Inhabiting Other Bodies – Animal Characters and Avatars

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.10.04

Keywords:

animal studies, phenomenology, animal games, avatar, PC, game studies, embodiment

Abstract

This article explores the significance of phenomenological perspectives for animal games, as defined by Gunnar Eggertsson, in which the player’s character is meant to signal an animal. Using examples from games like Stray, Shelter 2, and Endling – Extinction is Forever, which treat animals as fully-fledged protagonists, I demonstrate how animal characters and avatars affect the gaming experience and broader human-animal relations outside of gameplay. The goal of this inquiry is to understand whether games can bring us closer to a better understanding of the animal Other by simulating its experiences and perspectives. This study utilizes the perspectives of critical animal studies and phenomenological philosophy to provide a deeper description and understanding of human players’ interactions with animal characters. It emphasizes the role of embodiment in shaping a transformative gameplay experience.

Author Biography

  • Emilia Mazur

    Emilia Mazur jest studentką Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, kończącą studia magisterskie na kierunku Artes Liberales, z dyplomem Antropozoologa. Zajmuje się eksploracją interdyscyplinarnych aspektów Animal i Game Studies, a także tematyką reprezentacji i statusu grup mniejszościowych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem zwierząt nieludzkich. Poprzez swoje zaangażowanie we wzmacnianie marginalizowanych głosów, stara się przyczynić do powstawania bardziej współodczuwającego i sprawiedliwego świata dla wszystkich istot.

References

Amorim, M.-A. (2003). „What is my avatar seeing?”: The coordination of „out-of-body” and „embodied” perspectives for scene recognition across views. Visual Cognition, 10(2), 157–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713756678

Banks, J., Bowman, N.D. (2016). Avatars are (sometimes) people too: Linguistic indicators of parasocial and social ties in player–avatar relationships. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554898

Bassey, V. (3 listopada 2015). Shelter 2 – A Post Mortem. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/shelter-2-a-post-mortem (data dostępu: 7 października 2024).

Berger, J. (1980). About looking; Why look at animals? Nowy Jork: Pantheon Books.

Burt, J. (2005). John Berger’s „Why Look at Animals?”: A Close Reading. World-views: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 9(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568535054615321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568535054615321

Cerezo-Pizarro, M., Revuelta-Domínguez, F.-I., Guerra-Antequera, J., Melo-Sánchez, J. (2023). The Cultural Impact of Video Games: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111116

Chang, A.Y. (2019). Playing nature: Ecology in video games. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctvthhd94

Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2008). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Nowy Jork: HarperCollins.

De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., Gallagher, S. (2010). Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009

Debarba, H.G., Molla, E., Herbelin, B., Boulic, R. (2015). Characterizing embodied interaction in First and Third Person Perspective viewpoints. 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2015.7131728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2015.7131728

Downs, E., Bowman, N.D., Banks, J. (2019). A polythetic model of player-avatar identification: Synthesizing multiple mechanisms. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000170

Eggertsson, G.T. (2022). Life as a Lynx: A Digital Animal Story. W: A. Björck, C. Lindén, A.-S. Lönngren (red.), Squirrelling Human–Animal Studies in the Northern-European Region (s. 197–216). Stockholm: Södertörn University.

Gee, J.P. (2008). Video Games and Embodiment. Games and Culture, 3(3–4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412008317309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412008317309

Han, B.-C. (2024). Kryzys narracji i inne eseje (tłum. R. Pokrywka). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/staying-with-the-trouble DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q

Kamińska, M. (2011). Niecne memy: Dwanaście wykładów o kulturze internetu. Poznań: Galeria Miejska „Arsenał”.

Kearney, R. (1988). The Wake of Imagination: Toward a Postmodern Culture (1st edition). Nowy Jork–Londyn: Routledge.

Kearney, R. (2020). Philosophies of Touch: From Aristotle to Phenomenology. Research in Phenomenology, 50(3), 300–316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27117412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341453

Klevjer, R. (2012). Enter the Avatar: The Phenomenology of Prosthetic Telepresence in Computer Games. W: J. Sageng, H. Fossheim, T. Mandt Larsen. (red.) The Philosophy of Computer Games. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology (t. 7, s. 17–38). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4249-9_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4249-9_3

Kłosiński, M. (2023). Przygody cyfrowego tułacza: Interpretacje groznawcze. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31261/PN.4147

Leonek, D. (2019). Endling. Diana Lelonek. http://dianalelonek.com/portfolio/563/

„Like using the Force”: Neuralink patient demonstrates how he plays chess using brain-chip – video. (21 marca 2024). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/video/2024/mar/21/neuralink-patient-plays-chess-using-brain-chip-video (data dostępu: 7 października 2024).

Małecki, W., Pawłowski, B., Sorokowski, P. (2016). Literary Fiction Influences Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168695

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception: An introduction. Nowy Jork– Londyn: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610

Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914

Pick, A. (12 czerwca 2015). Necsus | Why not look at animals? https://necsus-ejms.org/why-not-look-at-animals/ (data dostępu: 7 października 2024).

Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of Being: Phenomenology, psychiatry and the sense of reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199206469.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199206469.001.0001

Tyler, T. (2022). GAME. Animals, Video Games and Humanity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Tymińska, M. (2016). Avatars Going Mainstream: Typology of Tropes in Avatar-Based Storytelling Practices. Replay. The Polish Journal of Game Studies, 3(1), 101–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.03.06

Uexküll, J. von. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With A theory of meaning (tłum. J.D. O’Neil). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Walsh, G. (2014). Taming the monster: Violence, spectacle and the virtual animal. ANTENNAE: The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture, 30, 21–34.

Westerlaken, M., Gualeni, S. (2014). Felino: The Philosophical Practice of Making an Interspecies Videogame. The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, Istanbul. https://gamephilosophy.org/wp-content/uploads/confmanuscripts/pcg2014/Westerlaken_Gualeni-2014.-Felino_The-Philosophical-Practice-of-Making-an-Interspecies-Videogame.-PCG2014.pdf

Westerlaken, M., Gualeni, S. (2016). Situated Knowledges through Game Design: A Transformative Exercise with Ants. The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, Valletta. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/23364

BlueTwelve Studio (2022). Stray [PC]. Annapurna Interactive.

CD Projekt Red (2015). The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt [PC]. CD Projekt.

eduweb (2007). WolfQuest [PC]. Minnesota Zoo and eduweb.

Firaxis Games (2016). Sid Meier’s Civilization VI [PC]. 2K Games.

Frontier Developments (2003). Dog’s Life [PlayStation 2]. Sony Computer Entertainment.

Herobeat Studios (2022). Endling – Extinction is Forever [PC]. HandyGames.

House House (2019). Untitled Goose Game [PC]. Panic.

Might and Delight (2013). Shelter [PC]. Might and Delight.

Might and Delight (2015). Shelter 2 [PC]. Might and Delight.

Mighty Kingdom (2022). BBEE [PC]. Mighty Kingdom.

Rocksteady Studios (2009). Batman: Arkham Asylum [PC]. Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment.

Technically Finished (2009). Hærfest [PC]. Breda University of Applied Sciences Tripwire Interactive (2020). Maneater [PC]. Tripwire Interactive.

Varsav Game Studios (2019). Bee Simulator [PC]. Bigben Interactive.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mazur, Emilia. 2023. “Inhabiting Other Bodies – Animal Characters and Avatars”. Replay. The Polish Journal of Game Studies 10 (1): 63-83. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.10.04.