A comparative analysis of EU coherence policy’s influence on the innovation and competitiveness of Central-Eastern European states in the years 2004–2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.321.03Keywords:
innovation, competitiveness, cohesion policy, Central-Eastern European country, European UnionAbstract
At the turn of the new millennium, building an economy based on knowledge became the EU’s main priority. Innovation, which was to be the key to the competitiveness of the EU economy, became an essential issue in the Lisbon Strategy. The determination to build an innovative system embracing local conditions was stronger during the first years of the present century. The states of Central-Eastern Europe, which had just undergone system transformations and were facing huge social and economic problems, were heading for integration with high hopes, believing that their presence on the uniform European market, especially the possibility to use coherence funds, would improve the innovation and competitiveness of their economies. The analysis included eleven states from among which eight joined the EU in the year 2004 – the Czech Republic, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary, two in the year 2007 – Bulgaria and Romania and one state in 2013 – Croatia. These states could expect significant European funds. Only in the years 2007–2013 the European Union assigned over 346,9 billion Euro for coherence policy. The amount of more than 175,5 billion Euro reached eleven states of Central-Eastern European states, which constituted well over a half of the full amount. The purpose of the elaboration is to compare and assess the extent to which the use of coherence policy funds contributed to the improvement of innovation and competitiveness of Central-Eastern European states. The fact that these states joined the EU at different times gives us an opportunity to observe the development of economies facing similar socio-economic problems within EU structures and at their outskirts.
Downloads
References
European Commission (2015), Innovation Union. Scoreboard 2015, Available on: http://ec.europa. eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards/files/ius-2015_en.pdf.
European Commission (2014), Innovation Union. Scoreboard 2014, Available on: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analysis/innovation-scoreboard/index_en.htm.
European Commission (2013), Innovation Union. Scoreboard 2013, Available on: http://ec.europa. eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analysis/innovation-scoreboard/index_en.htm.
European Commission (2012), Innovation Union. Scoreboard 2012, Available on: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analysis/innovation-scoreboard/index_en.htm.
European Commission (2012), Innovation Union. Scoreboard 2011, Available on: ((http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/e_i/subscription_en.htm).
European Union. Scoreboard 2010, (2011), European Commission, Brusels, Available on: www.proinno-europe.eu/metrics.
Eurostat (2013) Basic figures on the EU, Available on: (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/europe_2020_indicators/headline_indicators).
Eurostat (2013), Gross Domestic expenditure on R&D, 2002–2012 (% of GDP), Available on: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/File:Gross_domestic_expenditure_on_R%26D,_2002%E2%80%9312_%28%25_of_GDP%29_YB14.png.
Eurostat (2013) Science, technology and innovation in Europe, Luxembourg.
Eurostat (2012) Science, technology and innovation in Europe, Luxembourg.
GUS (2013) Działalność badawczo-rozwojowa w Polsce w 2013 roku, Warszawa.
GUS (2012) Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w latach 2008–2010, Warszawa.
GUS (2009) Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w latach 2006–2008, Notka informacyjna, Warszawa.
Kozioł-Nadolna K., (2011), Analiza działalności innowacyjnej przedsiębiorstw w Polsce w latach 2006–2008, Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania US, nr 21/2011, s. 71–81.
Krajewski S. (2014), Innovation Levels In The Economies Of Central And Eastern Europe, Comparative Economic Research, vol. 17, No. 3.
Łączak A. (2015), Fundusze unijne jako źródło finansowania innowacji w przedsiębiorstwach oraz efektywność ich wykorzystania w Polsce w latach 2004–2013, [w:] O nowy ład finansowy w Polsce. Rekomendacje dla animatorów życia gospodarczego. Seria „Przedsiębiorczość” pod red. J. Ostaszewski, SGH, Warszawa.
Łączak A. (2013), Finansowanie działalności przedsiębiorstw w Programie Operacyjnym Innowacyjna Gospodarki i jego znaczenie w dobie kryzysu, (w:) Studia Lubuskie 9/2013, s. 225–278. Piekut M. (2012), Innowacyjna działalność przedsiębiorstw w Polsce na tle Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkole Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie, t. 21, nr 2.
Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego (2011), Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka. Narodowe Strategiczne Ramy Odniesienia 2007–2013, Załącznik nr I do decyzji KE z dnia 1 października nr K (2007) 4562, Warszawa.
The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015 (2014), Schwab Klaus, Genewa.
Schwab K. (2013), The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014, (2013), ed. Schwab Klaus, Genewa.
Schwab K. (2012), The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013, (2012), ed. Schwab Klaus, Genewa.
Schwab K. (2011), The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012, (2011), ed. Schwab Klaus, Genewa.
Schwab K. (2010), The Global Competitiveness Report 2010–2011, (2010), ed. Schwab Klaus, Genewa.
Schwab K. (2009), The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010, (2009), ed. Schwab Klaus, Genewa.
Schwab K. (2008), The Global Competitiveness Report 2008–2009, (2008), Schwab Klaus, Genewa.
Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Rozwoju (2013), Sprawozdanie z realizacji w 2013 roku Narodowych strategicznych ram odniesienia na lata 2007–2013, Warszawa.
Ministerstwo Transportu, Budownictwa i Gospodarki Morskiej (2013), Strategia Rozwoju Transportu do 2020 roku (z perspektywą do 2030 roku), Warszawa.





