Produktywność i mobilność kluczowych wynalazców: analiza porównawcza danych patentowych 12 państw Azji, Ameryki oraz Europy zachodniej
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-012-0030-xAbstrakt
Artykuł przedstawia nowe spojrzenie na rolę indywidualnych wynalazców w procesie tworzenia innowacji. Wynalazcy indywidualni stanowią element centralny procesu twórczego. Innowacja nie jest produktem firm i organizacji, wymaga indywidualnej kreatywności (Rothaermel i Hess 2007). Badanie koncentruje się na analizie płodnych wynalazców. Wynalazcy tej kategorii mają najwyższy udział w generowaniu ogółu wynalazków (Le Bas et al. 2010) o wysokiej wartości ekonkomicznej (Gambardella et al. 2005). Poprzednie badania kluczowych wynalazców skupiały się analizie firm, w których pracują lub w branżach, w których te firmy działają.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Breschi S. et al. (2010), The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: the role of inventors’mobility across firms and in space. in R. Boschma and R. Marton eds The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Edward Elgar Cheltenham UK
Google Scholar
Dodgson M. and D. Gann (2010), Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford. University Press. Oxford and. New York
Google Scholar
Ernst D. (2005), Pathways to innovation in Asia’s leading electronics exporting countries – a framework for exploring drivers and policy implications. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol 29. N°1-2, pp. 6-20
Google Scholar
Ernst H., Leptien C., Vitt J. (2000), Inventors are not alike: The Distribution of Patenting Output among Industrial R&D Personnel, in: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 184-199
Google Scholar
Fagerberg F. and Godinho (2006), Innovation and Catching up, in Fagerberg F., Mowery D.C., Richard R. Nelson R.R eds The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press; pp 514-542
Google Scholar
Felsenstein D. (2011), Human capital and labour mobility determinants of regional innovation. In COOKE (Philip), ASHEIM (Bjor ), BOSCHMA (Ron) et al. Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar
Google Scholar
Gambardella A., Harhoff D., Verspagen B. (2006), The value of Patents. Paper presented at the NBER Conference. The Economics of Intellectual Property. Cambridge (MA), July 19th
Google Scholar
Gay C. and Le Bas C. (2005), Uses without too much abuses of patents citations or the simple Economics of Patents Citations as a measure of the value and origin of codified Knowledge. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 14 (5), July, pp 333-338
Google Scholar
Gay C., Latham B., Le Bas C. (2008), Collective Knowledge, Prolific Inventors and the Value of Inventions: An Empirical Study of French, German and British Owned U.S. Patents, 1975-1998. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Volume 17, Jan. -March. pp 5- 22
Google Scholar
Hoisl K. (2007), Tracing mobile inventors-The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity, Research Policy, n° 36, pp. 619-636
Google Scholar
Hoisl K. (2009), Does Mobility Increase the Productivity of Inventors? Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2)
Google Scholar
Latham W., Le Bas C., R. Bouklia-Hassane, C. Le Bas C., D. Volodine (2011), Interregional mobility, productivity and the value of patents for prolific inventors in France, Germany and the U-K. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy. Vol. 7, N° 1/2/3. pp 92-113
Google Scholar
Latham W., Le Bas C., Volodin D. (2012), Value of invention, prolific inventor productivity and mobility: evidence from five countries, 1975-2002. Economies et Sociétés. Série W, N°14. pp 11-40
Google Scholar
Le Bas C., Cabagnols, A., Bouklia, R. (2010), Prolific Inventors: Who are They and Where do They Locate? Evidence from a Five Countries US Patenting Data Set. International Centre for Economic Research Working Paper No. 14/2010. Available at SSRN: hhtp://ssm.com/abstract=1625743
Google Scholar
Lundvall Bengt-Ake et al. (2009), Introduction. Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Ed. Lundvall, Joseph, Chaminade, Vang. Cheltenham. Northampton: Edward Elgar. 2009
Google Scholar
Narin F. and Breitzman A. (1995), Inventive productivity. Research Policy, 24, 507-519
Google Scholar
Pilkington A. et al. (2009), Defining key inventors: A comparison of fuel cell and nanotechnology industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (1), pp. 118-127
Google Scholar
Rothaermel F.T. and Hess A. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual, firm, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18 (6): 898-921
Google Scholar
Saxenian A. L. (2006), The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in the Global Economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Schankerman M., Shalem R., Trajtenberg M. (2006), Software Patents, Inventors and Mobility, Working Paper
Google Scholar
Trajtenberg M. (2004), The names game: Using Inventors Patent Data in Economic Research. Power-point Presentation. http://www.tau.ac.il/~manuel/
Google Scholar
Trajtenberg M., Shiff G., Melamed R. (2006). The "Names Game": Harnessing Inventors' Patent Data for Economic. Research. NBER working paper series, No. w12479, September
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.