L’oeil-araignée. Descriptive systems like optical boxes in Diderot’s "Salons". A reading starting from Hamon’s theses

Authors

  • Giuseppe Crivella Université Paris-X Nanterre, Francia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2392-0718.08.03

Keywords:

Philippe Hamon, Visual Studies, description/definition, pantonyme, Diderot’s "Salons"

Abstract

The text aims to analyse how the descriptive systems work in the Salons of Diderot. Retrieving the dense network of operational definitions developed by Philippe Hamon in the well-known text Du descriptif, our study develops a series of analyses aimed at highlighting the distance of Diderot’s descriptive practice with respect to the theoretical statements of the rhetorical treatise before him or coeval, focusing above all on an absolutely original use of the pantonyme within the Salons.

References

ARASSE, D. (1973). L’image et son discours: deux descriptions de Diderot. Scolies : Cahiers de Recherches de l’ENS, 3-4, pp. 131-160.
Google Scholar

BACHELARD, G. (1943). L’air et les songes. Paris: José Corti.
Google Scholar

BARTHES, R. (2005). Leçon 1977, in Œuvres complètes V. Paris: Seuil.
Google Scholar

CARTWRIGHT, M. T. (1969). Diderot critique d’art et le problème de l’expression, Diderot Studies, 13, pp. 1-267.
Google Scholar

CHOUILLET, J. (1973). La formation des idées esthétiques de Diderot. Paris: Armand Colin.
Google Scholar

COHEN, H. (1991). Diderot et les limites de la littérature dans les Salons. Diderot Studies, 24, pp. 25-31.
Google Scholar

DE SAUSSURE, F. (1965). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Google Scholar

DIDEROT, D. (1995). Ruines et paysages. Salon de 1767. Paris: Hermann.
Google Scholar

DIDEROT, D. (2007). Essais sur la peinture. Salon de 1759, 1761, 1763. Paris: Hermann.
Google Scholar

DIDEROT, D. (2008). Salons. Paris: Gallimard.
Google Scholar

GENETTE, G. (1986). Figure III. Discorso del racconto. Torino: Einaudi.
Google Scholar

GRENAND, S. (2007). L’œil ravi. Violences du regard dans les premiers Salons de Diderot. Diderot Studies, 30, pp. 143-154.
Google Scholar

HAMON, P. (1981). Du descriptif. Paris: Hachette.
Google Scholar

IBRAHIM, A. (1995). Diderot et la question de la forme. Paris: PUF.
Google Scholar

LOJKINE, S. (2007). Le problème de la description dans les Salons de Diderot. Diderot Studies, 30, pp. 53-72.
Google Scholar

LYOTARD, J-F. (1985). La philosophie et la peinture à l’ère de leur expérimentation. In CAZENAVE, A & LYOTARD, J-F. (ed.), L’art des confins. Mélanges offerts à Maurice de Gandillac. Paris: PUF, pp. 465-477.
Google Scholar

ROGER, J. (1963). Diderot et Buffon en 1749. Diderot Studies, 4, pp. 221-236.
Google Scholar

SCHILLER, F. (1997). Sul Sublime, Milano: SE.
Google Scholar

SEGRE, C. (1999). Avviamento all’analisi del testo letterario. Torino: Einaudi.
Google Scholar

SERRES, M. (1974). La traduction. Hermès III. Paris: Minuit.
Google Scholar

SERRES, M. (1979). La distribution. Hermès IV. Paris: Minuit.
Google Scholar

SERRES, M. (1980). Le passage de Nord-Ouest. Hermès V. Paris: Minuit.
Google Scholar

Published

2020-11-03

How to Cite

Crivella, G. (2020). L’oeil-araignée. Descriptive systems like optical boxes in Diderot’s "Salons". A reading starting from Hamon’s theses. E-Scripta Romanica, 8, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.18778/2392-0718.08.03

Issue

Section

Articles