Quest for the Alternative Spirituality: Construction of Religious Identity in Contemporary Lithuania

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-3180.07.08

Abstract

The transformation of religious area by arising of new modes of expressing religiosity is almost worldwide phenomena. The idea of making up personal bricolage of beliefs, choosing what fits and what does not is very popular mode of religiosity or spirituality today. To hear that one could choose religious identity without religious belief is not surprising in Lithuania today. Sociologically, it could be explained referring to the identity constructing theories. This article presents the research that was performed by the Department of Sociology at Vytautas Magnus University (in 2003-2004). The aim of the research was to explore the process of construction of religious identity via applying Hervieu-Leger idea of four dimensions of religious identification. The data of focused interviews confirms that religious identity could be constructed via one or few dimensions of religious identification excluding other dimensions. However, reference exclusively to one or few dimensions shifts traditional ( or confessional) ways of expressing religiousness and still for somebody rises the question about her/his religiousness in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beckford J. 2003. Social Movements as Religiuos Phenomena. In Sociology of Religion, Ed.R.K.Fenn. Blackwell Publishing, p.p. 229-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998571.ch12

Berger P. 1997. Epistemological modesty: An interview with Peter Berger. Christian Century 114:972-75,978.

Beyer P.1999. Secularization from the Perspective of Globalization: A Response to Dobbelaere. Sociology of Religion, 60:3, 289-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3711938

Dobbelaere K. Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Process Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization. Sociology of Religion, 60:3, 229- 247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3711935

Hadden J.K. 1987. Toward desacralizing Secularization Theory. Social Forces 65:587-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/65.3.587

Hervieu-Leger D. 1998. The Transmission and Formation of Socioreligious identities in Modernity. International Sociology, V.13, No.2, p.p. 213-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026858098013002005

Stark R. 1999. Secularisation R.I.P. Sociology of Religion, 60:3, 249-274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3711936

Swatos W.H., Christiano K.J. Secularization Theory: the Course of Concept. Sociology of Religion, 60:3, 209-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3711934

Ziliukaite R. 2000. Religiniu vertybiu kaita Lietuvoje 1990-1999. In Kulturologija, Ed. A. Matulionis. Gervele, p.p. 213-252.

Downloads

Published

2005-01-01

How to Cite

Kuznecoviene, Jolanta. 2005. “Quest for the Alternative Spirituality: Construction of Religious Identity in Contemporary Lithuania”. Space – Society – Economy, no. 7 (January): 81-89. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-3180.07.08.