Phenomenological “Principle of Principles” As a Departure from Kant’s Concept of a Strictly Discursive Character of Intellect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.23.10

Abstract

Within the content of the following paper I aim to reveal some epistemological benefits, related to Husserl's concept of an eidetic intuition. In order to do so, I refer to Kant's radical division of the subject's cognitive activity into two main epistemic faculties, namely intuition, which – according to Kant's statements – may be just empirical, and being strictly and only discursive intellect. Having presented it I further proceed to describe certain difficulties, being the result of the rejection of possibility of an intuitive use of intellect, such as the objective validity of cognizing an apriorical forms, or the process of creating an empirical notions. Finally I refer to Husserl's acceptation of an eidetic intuition, being – according to my opinion – the only way of solving all the problems presented above.

References

Descartes,R. 2001, Medytacje o pierwszej filozofii, (tł. M. i K. Ajdukiewiczowie, S. Świeżawski i I. Dąbska). Kęty.

Husserl, E. 1967, Idee czystej fenomenologii i fenomenologicznej filozofii, t. I, (tł. D. Gierulanka). Warszawa.

Husserl, E. 2000, Badania logiczne, t. II, cz. 1, (tł. J. Sidorek). Warszawa.

Kant, I. 1999, Marzenia jasnowidzącego objaśnione przez marzenia metafizyki, (tł. W. M. Kozłowski). W: I. Kant, Pisma przedkrytyczne. Toruń.

Kant, I. 2001, Krytyka czystego rozumu, (tł. R. Ingarden), Kęty.

Kant, I. 2005, Logika. Podręcznik do wykładów, (tł. A. Banaszkiewicz). Gdańsk.

Rosiak, M. 1995, Ontologia ufundowania. Ogólna teoria części i całość w „Badaniach logicznych” Edmunda Husserla. W; „Filozofia Nauki”, nr 1-2.

Sidorek, J. 2006, Słowo wstępne. W: E. Husserl, Badania logiczne, t. I, (tł. J. Sidorek). Warszawa.

Downloads

Published

2010-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jeziorski, Marcin. 2010. “Phenomenological ‘Principle of Principles’ As a Departure from Kant’s Concept of a Strictly Discursive Character of Intellect”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, no. 23 (January): 163-71. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.23.10.