This is an outdated version published on 2023-12-30. Read the most recent version.

The Brazil-Poland Double Tax Convention in the Context of the Countries’ Contemporary Tax Treaty Policy and Practice

Authors

  • Ziemowit Kukulski Head of the Tax Law Department, Head of the Centre of Tax Documentation and Studies, University of Lodz, Faculty of Law and Administration image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2023.04.02

Keywords:

Brazil, Poland, bilateral comprehensive tax treaty, Multilateral Convention (the MLI), OECD Model, UN Model, tax treaty policy and practice

Abstract

This paper deals with the Brazil-Poland double tax convention for the elimination of double taxation with respect to taxes on income and the prevention of tax evasion and avoidance, signed on 20th September, 2022, in the context of contemporary Brazil’s and Poland’s tax treaty policy and practice. The Author analyses its main features in comparison to Brazil’s and Poland’s positions to the MLI and changes introduced to the OECD and UN Models in 2017. Tax treaty provisions relevant to both countries’ tax treaty policies and practices are also examined. The study concentrates around the research question whether the BR-PL DTC fits into the countries’ contemporary tax treaty policy and practice or whether it is a unique bilateral tax treaty with specific features creating a sui generis pattern for tax treaties: for Brazil – with other OECD Member States and for Poland – with other South American states.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Báez Moreno A., Because Not Always B Comes after A: Critical Reflections on the New Article 12B of the UN Model on Automated Digital Services, “World Tax Journal” 2021, no. 11.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923508

Báez Moreno A., The Taxation of Technical Services under the United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention: A Rushed – Yet Appropriate – Proposal for (Developing) Countries?, “World Tax Journal” 2015, vol. 7, no. 3, https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5503651/mod_resource/content/0/Andres%20Baez%20-%20wtj_2015_03_int_2.pdf (access: 13.08.2023).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/3r66pf1

Bianco J.F., Principal Purpose Test in Brazilian Tax Treaties, https://www.ibdt.org.br/RDTIA/n-7-2020/principal-purpose-test-in-brazilian-tax-treaties/ (access: 8.08.2023).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-7155-rdtia-n7-12

Colucci F., Brazil’s Responses to BEPS – Implementation Through the Double Taxation Agreement with Argentina, https://www.machadomeyer.com.br/en/recent-publications/publications/tax/brazil-s-responses-to-beps-implementation-through-the-double-taxation-agreement-with-argentina (access: 9.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Franczak A., Multilateral Convention (MLI) – The Evolution or Revolution?, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2018, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 9 et seq., https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2018.27.2.9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2018.27.2.9

Jamroży M., Metody unikania podwójnego opodatkowania w świetle wielostronnej konwencji implementującej środki traktatowego prawa podatkowego, “Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne” 2018, vol. 107.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.26485/SPE/2018/107/1

Justification to the Act ratifying the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, done at in Paris on 24 November 2016, the Sejm paper no. 1776, Warsaw, 18 July 2017 (Uzasadnienie do projektu ustawy ratyfikującej Konwencję wielostronną implementującą środki prawa traktatowego mające na celu zapobieganie erozji podstawy opodatkowania i przenoszenia zysku, sporządzonej w Paryżu 24 listopada 2016 r., druk sejmowy nr 1776, Warszawa, 18 lipca 2017 r.), pp. 45–47, 56–57, https://orka.sejm.gov.pl/Druki8ka.nsf/0/39B2431FBC225D03C12581670038E84D/%24File/1776.pdf (access: 10.08.2021).
Google Scholar

Kukulski Z., Art. 6 Konwencji Wielostronnej jako dyrektywa wykładni umów o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania, [w:] Prawo podatkowe w systemie prawa. Międzygałęziowe związki norm i instytucji prawnych, A. Kaźmierczyk, A. Franczak (eds.), Warszawa 2019.
Google Scholar

Kukulski Z., Eliminacja podwójnego opodatkowania opłat za usługi techniczne w świetle art. 12A Konwencji Modelowej ONZ – rozwiązanie problemu czy źródło nowych sporów interpretacyjnych? “Przegląd Prawa Publicznego” 2022, no. 4.
Google Scholar

Kukulski Z., Konwencja Modelowa OECD i Konwencja Modelowa ONZ w polskiej praktyce traktatowej, Wolters Kluwer a business, Warszawa 2015.
Google Scholar

Kukulski Z., Nowa bilateralna umowa podatkowa Polski z Gruzją w świetle stanowiska Polski i Gruzji wobec Konwencji Wielostronnej oraz aktualizacji Konwencji Modelowej OECD i Konwencji Modelowej ONZ z 2017 r., “Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2021, no. 4.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2021.04.03

Kukulski Z., Praktyka traktatowa państw BRICS a bilateralne umowy podatkowe z Polską, “Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2015, no. 3.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2015.03.01

Kukulski Z., Protokół zmieniający bilateralną umowę podatkową Polski z Holandią w świetle stanowiska Polski do Konwencji Wielostronnej (MLI) oraz aktualizacji Konwencji Modelowej OECD w sprawie podatku od dochodu i majątku z 2017 r., “Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2020, no. 1.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2020.01.04

Litwińczuk H., Międzynarodowe prawo podatkowe, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2020.
Google Scholar

Martin J., UN releases updated model tax treaty adding new technical services fees article, https://mnetax.com/un-releases-updated-model-tax-treaty-adding-new-technical-service-fees-article-27765 (access: 13.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Nowak-Piechota A., Barwaniec A., Transformation of Tax System in Poland – 25 years of experience and future challenges, [in:] Transformation of Tax Systems in the CEE and BRICS Countries – 25 years of experience and future challenges, W. Nykiel, Z. Kukulski (eds.), Fundacja CDSP, Łódź 2018.
Google Scholar

OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project: Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of the Permanent Establishment Status. Action 7 – 2015 Final Report, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264241220-en.pdf?expires=1691758966&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=DD1F02F7E9EA60784EB131A740357EB8 (access: 11.08.2023).
Google Scholar

OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital. Condensed version – 2017 and Key Features of Member Countries 2018, A. Cracea (ed.), IBFD Publications, Amsterdam 2018, https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/oecd-approves-2017-update-model-tax-convention.htm (access: 8.08.2023).
Google Scholar

OECD, Signatories and Parties to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, http://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/beps-mli-signatories-and-parties.pdf (access: 10.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Raińczuk M., Leconte M., Konwencja Wielostronna – wpływ na umowy o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania zawarte przez Polskę, “Przegląd Podatkowy” 2018, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Republic of Poland: Status of List of Reservations and Notifications upon Deposit of the Instrument of Ratification, https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/beps-mli-position-poland-instrument-deposit.pdf (access: 10.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Reservations and notifications under the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures io Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting – Georgia, deposited on 29 March 2019, https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/beps-mli-position-georgia-instrument-deposit.pdf (access: 14.08.2023).
Google Scholar

The Netherlands (submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands in respect of the Netherlands) – Status of List of Reservations and Notifications upon Deposit of the Instrument of Acceptance, deposited on 29 March 2019, https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/beps-mli-position-netherlands-instrument-deposit.pdf (access: 14.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Tomaleza R., Brazil’s absence from the Multilateral BEPS Convention and the new amending protocol signed between Brazil and Argentina, http://kluwertaxblog.com/2017/09/05/brazils-absence-multilateral-beps-convention-new-amending-protocol-signed-brazil-argentina/ (access: 7.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Trindade Marinho A., Transformation of Tax System in Brazil – 25 years of experience and future challenges, [in:] Transformation of Tax Systems in the CEE and BRICS Countries – 25 years of experience and future challenges, W. Nykiel, Z. Kukulski (eds.), Fundacja CDSP, Łódź 2018.
Google Scholar

United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention Between Developed and Developing Countries 2017 Update, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York 2017, pp. XIII–XIV, https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MDT_2017.pdf (access: 8.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Wijen W., de Goede J., Alessi A., The Treatment of Services in Tax Treaties, “Bulletin for International Taxation” 2012, no. 1.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/2wm7nvs

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

Versions

How to Cite

Kukulski, Z. (2023). The Brazil-Poland Double Tax Convention in the Context of the Countries’ Contemporary Tax Treaty Policy and Practice. Tax Law Quarterly, (4), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.18778/1509-877X.2023.04.02

Issue

Section

Articles

PlumX metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)