Editorial: Qualitative Research – Methods, Participants, the Process of Implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.2.01Keywords:
qualitative research, reflexivity, researcher positionality, qualitative research participantsAbstract
The text presented serves as an introduction to the themed issue “Qualitative Research – Methods, Participants, Process of Implementation”. The first section of the text outlines the backdrop for the development of the volume, namely the dynamic changes in the field of qualitative research, the emergence of novel questions pertinent to the roles of the researcher and research participants, and the quest for new avenues for the implementation of research projects. The second part of the introduction features a succinct presentation of the articles that make up the volume. They derive from the methodological explorations of the contributing researchers and reflect their creative responses to the challenges arising at different stages of the research process. The articles collected in the volume showcase the diversity of the contemporary field of qualitative research.
References
Atkinson Paul (2005), Qualitative Research – Unity and Diversity, „Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 6(3), https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.4
Berger Roni (2015), Now I See it, Now I don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research, „Qualitative Research”, vol. 15(2), s. 219–234.
Bourke Brian (2014), Positionality: Reflecting on the Research Process, „The Qualitative Report”, vol. 19(33), s. 1–9.
Denzin Norman, Lincoln Yvonna (red.) (1994), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin Norman, Lincoln Yvonna (red.) (2005), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Third Edit, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin Norman, Lincoln Yvonna (red.) (2011), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Fourth Edit, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin Norman, Lincoln Yvonna, Giardina Michael, Cannella Gaile (red.) (2023), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sixth Edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Flick Uwe (2012), Projektowanie badania jakościowego, przełożył Paweł Tomanek, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Kafar Marcin, Kacperczyk Anna (red.) (2020), Autoetnograficzne „zbliżenia” i „oddalenia”: o autoetnografii w Polsce, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Knoblauch Hubert, Flick Uwe, Maeder Christoph (2005), Qualitative Methods in Europe: The Variety of Social Research, „Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 6(3), https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.3
Konecki Krzysztof (2018), Advances in Contemplative Social Research, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Konecki Krzysztof (2021), The Meaning of Contemplation for Social Qualitative Research: Applications and Examples, London: Routledge.
Mruck Katja, Cisneros Puebla César A., Faux Robert B. (2005), Editorial: About Qualitative Research Centers and Peripheries, „Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 6(3), https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.2
Palaganas Erlinda, Sanchez Marian, Molintas Ma. Visitacion, Caricativo Raul (2017), Reflexivity in Qualitative Research: A Journey of Learning, „The Qualitative Report”, vol. 22(2), s. 426–438, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2552
Silverman David (2007), Interpretacja danych jakościowych, przełożyły Małgorzata Głowacka-Grajper, Joanna Ostrowska, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Travers Max (2009), New Methods, Old Problems: A Sceptical View of Innovation in Qualitative Research, „Qualitative Research”, vol. 9(2), s. 161–179.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-07-10 (2)
- 2024-05-31 (1)
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
