The aesthetics of the eyes and mouth position in a three-point face schema

Authors

  • Waldemar Frąckiewicz Laboratory of Audiovisual Didactic Aids at the Faculty of Pedagogics and Psychology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Narutowicza 12, 20-004 Lublin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.64.07

Keywords:

face features, eye-mouth-eye angle, attractiveness, photograph, icon

Abstract

Oculographical research of people watching a human face indicates that beholder.s eyes stop most often and for the longest period of time on the eyes and the mouth of the face looked at and that they move among these three points most frequently. The position of the eyes and mouth in relation to one another can be described with a single number being a measure of an angle with the vertex in the middle of the mouth and with arms crossing the centers of the eye pupils. The angles were measured from photographs of people from all over the world, as well as of residents of Lublin. Subsequently, the subjects from Lublin were asked to make face schemas by positioning the eyes and the mouth in the way they considered most attractive. The eye-mouth-eye angle of these schemas was measured. Additionally, measurements of the same angle were taken from the faces depicted on icons. The schemas of the most attractive . according to the subjects . faces were characterized by angles approximating the mean angle from the photographs, and significantly greater than the mean angle from the icons.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALPATOV M.V., 1970, Sokrovisča russkogo iskusstva Xl - XVl viekov, Avrora, Leningrad

ANTONOVA V.I., 1966, Drevnerusskoe iskusstvo v sobranii Pavla Korina, Iskusstvo, Moskva

BULKIN V., 1982, Dionysius, Avrora, Leningrad

BREMSKE H., 1988, lkonen, Edition Atlantis, Zlirich

CARON A.J., R.F. CARON, R.C. CADWELL, S.J. WEISS, 1973, lnfant perception of structural properties of faces, Dev. Psychol., 9, 385-399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034910

COSS R.G., 1968, The ethological command in Art, Leonardo I. Pergamon Press, Great Britain, pp. 273-287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1571871

DAVIDOFF J., 1986, The mental representation of faces: Spatial and temporal factors, Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 391-400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208198

DERĘGOWSKI J.B., 1990, Oko i obraz, PWN, Warszawa

DRÓSCHER V.B., 1982, Reguła przetrwania, PWN, Warszawa

EIBL-EIBESFELDT I., 1986, Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens, Piper , Mlinchen

EIBL-EIBESFELDT I., 1987, Miłość i nienawiść, PWN, Warszawa

ETCOFF N., 2000, Przetrwają najpiękniejsi, Wyd. CiS & W.A.B., Warszawa

FRĄCKIEWICZ W., 1998, Atrakcyjność a rysy twarzy osoby spostrzegającej, Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 4, 288-298

FRĄCKIEWICZ W., 1999, Fizjologiczna estetyka, Wszechświat, 100, 87-89

FRĄCKIEWICZ W., 2000, Percepcja twarzy: schematy preferowane a rodzicielskie, Roczniki Psychologiczne, 3, 143-153

FRIDLUND A.J., 1994, Human facial expression, Academic Press, San Diego

GIBSON E.J., 1969, Principles of perceptual learning and development, Appleton Century Crafts, New York

HAIG N.D., 1986, lnvestigation face recognition with and image processing computer, [in:] Aspects of face processing, H.D. Ellis, M.A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe & A. Young (eds.), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4420-6_43

HIRUKAWA T., M. YAMAGUCHI 1996, Effect of sexual dimorphism on human facial attractiveness, ATR HIP Research Laboratories

HUCKSTEDT B., 1965, Experimentale Untersuchungen zum „Kindenschema", Zeitschrift flir Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 12, 421-450

KONNER M., 1982, The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit, Harper Colophon, New York

KOESLAG J.H., 1990, Koinophilia groups sexual creatures into species, promotes stasis, and stabilizes social behavior, J. Theor. Biol., 144, 15-35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80297-8

KENDRICK K.M., M.R. HINTON, K. ATKINS, 1998, Mothers determine sexual preferences, Nature, 395, 229-230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/26129

KORDYS J., 1991, Mózg i znaki, PIW, Warszawa

KUJAWA B., J. STRZAŁKO, 1998, Standard of physical attractiveness, Prz. Antropol. - Anthropol. Rev., 61, 31-48

LANGLOIS J.H., L.A. ROGGMAN, 1990, Attractive faces are only average, Psychol. Sci., 1, 115-121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x

LORENZ K., 1977, Odwrotna strona zwierciadła, PIW, Warszawa

PENTON-VOAK I.S., D.I. PERRETT, D.L. CASTLES, T. KOBOYASHI, D.M. BURT, L.K. MURRAY, R. MINAMISAWA, 1999, Menstrual cycle alters face preference, Nature, 399, 741-742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/21557

ROZANOVA N.V., 1970, Rostovo-Suzdalskaja iiwopis' Xll-XVll vekov, Izobrazitelnoe Iskusstvo, Moskva

SALKO N., 1978, Pamjatnik ovejannyj slavoj kulikowskoj bitvy, Avrora, Leningrad

STRZAŁKO J., K. KASZYCKA, 1990, Atrakcyjność fizyczna - obiektywne i subiektywne składowe oceny, Przegląd Antropologiczny, 54, 7-17

STRZAŁKO J., K.A. KASZYCKA, 1992, Physical attractiveness: lnterpersonal and intrapersonal variability of assessments, Social Biology, 39, 170-176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1992.9988813

SYMONS D., 1979, The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Oxford University Press, New York

VLEK C.A.J., L.H.C. VAN DER HEIJDEN, 1970, Aspects of suboptimality in multidimensional probabilistic information processing task, Acta Psychol., 34, 300-310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90025-9

VORONIN N.N., 1977, Smolenskaja iivopis' 12-13 vekov, Iskusstwo, Moskva

YARBUS A.L., 1965, Rol dviienija glaz w processe zrenija, Nauka, Moskva

ZUSNE L., 1970, Visual perception of form, Academic Press, New York DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197110000-00010

Downloads

Published

30-06-2001

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Frąckiewicz, Waldemar. 2001. “The Aesthetics of the Eyes and Mouth Position in a Three-Point Face Schema”. Anthropological Review 64 (June): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.64.07.