Teaching for Creativity: Mini-c, Little-c and Experiential Learning in College Classroom

Magdalena Grohman

doi:10.18778/2450-4491.07.06

Authors

Magdalena Grohman The University of Texas at Dallas, Center for Values in Medicine, Science, and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.07.06

Keywords:

creativity, mini-c, little-c, education, experiential learning, pedagogy

Abstract

The wave of changes in teaching approaches due to the introduction of the 21 century skills – including creativity and problem solving – has affected not only K through 12 classrooms, but also colleges and universities. Thompson (2014) suggests that when designing courses and curricula college educators should consider not only the content knowledge, skills and dispositions their students need to learn, but also what capacities ought to be developed and through what type of pedagogies. In this article, I propose that pedagogies of engagement are developed and used to teach content and skills in a college level course on Psychology of Creativity. In the main section of the article, I present three groups of creative assignments developed in collaboration with Dr. Heather Snyder: journal activities, creative project assignments, and creative problem-solving workshops. I argue that these assignments not only affect students’ motivation, engagement, and deep learning, but they also facilitate the development of mini-c and little-c creativity.

Author Biography

Magdalena Grohman, The University of Texas at Dallas, Center for Values in Medicine, Science, and Technology

Grohman Magdalena G. – her research background is in creative thinking, problem solving, and education. Her research and teaching interests revolve around creative problem solving, creativeness, and most recently around ethics in creative problem solving and design thinking. Dr Grohman is also an associate director of the Center for Values in Medicine, Science and Technology, UT Dallas. Dr Grohman has published several chapters and articles on creativity, both in Polish and English. She received her MA and PhD in psychology from the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland.

References

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2013, April) It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success, http://www.aacu.org/leap/public_opinion_research.cfm
Google Scholar

Beghetto R. A. (2006) Creative Self-Efficacy: Correlates in Middle and Secondary Students, “Creativity Reasearch Journal”, 18: 447–457.
Google Scholar

Beghetto R. A., Kaufman J. C. (2010) Broadening conceptions of creativity in the classroom in: Nurturing creativity in the classroom, R. A. Beghetto, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), Cambridge University Press: 191–205.
Google Scholar

Carkenord D. M. (1994) Promoting human factors psychology thinking through designassignments, “Teaching of Psychology”, 21: 235–237.
Google Scholar

Cisero C. A. (2006) Does reflective journal writing improve course performance?, “CollegeTeaching”, 54: 231–236.
Google Scholar

Connor-Greene P. A. (2000) Making connections: Evaluating the effectiveness of journal writing in enhancing student learning, “Teaching of Psychology”, 27: 44–46.
Google Scholar

Connor-Greene P. A., Young A., Paul C., Murdoch J. W. (2005) Poetry: It’s not just for English class anymore, “Teaching of Psychology”, 32: 215–221.
Google Scholar

Craft A. (2011) Creativity and education futures. Learning in a Digital Age, Sterling, Trentham.
Google Scholar

Dewey J. (1933 [1998]) How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar

Dewey J. (1938) Experience and education, Kappa Delta Pi.
Google Scholar

Domino G., Wechter V. T. (1976) Joint teaching of undergraduate courses in creativity, “Teaching of Psychology”, 3: 123–127.
Google Scholar

Edgerton R. (1997) Education white paper, Unpublished report for the Pew Charitable Trust.
Google Scholar

Garson Jr. A., Pianta R. C. (2017, September) Colleges need to be much more innovative with their curricula, https://www.insidehighered.com
Google Scholar

Grigorenko E. L., Jarvin L., Tan M., Sternberg R. J. (2008) Something new in the garden: Assessing creativity in academic domains, “Psychology Science Quarterly”, 50: 295–307.
Google Scholar

Grohman M. G., Szmidt K. J. (2013) Teaching for creativity: How to shape creative attitudes and skills in students and teachers in: Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity, M. B. Gregorson, H. T. Snyder, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company: 16–36.
Google Scholar

Hodges L. C. (2015) Teaching undergraduate science: A guide overcoming obstacles to student learning, Starling, VA: Sylus Publishing, LLC.
Google Scholar

Howard J. R. (2015) Discussion in the college classroom. Getting your students engaged and participating in person and online, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Brand.
Google Scholar

Huston T. (2009) Teaching what you don’t know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Itin C. M. (Fall, 1999) Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century, “The Journal of Experiential Education”, 22: 91–98.
Google Scholar

Isaksen S. G., Dorval K. B., Treffinger D. J. (2011) Creative approaches to problem solving. A framework for innovation and change (3rd Edition), SAGE Publications, Inc.
Google Scholar

Jeffrey B., Craft A. (2004) Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships, “Educational Studies”, 30 (1): 77–87.
Google Scholar

Kaufman J. C., Beghetto R. A. (2009) Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity, “Review of General Psychology”, 13: 1–12.
Google Scholar

Lang J. M. (2016) Small teaching. Everyday lessons from the science of learning, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley Brand.
Google Scholar

Malouff J. M., Hall L., Schutte N. S., Rooke S. E. (2010) Use of motivational teaching techniques and psychology student satisfaction, “Psychology Learning & Teaching”, 9: 39–44.
Google Scholar

Miller S. (1997) Self-knowledge as an outcome of application journal keeping in socialpsychology, “Teaching of Psychology”, 24: 124–125.
Google Scholar

Mills R. (2008) ʻIt’s just a nuisance’: Improving college student reflective journal writing, “College Student Journal”, 42: 684–690.
Google Scholar

Nęcka E. (2001) Psychologia Twórczości, Gdańsk, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Google Scholar

Partnership for 21 Century Skills (2008), http://www.p21.org Pekrun R., Goetz T., Titz W., Perry R. P. (2002) Academic emotions in students’ selfregulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research, “Educational Psychologist”, 37: 91–106.
Google Scholar

Sawyer R. K. (2010) Learning for creativity in: Nurturing creativity in the classroom, R. A. Beghetto, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), Cambridge University Press: 172–190.
Google Scholar

Sawyer R. K. (2012) Explaining Creativity. The Science of Innovation, (2nd edition), Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Sawyer K. (2013) Zig Zag: The surprising path to greater creativity, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar

Schneider C. G. (2009) Practicing liberal education: Formative themes in the reinvention of liberal learning, Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Google Scholar

Scott G., Leritz L., Mumford M. (2004) The effectiveness of creativity in training, A quantitative Review, “Creativity Research Journal”, 16: 261–388.
Google Scholar

Snyder H. T., Grohman M. G., Tomlinson M., Payette R. (2012, April) Creative selfefficacy and the creative project, Paper presented at APA Annual Convention. Orlando, FL.
Google Scholar

Snyder H. T. (2013) Designing creative assignments: Example of journal assignments and a creative project in: Teaching Creatively and Teaching Creativity, M. B. Gregerson, H. T. Snyder, J. C. Kaufman (eds.), NY: Springer Science + Business Media: 163–173.
Google Scholar

Stasiak M. K. (2005) Prawo studenta Wyższej Szkoły Humanistyczno-Ekonomicznej w Łodzi do dodatkowej wolności in: Trening twórczości w szkole wyższej, K. J. Szmidt (red.), Wyższa Szkoła Humanistyczno-Ekonomiczna w Łodzi: 59–80.
Google Scholar

Sternberg R. J., Dess N. K. (eds. Special Section) (2001) Creativity, “American Psychologist”, 56 (4): 332–362.
Google Scholar

Tatarkiewicz W. (1982), Dzieje sześciu pojęć, Wrocław, Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Thompson Jr. R. J. (2014) Beyond reason and tolerance: The purporse of higher education, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Towsend E. (2018) Journal Entry #10. Psychology of Creativity, PSY3355, UT Dallas, April 30.
Google Scholar

World Economic Forum. (2016, January), The future of jobs, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs; (20.03.2018).
Google Scholar

Yoder J. D., Hochevar C. M. (2005) Encouraging active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations, “Teaching of Psychology”, 32 (2): 91–95.
Google Scholar