Danel

doi:10.2478/anre-2018-0035

Authors

Zdzisław Lewandowski Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University School of Physical Education in Wrocław, Poland
Dariusz P. Danel Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0035

Keywords:

lips, woman, attractiveness, averageness

Abstract

Human lips are one of the most sexually dimorphic facial features. Although lip morphology is considered particularly important for female facial attractiveness no systematic empirical study has been conducted in this respect. This study aimed to investigate a relationship between female Caucasian facial attractiveness and their lip morphology. Two series of morphologically average composite portraits with digitally increased and decreased lip width and height measurements were assessed by adult men and women. Results were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. When compared to the average lip shape both a decrease and an increase in lip width were associated with lower female facial attractiveness.

A systematic increase in lip height from the lowest values to the highest, was associated with an increase in attractiveness scores. Attractiveness assessments of men and women did not differ significantly. The results show that perception of lip attractiveness may be intersexually congruent and that a variation in lip morphology may significantly affect female facial attractiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alley TR, Cunningham MR. 1991. Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol Sci 2:123–5.

Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. 2004. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol 117:313–32.

Bisson M, Grobbelaar A. 2004. The esthetic properties of lips: A comparison of models and nonmodels. Angle Orthod 74:162–6.

Burriss RP, Little AC, Nelson EC. 2007. 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics. Arch Sex Behav 36:377–84.

Caisey L, Gubanova E, Camus C, Lapatina N, Smetnik V, Lévêque JL. 2008. Influence of age and hormone replacement therapy on the functional properties of the lips. Skin Res Technol 14:220–5.

Danel D. 2008. Stopień maskulinizacji twarzy męskich jako wskaźnik atrakcyjności w kontekście wybranych parametrów jakości partnera w ocenie kobiet. Ph. D. Thesis: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.

Danel D, Pawlowski B. 2007. Eye-mouth-eye angle as a good indicator of face masculinization, asymmetry, and attractiveness (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 121:221– 5.

Danel D, Pawłowski B. 2009. Biologiczne znaczenie atrakcyjności twarzy, in: B Pawłowski, editor. Biologia Atrakcyjności. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, pp. 166–205.

Farkas L. 1981. Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine. New York: Elsevier.

Field A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.).

Folstad I, Karter AJ. 1992. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603.

Frąckiewicz W. 2001. The aesthetics of the eyes and mouth position in three-point face schema. Anthropol Rev 64: 93–100.

Galton F. 1878. Composite portraits. Nature 18:97–100.

Giannoni E, Guignard L,Reymond MK, Perreau M, Roth-Kleiner M, Calandra T, Roger T. 2011. Estradiol and progesterone strongly inhibit the innate immune response of mononuclear cells in newborns. Infect Immun 79:2690–8.

Guéguen N. 2012. Does red lipstick really attract men? An evaluation in a bar. Int J Psychol Stud 4:206–209.

Guéguen N, Jacob C. 2012. Lipstick and tipping behavior: When red lipstick enhance waitresses tips. Int J Hosp Manag 31:1333– 5.

Hassebrauck M. 1998. The visual process method: A new method to study physical attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 19:111–23.

Jansson L, Holmdahl R. 1998. Estrogen-mediated immunosuppression in autoimmune diseases. Inflamm Res 47:290–301.

Jones D, Hill K. 1993. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum Nat 4:271–96.

Kanda N, Tsuchida T, Tamaki K. 1996. Testosterone inhibits immunoglobulin production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Exp Immunol 106:410–5.

Klein AW. 2005. In Search of the Perfect Lip: 2005. Dermatologic Surg. 31:1599–603.

Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. 2009. Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychol (Amst) 131:136–42.

Kościński K. 2008a. Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropol Rev 70:45–79.

Kościński K. 2008b. Facial attractiveness: Variation, adaptiveness and consequences of facial preferences. Anthropol Rev 71:77– 105.

Langlois JH, Roggman LA. 1990. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol Sci 1:115–21.

Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Musselman L. 1994. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychol Sci 5:214–20.

Lewandowski Z. 2011. Changes in selected features of a male face and assessment of their influence on facial recognition. Anthropol Anz 68:323–37.

Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM. 2011. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:1638–59.

Michiels G, Sather AH. 1994. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 9:95–103.

Penton-Voak I, Perrett D. 2000. Consistency and individual differences in facial attractiveness judgements: an evolutionary perspective. Soc Res (New York) 67:219–44.

Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, Henzi SP, Castles DL, Akamatsu S. 1998. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394:884–7.

Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. 1994. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368:239–42.

Peters M, Rhodes G, Simmons LW. 2007. Contributions of the face and body to overall attractiveness. Anim Behav 73:937–42.

Rhodes G. 2006. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 57:199– 226.

Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Clark A, Kieran L, McKay R, Akamatsu S. 2001. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30: 611–25.

Rowland DA, Perrett DI. 1995. Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 15:70–6.

Salem ML. 2004. Estrogen, a double-edged sword: modulation of TH1- and TH2-mediated inflammations by differential regulation of TH1/TH2 cytokine production. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 3:97– 104.

Samal A, Subramani V, Marx D. 2007. Analysis of sexual dimorphism in human face. J Vis Commun Image Represent 18:453–63.

Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, Dolci C, De Menezes M, Ferrario VF. 2010. Age- and sex-related changes in three-dimensional lip morphology. Forensic Sci Int. 200. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.050.

Tanner J. 1989. Foetus into man : physical growth from conception to maturity. Castlemead Publications, Ware.

Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 1999. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci 3:452–60.

Thornhill R, Grammer K. 1999. The body and face of woman: one ornament that signals quality? Evol Hum Behav 20:105–120.

Thornhill R, Møller AP. 1997. Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72:497–548.

Tiddeman B, Burt M, Perrett D. 2001. Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 21:42–50.

Verdonck A, Gaethofs M, Carels C, De Zegher F. 1999. Effect of low-dose testosterone treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty. Eur J Orthod 21:137–43.

Wedekind C, Folstad I. 1994. Adaptive or nonadaptive immunosuppression by sex hormones? Am Nat 143:936.

Yesilova Z, Ozata M, Kocar IH, Turan M, Pekel A, Sengul A, Ozdemír IC. 2000. The effects of gonadotropin treatment on the immunological features of male patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:66–70.

Zahavi A. 1977. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67:603–5.

Zahavi A. 1975. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–14.