Rationality as the condition of individual rights in David Gauthier’s "Morals by Agreement"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.38.06Keywords:
Rationality, utility, rights, Gauthier, choiceAbstract
The topic of this paper is the foundation for individual rights proposed by David Gauthier in his seminal 1986 book Morals by Agreement, and particularly the role of conception of rationality in this foundation. The foundation of rights is a part of Gauthier’s broader enterprise: to ground morals in rationality – more specifically, in the economic conception of rationality. Because of the importance of this conception for the whole of Gauthier’s project, we reconstruct first the conception of rationality which can be found in decision theory and game theory, presenting simultaneously in a relatively non-technical way some basic concepts of the aforementioned disciplines. We proceed then to reconstruction of the foundation of rights itself – it turns on Gauthier’s interpretation of the so-called “Lockean proviso.” Lastly, we turn to the connection between rationality and foundation of rights. It is to be found in the narrow compliance – the disposition to enter only into cooperation which satisfies conditions of fairness set out in part by the Lockean proviso.
References
Baier, K. (1988). Rationality, Value, and Preference. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5 (2), pp. 17–45 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000042
Buchanan, J. M. (1988). The Gauthier Enterprise. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5, (2), pp. 75–94 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000078
Fishkin, J. S. (1988). Bargaining, Justice, and Justification: Towards Reconstruction. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5 (2), pp. 46–64 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000054
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198249926.001.0001
Hardin, R. (1988). Bargaining for Justice. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5 (2), pp. 65–74 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000066
Harman, G. (1988). Rationality in Agreement. A Commentary on Gauthier’s ‘Morals by Agreement’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5 (2), pp. 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000030
Locke, J. (1988). The Second Treatise of Government. In his Two Treatises of Government. Edited by P. Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810268
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions. Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
McClennen, E. F. (1988). Constrained Maximization and Resolute Choice. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5, 2, pp. 95–118 https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505250000008X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505250000008X
Morris, C. W. (1988). The Relation between Self-Interest and Justice in Contractarian Ethics. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5 (2), pp. 119–153 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000091
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Cambridge: Basic Books.
Straffin, P. (1993). Game Theory and Strategy. Washington: The Mathematical Association of America, 1993.
Thomas, L. (1988). Rationality and Affectivity: The Metaphysics of the Moral Self. Social Philosophy and Policy, 5 (2), pp. 154–172 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000108
Vallentyne, P. (1991). Contractarianism and the assumption of mutual unconcern. In Vallentyne P. (ed.), Contractarianism and Rational Choice. Essays on David Gauthier’s ‘Morals by Agreement’. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 71–75.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
