Socio-economic Status and Biological Characteristics of Students from Generation Z in France, Slovakia and Poland

Ewa Frąckiewicz; Ewa Rębacz-Maron; Rafał Czyżycki; Ghislaine Pellat; Jana Marasová

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.88.3.01

Authors

Ewa Frąckiewicz Institute of Management, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9009-9435
Ewa Rębacz-Maron Department of Ecology and Anthropology, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-2541
Rafał Czyżycki Institute of Spatial Management and Socio-Economic Geography, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-1887
Ghislaine Pellat Institut Universitaire de Technologie 2, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7678-9675
Jana Marasová Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9930-1345

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.88.3.01

Keywords:

SES, waist circumference, BMI, RFM, dynamometry, EU countries

Abstract

Generation Z, unlike any generation before them, lives in an era of rapid and global technological change, where most activities take place online. This lifestyle has significant implications for the well-being and health of internet users. The question is whether the contemporary socio-economic status (SES) and biological profile of Generation Z ‘immersed’ in new technologies is a universal phenomenon, independent of the country of residence. This study sets out to identify similarities and differences in the socio-economic and biological characteristics of Generation Z students from three European Union countries. Data were collected directly in France, Slovakia, and Poland. We used a survey questionnaire and non-invasive anthropometric measurements in Generation Z respondents (n=157). Our results show that there is a significant relationship between country of residence and three SES indicators: income, self-rated financial situation and time spent online, as well as three biological measures: body mass index (BMI), relative fat mass (RFM) and waist circumference (WC). Country of residence only partly explains the similarities and differences in the socio-economic status and biological characteristics of Generation Z students. In terms of SES, the participants’ profile is significantly influenced by financial situation, i.e. the student’s monthly disposable income and self-assessed financial situation, as well as time spent online. In turn, for biological factors, the significant measures are: BMI, RFM and WC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arseni N, Reitmayer HE, Pirjol DI. 2020. Relationship Between Smartphone Addiction and Physical Activity Among Students in Timisoara. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Universitaria Consortium FEFSTIM: Physical Education, Sports and Kinesiotherapy – Implications in Quality of Life. Page 350–355 Timisoara Romania.
View in Google Scholar

Ashwell M, Cole TJ, Dixon AK. 1996. Ratio of waist circumference to height is strong predictor of intra-abdominal fat. BMJ 313(7056): 559–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7056.559d
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7056.559d

Ashwell M, Gibson S. 2014. A proposal for a primary screening tool: ‘Keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’. BMC Med 12: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0207-1
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0207-1

Azhar M, Nadeem S, Naz F, Perveen F, Sameen A. 2014. Impact of parental education and socio-economic status on academic achievements of university students. Europ J Psychol Res 1(1).
View in Google Scholar

Bapat R, van Geel M, Vedder P. 2017. Socio-economic status, time spending, and sleep duration in Indian children and adolescents. J Child Fam Studies 26:80–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0557-8
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0557-8

Barron P, Leask A. 2017. Visitor engagement at museums: Generation Y and ʼLatesʼ events at the National Museum of Scotland. Mus Manag Curator 32(5):473–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2017.136725
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2017.1367259

Boutari C, Mantzoros CS. 2022. A 2022 update on the epidemiology of obesity and a call to action: as its twin COVID-19 pandemic appears to be receding, the obesity and dysmetabolism pandemic continues to rage on. Metabol 133:155217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155217
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155217

Brown P, Guy M, Broad J. 2005. Individual socio-economic status. community socio-economic status and stroke in New Zealand: A case control study. Soc Sci Med 61(6): 1174–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.003
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.003

Colhoun HM, Hemingway H, Poulter NR. 1998. Socio-economic status and blood pressure: an overview analysis. J Hum Hyper 12:91–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000558
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000558

Eurostat Everyday use of the Internet. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ISOC_CI_IFP_FU__custom_7984572/default/table?lang=en [Accessed 20 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

Eurostat on Internet use by people aged 16–24 years. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_ci_ifp_iu__custom_7964137/default/table?lang=en [Accessed 19 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

Eurostat, calculations on the percentage of people aged 15–24 years in 2019. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00010/default/table?lang=en [Accessed 19 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

Goh E, Lee C. 2018. A workforce to be reckoned with: The emerging pivotal Generation Z hospitality workforce. Int J Hospital Manag 73:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.016
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.016

Hemmerechtsa K, Agirdagb O, Kavadiasa D. 2017. The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Education Rev 69(1):85–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667

Huikari S, Junttila H, la-Mursula L, Jamsa T, Korpelainen R, Miettunen J, Korhonen M. 2021. Leisure-time physical activity is associated with socio-economic status beyond income – Cross-sectional survey of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. Econom Hum Biol 41:100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100969
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100969

Kall J. 2015. Branding na smartfonie. Komunikacja mobilna marki. Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa 2015, 236 (in Polish).
View in Google Scholar

Levickaite R. 2010. Generations H, Y, Z: How Social Networks Form the Concept of the World Without Borders (The Case of Lithuania). LIMES: Cult Regional 3(2):170– 83. https://doi.org/10.3846/limes.2010.17
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/limes.2010.17

Lin Y, Zhang Q, Chen W, Ling L. 2017. The social income inequality. social integration and health status of internal migrants in China. Int J Equit Health 16:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0640-9
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0640-9

Mannheim K. 1952. The Problem of Generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on The Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276– 322). Routledge.
View in Google Scholar

Martin R, Saller K. 1958. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in Systematischer Darstellung. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag Stuttgart.
View in Google Scholar

Mladkova L. 2017. Generation Z in the literature. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education (ERIE) 2017 (ERIE) Book Series Efficiency and Responsibility in Education. Prague. Czech Republic. 255–261.
View in Google Scholar

Rantanen T, Volpato S, Ferrucci L, Heikkinen E, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. 2003. Handgrip strength and cause-specific and total mortality in older disabled women: exploring the mechanism. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(5):636–41. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00207.x
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00207.x

Sahni S, Talwar A, Khanijo S, Talwar A. 2017. Socioeconomic status and its relationship to chronic respiratory disease. Adv Resp Med 85:97–108. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.2017.0016
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.2017.0016

Sainz M, Martinez R, Moya M, Rodriguez- Bailon R, Vaes J. 2021. Lacking socio- economic status reduces subjective well-being through perceptions of meta- dehumanization. British J Soc Psychol 60(2):470–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12412
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12412

Sasaki H, Kasagi F, Yamada M, Fujita S. 2007. Grip strength predicts cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and elderly persons. Am J Med 120(4):337–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.04.018
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.04.018

Stark O. 2023. On a tendency in health economics to dwell on income inequality and underestimate social stress. Econ Hum Biol. 49:101232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101232
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101232

Teddlie Ch, Yu F. 2017. Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J Mix Met 77: 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430

Turner A. 2015. Generation Z: technology and social interest. J Ind Psychol 71(2):103–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021

WHO. 2022. World Obesity Day 2022 – Accelerating action to stop obesity. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/04-03-2022-world-obesity-day-2022-accelerating-action-to-stop-obesity [Accessed 23 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

WHO. 2023a. Body mass index (BMI). Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index [Accessed 23 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

WHO. 2023b. A healthy lifestyle – WHO recommendations. Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations [Accessed 19 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

Woolcott OO, Bergman RN. 2018. Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole-body fat percentage – A cross-sectional study in American adult individuals. Sci Rep 8:10980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1

Woolcott OO, Seuring T. 2022. Prevalence trends in obesity defined by the Relative Fat Mass (RFM) index among adults in the United States: 1999-2018. Metab-Clin Experiment 128:S25-S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2021.155027
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2021.155027

World Economic Forum. 2023. Jak będzie wyglądał rynek pracy za kilka lat? Available at: https://coderslab.pl/pl/blog/jak-bedziewygladal-rynek-pracy-za-kilka-lat [Accessed 9 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

World Populations Prospects. 2022. Population Facts. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2015_factsheet1.pdf [Accessed 19 October 2023].
View in Google Scholar

Yadav GP, Rai J. 2017. The Generation Z and their social media usage: a review and a research outline. Glob J Entere Inf System 9(2):110–6. https://doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2017/15748
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/gjeis/2017/15748