Jürgen Habermas' Ethics of the Species as a Proposal for Regulating Biotechnological Progress

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.42.03

Keywords:

Habermas, liberal eugenics, ethics of the species, self-understanding of the species, universalistic morality, postmetaphysical thinking

Abstract

Jürgen Habermas argues that under conditions of liberal eugenics, the self-understanding of the species may change. Therefore, it is necessary to establish regulations that would control the development of new biotechnological methods. This must be done in order to preserve the basis of universalistic morality, which allows individuals to regulate their conflicts in a fair manner. According to Habermas, the self-understanding of the species we had until now assumes that individuals understand themselves as autonomous and equal. Such self-understanding is not possible when one individual determines the genetic characteristics of another. Jürgen Habermas proposes to regulate the development of biotechnology according to the ethics of the species, which is a reconstruction of the conditions of self-understanding we already have. The ethics of the species assumes that individuals should understand that their genetic traits have been formed naturally. Nevertheless, the ethics of the species does not prejudge the use of genetic manipulations for therapeutic purposes, for which, according to Habermas, the permission of future individuals can be assumed without affecting their self-understanding.

References

Agar, N. (1998). Liberal Eugenics. North American Philosophical Publications, 12 (2), s. 137–155.

Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification. W: Habermas, J., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge–Maldon: The MIT Press, s. 43–115.

Habermas, J. (1992). Themes in Postmetaphysical Thinking. W: Habermas, J., Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge–London, The MIT Press, s. 28–53.

Habermas, J. (1993). On the Pragmatic, the Ethical, and the Moral Employments of Practical Reason. W: Habermas, J., Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge–London: The MIT Press, s. 1–17.

Habermas, J. (2001). Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik?. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Habermas, J. (2003). Przyszłość natury ludzkiej. Czy zmierzamy do eugeniki liberalnej?. Tłum. Małgorzata Łukasiewicz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.

Habermas, J. (2021). Once again: On the relationship between morality and ethical life. European Journal of Philosophy, 29 (3), s. 543–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12716

Harris, J. (2021). Poprawianie ewolucji. Argumenty etyczne za tworzeniem lepszych ludzi. Tłum. T. Sieczkowski. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-228-1

Kant, I. (1995). O porzekadle: To może być słuszne w teorii, ale nic nie jest warte w praktyce; Do wiecznego pokoju: projekt filozoficzny. Tłum. Mirosław Żelazny. Toruń: Wydawnictwo COMER.

Kędziora, K. (2022). Powściągliwość myślenia. W: Gensler, M., Gralińska-Toborek, A., Kazimierska-Jerzyk, W., Kędziora, K. (red.), Practica et Speculativa, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, s. 141–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-570-1.08

Spaemann, R. (2022). To, co naturalne. Eseje antropologiczne. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Żuradzki, T. (2014). Nowa liberalna eugenika: krytyczny przegląd argumentów przeciwko biomedycznemu poprawianiu ludzkiej kondycji fizycznej lub umysłowej. Diametros, 42, s. 204–226.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-21 — Updated on 2023-12-04

Versions

How to Cite

Dubchak, Olena. (2023) 2023. “Jürgen Habermas’ Ethics of the Species As a Proposal for Regulating Biotechnological Progress”. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, no. 42 (December): 97-113. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.42.03.