Economic Inequalities And The Level of Decentralization In European Countries: Cluster Analysis

Šárka Labutková; Pavla Bednářová; Vladimíra Hovorková Valentová

doi:10.1515/cer-2016-0028

Authors

Šárka Labutková Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, Department of Economics
Pavla Bednářová
Vladimíra Hovorková Valentová Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, Department of Economic Statistics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0028

Keywords:

cluster analysis, decentralization, economic development, human development, inequality, regional disparities

Abstract

This submitted article identifies relations between the degree of decentralization and economic imbalances on the basis of a cluster (exploratory) analysis. Two indicators have been chosen for measuring economic inequalities: an indicator of dispersion of regional GDP per capita as representative of the performance imbalances within countries (it measures the economic development gap among regions in European countries); and a multidimensional inequality-adjusted human development index as representative of inequalities in the distribution of wealth in the countries. Decentralization is measured by means of a decentralization index, which contains both quantitative and qualitative components. Although groups of countries characterised by a high degree of decentralization do not necessarily show the lowest degrees of economic imbalances, it is however possible to conclude that the countries in groups with a higher degree of decentralization are among those countries with more favourable values of the economic imbalances indicators monitored. As a part of the research, two clusters of countries were identified which are identical in their degree of decentralization, but differ in the results connected with economic imbalances. The differences are caused by different institutional qualities in the two groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AER (2009), From Subsidiarity to Success: The Impact of Decentralization on Economic Growth, 'Assembly of European Regions'.
Google Scholar

Amable B. (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Bednářová P., Laboutková Š. (2014), Decentralization as a Factor Influencing Economic Imbalances in the European Countries, 'Ekonomický časopis/ Journal of Economics', no. 62.
Google Scholar

Bodman P., Hodge A. (2010), What Drives Fiscal Decentralization? Further Assessing the Role of Income, 'Fiscal Studies', no. 31.
Google Scholar

EBRD (2007), Life in Transition Survey I, 'European Bank for Reconstruction and Development', London.
Google Scholar

EC (2011, 2012, 2013), Eurostat Regional Yearbook, [online] http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Europe_in_figures_Eurostat_yearbook (Cited from 25 Apr 2014).
Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Google Scholar

Eurostat (2010, 2011), SILC, [online] http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tessi190. (Cited from 9 May 2014).
Google Scholar

Eurostat (2013), GDP at regional level, [online] http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/GDP_at_regional_level. (Cited from 20 Apr 2014).
Google Scholar

Ezcurra R., Pascual P. (2007), Spatial Disparities in Productivity in Central and Eastern Europe, 'Eastern European Economics', no. 45.
Google Scholar

Falco E. (2014), Income inequality: nearly 40 per cent of total income goes to people belonging to highest (fifth) quintile, 'Statistics in Focus', no. 12, [online] http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Income_inequality_statistics. (Cited from 22 Jun 2015).
Google Scholar

Fujita M., Thisse J.F. (2002), Economics of Agglomeration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Gil Canaleta C., Pascual P., Rapun M. (2004), Regional Economic Disparities and Decentralisation, 'Urban Studies', no. 41.
Google Scholar

Huther J., Shah A. (2005), A Simple Measure of Good Governance, [in:] A. Shah (ed.) Public Services Delivery, World Bank, Washington, D. C.
Google Scholar

Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. (2010), The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. 'World Bank Policy Research Working Paper', no. 5430.
Google Scholar

Kotsogiannis C., Schwager R. (2005), On the Incentives to Experiment in Federations, 'Cesifo Working Paper', no. 1585, [online] http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/suche.html. (Cited from 10 Oct 2015).
Google Scholar

Krugman P. (1998), What’s New about the New Economic Geography?, 'Oxford Review of Economic Policy', no. 14.
Google Scholar

Laboutková Š. (2009), The Establishment of NGOs as One Growing Part of Developing Interest Groups in the Czech Republic, 'E + M Ekonomie a Management/Economics and Management', no. 12.
Google Scholar

Laboutková Š. (2012), Posilování principu subsidiarity jako jeden z faktorů růstu vlivu regionů v rozhodovacích procesech Evropské Unie [Enforcing the Principles of Subsidiarity by Boosting Local and Regional Authorities Involvement in the EU Decision-making Process.], 'Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics', no. 60.
Google Scholar

Letelier L. (2005), Explaining Fiscal Decentralization, 'Public Finance Review', no. 33.
Google Scholar

Milanovic B. (2002), Can we Discern the Effect of Globalization on Income Distribution? Evidence from Household Budget Surveys, 'World Bank Economic Review', no. 19.
Google Scholar

Murthi M., Tiongson E. (2008), Attitudes to Equality: The “Socialist Legacy” Revisited, 'Policy Research Working Paper', World Bank, Washington D. C., no. 4529.
Google Scholar

Panizza U. (1999), On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence, 'Journal of Public Economics', no. 74.
Google Scholar

Petrakos G. (2001), Patterns of Regional Inequality in Transition Economies, 'European Planning Studies', no. 9.
Google Scholar

Prud´homme R. (1994), On the Dangers of Decentralization, 'Policy Research Working Paper', The World Bank, Washington D. C., no. 1252.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Pose A., Ezcurra R. (2009), Does Decentralization Matter for Regional Disparities? A Cross-country Analysis, 'SERC Discussion Paper', no. 25.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Pose A., Gill N. (2006), How Does Trade Affect Regional Disparities?, 'World Development', no. 34.
Google Scholar

Řezanková H., Húsek D., Snášel V. (2007), Shluková analýza dat, Professional Publishing, Praha
Google Scholar

Sen A.K. (1973), On Economic Inequality, W. W. Norton, New York.
Google Scholar

Sepulveda C.F., Martinez-Vazquez J. (2011), The Consequences of Fiscal Decentralization on Poverty and Income Equality, 'Environment and Planning. Government and Policy', no. 29.
Google Scholar

Sharma C.K. (2009), Emerging Dimensions of Decentralization Debate in the Age of Globa-lisation, 'Journal of Federal Studies', no. 19.
Google Scholar

Sojka M., Konečný B. (1996), Malá encyklopedie moderní ekonomie, Libri, Praha.
Google Scholar

Stankovičová I., Vojtková M. (2007), Viacrozmerné štatistické metódy s aplikáciami, Iura Edition, Bratislava.
Google Scholar

UNDP United Nations Development Programme (2011, 2012, 2013), Human Development Report, [online] http://hdr.undp.org/en. (Cited from 16 Sep 2015).
Google Scholar

WB (2000), Making Transition Work for Everyone: Poverty and Inequality in Europe and Central Asia, The World Bank, Washington D. C.
Google Scholar

WB (2010), Worldwide Governance Indicators, The World Bank, [online] http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home. (Cited from 18 Sep 2015).
Google Scholar

Williamson J.G. (1965), Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of Patterns, 'Economic Development and Cultural Change', no. 13.
Google Scholar

Zaidi S. (2009), Main Drivers of Income Inequality in Central European and Baltic Countries, 'Policy Research Working Paper', World Bank, Washington D. C., no. 4815.
Google Scholar