Jeszcze włócznia, czy już kopia? Rozważania w kontekście dzieł sztuki europejskiej

Autor

  • Artur Sierosławski Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN o/Warszawa; Państwowe Muzeum Archeologiczne w Warszawie image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.29.09

Słowa kluczowe:

bronioznawstwo, kopia, włócznia, kawaleria, średniowiecze

Abstrakt

The lance is an instantly recognizable medieval weapon. It’s the primary weapon of a medieval knights, the primary he uses in battle. But it’s still not clear when the lance appeared. In most publications its appearance is dated to the 12th c. There are no preserved artifacts and the written sources are not clear on this subject. New informations can be drawn from works of medieval art, especially illustrated manuscripts and architectural decorations. For this deliberation I used iconography dated between the 8th and 14th c. There are three characteristics with which we can distinguish the spear and the lance. The first is the construction of the shaft end. The difference between spear shaft and lance shaft is that the lance shaft had a vamplate, a small circular plate. In many publications it can be read, that this plate was made for protecting the hand. This is of course a misunderstanding. It allowed a firmer grip of the shaft upon impact. There was no need to protect the hand during the duel, because knights were trying to hit the head or the torso of their opponents, not the hand. The second way to recognize the kind of weapon is to analyse how the horsemen uses them. The spears were manipulated with one hand. Horsemen were very often attacking by rising the spear over the head and then striking their opponents from above. Lances were used in a quite different way. Horsemen during the attack had the lances under their arms and struck their enemies facing them. These two polearm techniques can be found on medieval representations. The third characteristic is the shape of the spearhead. In many illustrations it is shown very schematically, therefore very often we can’t identify the type of weapon basing on the presentation of the tip. The only exception is the spearhead of type VI (by Nadolski). The characteristic crosspiece attached to (or slightly below) the bush is quite often marked on the illustrations. In these situations we can be sure, that this weapon is a spear.

During the 8th–10th c. mounted units undoubtedly utilized spears, there is no argue about that. On every illustration made at that time which shows a mounted warrior armed with a pole weapon, this weapon is a spear. Around the middle of the 11th c. a very important change in the use of polearms occurred. The Bayeux Tapestry which was made around 1068 depicts horsemen using spears in a manner typical for the lance. One of knights represented in the battle scene holds his spear under his arm and hits his opponent in the face. This is an unquestionable evidence that the evolution of the lance started in the 11th, not the 12th c. Of course I don’t suggest, that the army of William the Conqueror was armed with lances, but that the mentioned work of early medieval art is the oldest evidence of the first step in the evolution of polearms. In this context we should look closer at some types of early medieval spearheads, especially of Nadolski’s type IX, which is relatively short, but massive. Could it be a type of an early lance head?

In the 12th and 13th c. the shaft of the lance was developed, the weapon became longer and heavier. Knights represented in art from that time always use their polearms by holding them under their arms. Hunting scenes are the only exceptions. In these cases the horsemen uses their weapons holding them I one hand, above their heads. That proves that they’re using spears. Another important source for this discussion is the Manesse Codex, which was written in the first half of the 14th c. A few illustrations depict duel scenes and “portraits” of knights, who were the main characters of poems contented in the Codex. Some of those illustrations are very accurate, with important details clearly visible. Some of the lances represented here have an additional constructional element, a vamplate. As it was written in the beginning, its presence is one of the essential differences separating the lance from the spear.

Is it possible to point the exact time when the lance appeared? Medieval iconography can bring us closer to the truth, but it only allows to identify the ante quem dating. Surely, the first step of the evolution of medieval polearms took place before 1066, before the battle of Hastings that is. But to say exactly how long before the battle took place mounted warriors had already been accustomed to the use of spears in a way specific for the lance – this cannot be determined.

Pobrania

Brak dostępnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

Andert R. 2005 Der fränkische Rieter, Dingsda-Verlag.
Google Scholar

Avril F., Barral i Altet X., Gaborit-Chopin D. 1983 Les Roqaumes d’Occident, Paris.
Google Scholar

Bayeux... bd. http://www.bayeuxtapestry.org.uk/Bayeux28.htm [2012-09-12].
Google Scholar

Binetti... bd. http://www.binetti.ru/bernardus/15.shtml [2012-09-12].
Google Scholar

Bogacki M. 2009 Broń wojsk polskich w okresie średniowiecza, Zakrzewo.
Google Scholar

Buchthal H. 1957 Miniature painting in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Buchthal H. 1971 Historia Troiana. Studies in the history of medieval secular illustration, London.
Google Scholar

Csapodi-Gárdonyi K. 1981 Iluminowane kodeksy europejskie, Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Davis P.K. 1999 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Dulinicz M. 2004 Lancea sacra – wędrówka idei i przedmiotów, [w:] Wędrówki rzeczy i idei w średniowieczu, red. S. Moździoch, Wrocław, s. 85–93.
Google Scholar

Folda J. 1976 Crusader Manuscript Illuination AT Saint-Jean d’Acre, 1275–1291, New Jersey.
Google Scholar

Gallica... n/d http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8426793j/f67.item [2012-09-12].
Google Scholar

Głosek M. 1990 Broń drzewcowa i obuchowa, [w:] Uzbrojenie w Polsce średniowiecznej 1350–1450, red. A. Nadolski, Łódź, s. 131 – 142.
Google Scholar

Hubert J., Porcher J., Volbach W.F. 1968 L’Empiere Carolingien, Paris.
Google Scholar

Nadolski A. 1954 Studia nas uzbrojeniem polskim w X, XI i XII wieku, „Acta Archaeologica Universitatis Lodziensis”, Nr 3, Łódź.
Google Scholar

Nadolski A. 1994 Polska technika wojskowa do 1500 roku, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Nowakowski A. 1980 Uzbrojenie wojsk krzyżackich w Prusach w XIV wieku i na początku XV wieku, Łódź.
Google Scholar

Nowakowski A. 1991 Uzbrojenie średniowieczne w Polsce (na tle środkowoeuropejskim), Toruń.
Google Scholar

Nowakowski A. 2005 Wojskowość w średniowiecznej Polsce, Malbork.
Google Scholar

Paulsen P. 1969 Flügellancen. Zum archäologischen Horizont der Wiener „sancta lancea”, „Frühmittelalterliche Studien”, Bd. 3, s. 299–312.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110242034.289

Romance... bd. <http://image.ox.ac.uk/show?collection=bodleian&manuscript=msbodl264 [2012-09-12].
Google Scholar

Szameit E. 1987 Karolingerzeitliche Waffenfunde aus Österreich. Teill II: die Saxe und Lanzenspitzen, „Archaeologia Austriaca”, Bd. 71, s. 155–171.
Google Scholar

Tapisserie... bd. http://www.tapisserie-bayeux.fr/index.php?id=395 [2012-09-12].
Google Scholar

Morgan... bd. http://www.themorgan.org/collections/swf/exhibOnline.asp?id=231 [2012-09-12].
Google Scholar

Walter I.F. 1988 Die Miniaturen der Großsen Heidelberger Liederhandschrift, Frankfurt am Mein.
Google Scholar

Żygulski Z. jun. 1975 Broń w dawnej Polsce na tle uzbrojenia Europy i Bliskiego Wschodu, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2012-01-01

Jak cytować

Sierosławski, A. (2012). Jeszcze włócznia, czy już kopia? Rozważania w kontekście dzieł sztuki europejskiej. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Archaeologica, (29), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.29.09

Numer

Dział

Articles