The Coase theorem and idea of transaction costs – their significance for the development of economics

Authors

  • Janina Godłów-Legiędź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-009-0022-7

Abstract

Ronald Coase drew the attention of main stream economists to the significance of social coordination in the economic system. The key role was played here by much-disputed political conclusions drawn from Coase’s idea as well as by his famous theorem and the zero transaction costs theory. The study focuses on the division of labor as a starting point for analysis of zero transaction costs. From this vantage point, the best example of the world of zero transaction costs is Robinson Crusoe’s island. However, very often the concept of zero transaction costs is associated with the assumption of perfect information. If we stretch this assumption to its logical limits, then there is no market mechanism and all impediments related to the central planning system disappear. This interpretation is in line with the Hayekian interpretation of the market as a mechanism for acquiring knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen D. W. (2000), Transaction Costs, [in:] Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume I. The History and Methodology of Law and Economics , Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
Google Scholar

Butler M., Garnett R. (2003), Teaching the Coase Theorem: Are We getting It Right?, ‘Atlantic Economic Journal’ , no. 2
Google Scholar

Coase R. (1937), The Nature of Firm, ‘Economica’ 1937, no. 4
Google Scholar

Coase R. (1959), The Federal Communications Commission, ‘The Journal of Law and Economics’, vol. 2
Google Scholar

Coase R. (1960), Problem of Social Cost, „Journal of Law and Economics”, Volume 3
Google Scholar

Coase R. (1990), The Firm, the Market and the Law, The University Chicago Press, Chicago and London
Google Scholar

Coase R. (1992), The Institutional Structure of Production, ‘The American Economic Review’, no. 4
Google Scholar

Coase (1997), Nobel laureate Ronald Coase on rights, resources, and regulation, R. Coase interviewed by T. Hazzlett, ‘Reason Magazine’, http://www.reason.com/news/show/30115.html (Accessed February 14, 2008)
Google Scholar

Dollery B. (2001), New Institutional Economics and the Analysis of the Public Sector, ‘Policy Studies Review’, no. 1
Google Scholar

Furubotn E. G., Richter R. (2000), Institutions and Economic Theory. The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Google Scholar

Hsiung B. (1999), Sailing Towards the Brave New World of Zero Transaction Costs, ‘European Journal of Law and Economics’, no. 8
Google Scholar

Lives of the Laureates. Thirteen Nobel Economists, (2002) red. W. Breit, R. W. Spencer, MIT Press, Cambridge-London
Google Scholar

Medema S. (1996), Coase, Costs, and Coordination, ‘Journal of Economic Issues’, no. 2
Google Scholar

North C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar

Schlafly A. (2007), The Coase Theorem: The Greatest Economic Insight of the 20th Century, ‘Journal of American Physician and Surgeons’, no. 2
Google Scholar

Wang N. (2003), Measuring Transaction Costs: An Incomplete Survey, Ronald Coase Institute, p. 4, http://www.coase.org/workingpapers/wp-2.pdf (Accessed April 20, 2009)
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2010-06-07

How to Cite

Godłów-Legiędź, J. (2010). The Coase theorem and idea of transaction costs – their significance for the development of economics. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 12(4), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-009-0022-7

Issue

Section

Articles