Predicting longevity from the line of life: is it accurate?

Authors

  • Teghan Lucas School of Medical Sciences, Anatomy, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Archaeology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  • Amrita Dhugga Biological Anthropology and Comparative Anatomy Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia
  • Maciej Henneberg Biological Anthropology and Comparative Anatomy Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia; Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2019-0011

Keywords:

dermatoglyphics, Cheiro, palmistry

Abstract

Palmistry or Chiromancy is the art of reading lines on the palm of the hands. Today, many researchers believe that the lines on the palms of the hands can predict the individual’s future. Computer programs are being designed which can automatically read the lines on the palm of the hand. One popular theory is that the length of the line of life will indicate lifespan. This theory was investigated in 1974 by Wilson and Mather who found no significant correlation between life expectancy and the length of the line of life. In 1990 Newrick and colleagues found a significant correlation as measured on 100 cadavers. These conflicting investigations are the only existing studies which have explored the relationship between palmistry and longevity. Since then no other study has validated nor disproven these claims. A total of 60 cadavers donated to The University of Adelaide were used in this study. Total hand length and the line of life length were measured on all cadavers. The age at and cause of death were also recorded. Linear regressions were used to establish any correlations between longevity and the length of the line of life. No significant correlations were found. There was also no significant difference between males and females or the right or left hands. As no significant correlations were found between longevity and the line of life all efforts at producing more reliable and automatic ways to read the lines are futile. This study puts to rest any debate surrounding the use of the line of life in palmistry as introduced by Newrick and colleagues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheiro, 1988. Cheiro’s palmistry for all: the classic of palmistry: a practical work on the study of the lines of the hand. New York: Prentice Hall Press.

Cheiro, Owen L. 1977. You and Your Hand. London: Sphere.

Desai D, Parekh M, Shah D, Sawant D, Nagare A. 2015. Automated medical palmistry system based on image processing techniques. IJARCSSE 5:725–29.

Hamon L. 1900. Cheiro’s Language of the hand. London: Nichols & Company.

Hamon L. 1975. Cheiro’s Guide to the Hand. London: Corgi Books.

Hodges G. 1995. Lifeline on your palm really does tell how long you’ll live. Weekly World News. Oct 24:6.

Jones FW. 1942. The principles of anatomy as seen in the hand. ed 2. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins co.

Mardia KV. 1990. On longevity and life-line. J Appl Stat 17:443–448.

Navpat A, Mukherjee R, Pandita V, Gupta S. 2012. Application of prediction software in palmistry. MGPI National Multi Conference 7–8th April.

Newrick PG, Affie E, Corrall RJ. 1990. Relationship between longevity and lifeline: a manual study of 100 patients. J R Soc Med 83:499–501.

Pandit H, Shah DM. 2011. Application of digital image based processing and analysis in healthcare based medical palmistry. International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Data Processing.

Penrose LS. 1973. Fingerprints and palmistry. The Lancet 301:1239–42.

Sharma MJ, Jhawar P, Sharma H, Sharma S, Kalavatia I. 2012. Dermatoglyphics an attempt to predict downs syndrome. IJBMR 3:1631–35.

Shiono H. 1986. Dermatoglyphics in medicine. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 7:120.

Wilson ME, Mather LE. 1974. Life expectancy. JAMA 229:1421–1422.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2019

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lucas, Teghan, Amrita Dhugga, and Maciej Henneberg. 2019. “Predicting Longevity from the Line of Life: Is It Accurate?”. Anthropological Review 82 (2): 155-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2019-0011.