The cognition of something in front and something in the background. Is “taken-for-granted reality” experienced?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2300-1690.19.16Słowa kluczowe:
cognitive sociology, ignoring, sociology of attention, Eviatar Zerubavel, existencial sociologyAbstrakt
The paper is an analysis of the cognitive-sociological model of reconstructing taken-for-granted knowledge, as presented by Eviatar Zerubavel. The analysis shows Zerubavel’s structuralist and “sociologistic” approach to common-sense knowledge. The analysis also shows that his concepts of formal sociology could be used in phenomenological, existentialist, and contemplative approaches, where social and cultural knowledge is bracketed and reflected upon to clear the social mind for personal and experiential cognition.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 373– 395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241605280449
Bentz, Valerie M., Rehorick, D., Marlatt, J., Nishii, A., & Estrada, C. (2018). Transformative Phenomenology as an Antidote to Technological Deathworlds. Schutzian Research, 10, 189–220. https://doi.org/10.5840/schutz20181011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/schutz20181011
Bentz, Valery M., & Giorgino, V. (2016). Contemplative Social Research: Caring for Self, Being, and Lifeworld. Santa Barbara: Fielding Institute Press.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brekhus, W. (1998). A Sociology of the Unmarked: Redirecting Our Focus. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00041
Brekhus, W. (2007). The Rutgers school: A Zerubavelian culturalist cognitive sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080705
Brekhus, W. (2015). Culture and cognition : patterns in the social construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press
Cary, M. S. (1978). Does civil inattention exist in pedestrian passing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1185
Denzin, N. K. (2006). Analytic Autoethnography, or Déjà Vu all Over Again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606286985
Denzin, N. K. (2009). On Understanding Emotion. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2001). The American Tradition in Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446263570
Douglas, J. D., & Johnson, J. M. (1977). Existential Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Durkheim, E. (2008). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199540129.001.0001
Giorgino, V. (2014). Contemplative Methods Meet Social Sciences: Back to Human Experience as It Is. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(4), 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12078
Giorgino, V. (2016). Contemplative Knowledge and Social Sciences: Close Encounters of the Enactive Kind. In Valery M. Bentz & V. Giorgino (Eds.), Contemplative Social Research. Caring for Self, Being, and Lifeworld (pp. 163–192). Santa Barbara: Fielding University Press
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine de Grutyer.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Johnson, J. M., & Melnikov, A. (2008). Existentialism and the Emergence, Growth, and Development of Existential Sociology. In Methodology, Theory, and Practice of the Sociological Analysis of a Modern Society: Collection of Scientific Papers (pp. 33–40). Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University Press
Kacperczyk, A. (2014). Autoetnografia – technika, metoda, nowy paradygmat? O metodologicznym statusie autoetnografii; Autoethnography – Technique, Method, or New Paradigm? On Methodological Status of Autoethnography. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, X(3), 32–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.10.3.03
Konecki, K. T. (2018). Advances in contemplative social research. Lodz, Krakow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego/Jagiellonian University Press.
Kotarba, J., & Fontana, A. (1987). The Existential Self in Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kotarba, J., & Johnson, J. M. (2002). Postmodern Existential Sociology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Manning, P. K. (1973). Existential Sociology. The Sociological Quarterly, 14(2), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1973.tb00854.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1973.tb00854.x
Melnikov, A. (2013). Research possibilities of valuenormative transformations of Ukrainian society from the perspective of existential sociology. Соціологія: Теорія, Методи, Маркетинг, (2), 52–70
Prus, R. (1996). Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research: Intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
Rehorick, D. A., & Bentz, V. M. (2008). Transformative phenomenology : changing ourselves, lifeworlds, and professional practice. New York: Lexington Books
Scheff, T. (1990). Microsociology: Discourse, Emotion, and Social Structure. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Scheff, T. (2014). Goffman on Emotions: The PrideShame System. Symbolic Interaction, 37(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.86 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.86
Schütz, A. (1945). On Multiple Realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533–576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2102818
Schütz, A. (1962). The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
van der Laan, E., & Velthuis, O. (2016). Inconspicuous dressing: A critique of the construction-throughconsumption paradigm in the sociology of clothing. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513505609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513505609
Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11–30. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/pandpr/article/view/19803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19803
Zerubavel, E. (1980). If Simmel Were A Fieldworker: On Formal Sociological Theory And Analytical Field Research. Symbolic Interaction, 3(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1980.3.2.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1980.3.2.25
Zerubavel, E. (1995). The Rigid, the Fuzzy, and the Flexible: Notes on the Mental Sculpting of Academic Identity. Social Research, 62(4), 1093– 1106. https://doi.org/10.2307/40971135
Zerubavel, E. (2015b). The Elephant in the Room: Silence and Denial in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Zerubavel, E. (2018a). Taken for granted: the remark - able power of the unremarkable. Oxfordshire : Princenton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/9781400889464
Zerubavel, E. (2018b). Terra Cognita. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351306003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351306003
Zuckerman, M., Miserandino, M., & Bernieri, F. (1983). Civil Inattention Exists—in Elevators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(4), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283094007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283094007
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
