Inheritance of Human Palmar Dermatoglyphs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.43.2.03Abstract
The author has investigated the main lines (DCBA) together with quantitative dermatoglyphic characters of the human palm on the material comprising palm prints of 168 families. The termination type of the main lines was shown to be heritable (see tables 3, 9, 10). The ridge count in three sub-digital areas: a-b, b-c, c-d, and along the line t-d on the palm is also found to be determined genetically (see respective tables 12 and 7).
Sexual dimorphism, as well as differences between the left and right palm, were visible in the ridge count in the case of those ridges that tend to be perpendicular to the longer axis of the hand (table 5). Numbers of ridges occurring in three sub-digital areas and along the t-d line are interrelated (table 8), though palmar ridge count is independent of the number of ridges on fingers.
Downloads
References
Basu A., Hum. Heredity, 1971, 21, 192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000152401
Baitsch H., Schwarzfischer C., Homo, 1959, 10, 226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.10.226
Claus G., Ebner H., Podstawy statystyki dla psychologów, pedagogów i socjologów, Warszawa 1972.
Cummins H., Midlo C., Finger prints, palms and soles, An introduction to dermatoglyphics, New York 1961.
Fang T. C., J. Hered., 1951, 42, 261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a106222
David T. J., Hum. Hered., 1971, 21, 624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000152456
Gładkowa T. D., Voprosy antropołogii, 1969, 31, 42.
Greń J., Statystyka matematyczna, modele i zadania, Warszawa 1974.
Gutekunst W., Przeg. Antrop., 1957, 23, 393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2954899
Jelisiejew T., Marcinkiewicz St., Folia Morph., 1972, 31, 241.
Kaczanowski K., Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Prace Zoologiczne, 1962, 7, 5.
Loesch D., Ann. Hum. Genet., 1971, 34, 277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1971.tb00240.x
Loesch D., Godlewska J., Folia Morph., 1971, 30, 511.
Loesch D., Czyżewska J., Folia Morph., 1972, 31, 249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0037677900117425
Marcinkiewicz D., Marcinkiewicz St., Gajewski Cz., Wilk A., Przegl. Antrop., 1972, 39, 61.
Marcinkiewicz St., Mat. Prac. Antrop., 1972, 83, 309.
Meyer-Cording G., Z. Morph. Antrop., 1955, 47, 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1955.tb16654.x
Meyer Heydenhagen G., Z. Morph. Anthrop., 1935, 33, 1.
Mitra A. K., Chattopadhyay P. K., Dashsharma P., Bardhan A., Humangenetik, 1966, 2, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00285906
Newman H. H., Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1939, 14, 331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-193909000-00010
Orczykowska-Świątkowska Z., Mat. Prac. Antrop., 1964, 65, 91.
Pons J., Ann. Hum. Genet., 1964, 27, 273.
Rogucka E., Szczotkowa S., Szczotka H., Mat. Prac. Antrop., 1971, 81, 159.
Rogucka E., Mat. Prac. Antrop., 1975, 86, 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197501000-00016
Shiono H., Kadowaki J., Hum. Biology, 1969, 41, 288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(64)80142-4
Sokołowska E., Acta Univ. Wratislaviensis, Prace Zoologiczne, 1974, 5, 137.
Urbanowicz M. D., Biuletyn Wojskowej Akademii Medycznej, Suplement I Zagadnienia Medycyny Klinicznej, 1971, 12, 1.
Zavala C., Cobo A., Lisker R., Hum. Hered., 1971, 21, 394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000152432
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
