This is an outdated version published on 2024-02-28. Read the most recent version.

Autonomous or Controlled? On the Motivation of Platform Workers in the Work-on-Demand System in Poland

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.1.06

Keywords:

platform work, self-determination theory, work motivation

Abstract

Working via platforms on-demand – in addition to positive features such as flexible working hours and the ease of entry and exit – also has negative features: a high level of job insecurity, low and uncertain wages, or the influence of algorithms whose rules we do not know. Despite this, more and more people are taking up this occupation. Using Deci and Ryan’s theory of self-determination, the article answers the question of what motivational factors explain taking up offline platform work. Research conducted among couriers and drivers working via apps in Poland shows that there are two types of motivation involved: autonomous and controlled. However, autonomous motivation prevails in this case over controlled motivation, which is manifested in the satisfaction of the need for autonomy, competence, and connection with others by doing platform work.

Author Biography

  • Dominika Polkowska, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

    Doktor habilitowana, socjolożka, zastępczyni dyrektora Instytutu Socjologii Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie. Jej zainteresowania naukowe koncentrują się wokół socjologii pracy i stosunków przemysłowych. Od kilku lat prowadzi badania dotyczące pracy platformowej w kontekście zatrudnienia prekarnego (w tym migrantów) i nowych uregulowań prawnych na poziomie Unii Europejskiej. Wykorzystuje głównie badania jakościowe. Kierowniczka kilku projektów międzynarodowych.

References

Cramer Judd, Krueger Alan B. (2016), Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber, „American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings”, vol. 106(5), s. 177–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161002

De Stefano Valerio (2016), The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’, „ILO Working Papers”, no. 994899823402676, International Labour Organisation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602

Deci Edward L., Ryan Richard M. (1985), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, New York: Plenum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Deci Edward L., Ryan Richard M. (2000), The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior, „Psychological Inquiry”, vol. 11(4), s. 227–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dunn Michael (2020), Making gigs work: digital platforms, job quality and worker motivations, „New Technology, Work and Employment”, vol. 35(2), s. 232–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12167

Eurofound (2023), Gender differences in motivation to engage in platform work, https://eige.europa.eu/publications-resources/publications/gender-differences-motivation-engage-platform-work?language_content_entity=en (dostęp: 7.07.2023).

European Commission (b.r.), Platform work and the “gig economy”: the JRC COLLEEM surveys of digital labour platforms, https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/scientific-activities-z/employment/platform-work_en (dostęp: 7.07.2023).

Fabo Brian, Beblavý Miroslav, Kilhoffer Zachary, Lenaerts Koen (2017), An Overview of European Platforms: Scope and Business Models, Joint Research Centre: Science for Policy Report, Brussels: European Commission.

Flick Uwe (2010), Projektowanie badania jakościowego, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Fusch Patricia, Ness Lawrence R. (2015), Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research, „The Qualitative Report”, vol. 20(9), s. 1408–1416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281

Gagné Marylene, Deci Edward L. (2005), Self-determination theory and work motivation, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, vol. 26(4), s. 331–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322

Hakim Catherine (1991), Grateful slaves and self-made women: Fact and fantasy in women’s work orientations, „European Sociological Review”, vol. 7(2), s. 101–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036590

Harmon Ellie, Silberman M. Six (2019), Rating Working Conditions on Digital Labor Platforms, „Computer Supported Cooperative Work”, vol. 28, s. 911–960.

Hauben Harald, Lenaerts Karolien, Waeyaert Willem (2020), The platform economy and precarious work, Luxembourg: Publication for European Parliament.

Hua Julietta, Kasturi Ray (2018), Beyond the Precariat: Race, Gender, and Labor in the Taxi and Uber Economy, „Social Identities”, vol. 24(2), s. 271–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1321721

Huws Ursula, Spencer Neil H., Syrdal Dag S. (2018), Online, on call: the spread of digitally organised just-in-time working and its implications for standard employment models, „New Technology, Work and Employment”, vol. 33(2), s. 113–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12111

Jabagi Nura, Croteau Anne-Marie, Audebrand Luc K., Marsan Josianne (2019), Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks, „Journal of Managerial Psychology”, vol. 34, s. 192–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0255

Kalleberg Arne L., Dunn Michael (2016), Good Jobs, Bad Jobs in the Gig Economy, „Perspective on Work”, vol. 20(2), s. 10–14.

Kashyap Rina, Anjali Bhatia (2018), Taxi Drivers and Taxidars: A Case Study of Uber and Ola in Delhi, „Journal of Developing Societies”, vol. 34(2), s. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X18757144

Kaufmann Nicolas, Schulze Thimo, Veit Daniel (2011), More than fun and money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing – A Study on Mechanical Turk, „AMCIS”, vol. 340, s. 1–11.

Kim Namwon, Kyuhan Lee, Jaehwan Lee, Jihae Suh (2023), The motivation to work in an online platform economy money-view or self-view?, „Current Psychology”, 6 July. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04885-7

Kowalik Zuzanna, Lewandowski Piotr, Kaczmarczyk Paweł (2023), Job quality gaps between migrant and native gig workers: evidence from Poland, “IZA Discussion Paper Series”, no. 16216, s. 1–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4471349

Malin Brenton, Curry Chandler (2017), Free to Work Anxiously: Splintering Precarity Among Drivers for Uber and Lyft, „Communication, Culture and Critique”, vol. 10(2), s. 382–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12157

Meszmann Tibor, Podgórska Karolina, Kolasa-Nowak Agnieszka (2022), Bargaining for working conditions and social rights of migrant workers in Central and Eastern European countries, Bratislava: Central European Labour Studies Institute.

Mrozowicki Adam, Czarzasty Jan (2020), Oswajanie niepewności. Studia społeczno-ekonomiczne nad młodymi pracownikami sprekaryzowanymi, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Muldoon James, Apostolidis Paul (2023), ‘Neither work nor leisure’: Motivations of microworkers in the United Kingdom on three digital platforms, „New Media & Society”, 12 July. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231183942

Muszyński Karol, Pulignano Valeria, Domecka Markieta, Mrozowicki Adam (2021), Coping with precarity during COVID‐19: A study of platform work in Poland, „International Labour Review”, vol. 161(3), s. 463–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12224

Norlander Peter, Jukic Nenad, Varma Arup, Nestorov Svetlozar (2021), The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: organizational control and motivation of Uber, taxi, and limousine drivers, „The International Journal of Human Resource Management”, vol. 32(19), s. 4053–4077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1867614

Pesole Annarosa, Urzí Brancati Cesira, Fernández Macías Enrique, Biagi Federico, González Vázquez Ignacio (2018), Platform Workers in Europe, Luxembourg: Office of the European Union.

Peticca-Harris Amanda, DeGama Nadia, Ravishankar M.N. (2020), Postcapitalist Precarious Work and Those in the ‘Drivers’ Seat: Exploring the Motivations and Lived Experiences of Uber Drivers in Canada, „Organization”, vol. 27(1), s. 36–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418757332

Pichault François, McKeown Tui (2019), Autonomy at work in the gig economy: analysing work status, work content and working conditions of independent professionals, „New Technology, Work and Employment”, vol. 34(1), s. 59–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12132

Polkowska Dominika (2019), Does the App Contribute to the Precarization of Work? A Case of Uber Drivers in Poland, „Partecipazione e Conflitto”, vol. 12(3), s. 717–741.

Polkowska Dominika (2021), Platform work during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of Glovo couriers in Poland, „European Societies”, vol. 23(supl), s. S321–S331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1826554

Porter Lyman W., Lawler III Edward E. (1968), Managerial attitudes and performance, Homewood: Irwin-Dorsey.

Ravenelle Alexandrea J. (2019), Hustle and Gig. Struggling and Surviving in The Sharing Economy, Oakland: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520971899

Rodgers Gerry, Rodgers Janine (1989), Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe, Geneva: ILO.

Rosenblat Alex (2018), Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work, Oakland: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520970632

Rosenblat Alex, Stark Luke (2016), Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers, „International Journal of Communication”, vol. 10, s. 3758–3784.

Ryan Richard M., Connell James (1989), Perceived locus of causality and internalization – examining reasons for acting in two domains, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, vol. 57(5), s. 749–761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.749

Ryan Richard M., Deci Edward L. (2017), Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, New York: Guilford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

Schor Juliet B., Attwood-Charles William, Cansoy Mehmet, Ladegaard Isak, Wengronowitz Robert (2020), Dependence and precarity in the platform economy, „Theory and Society”, vol. 49, s. 833–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y

Umer Hamza (2021), Illusory freedom of physical platform workers: Insights from Uber Eats in Japan, „The Economic and Labour Relations Review”, vol. 32(3), s. 437–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304621992466

Ustawa z dnia 6 września 2001 r. o transporcie drogowym (tekst jedn. Dz.U. z 2022 r., poz. 2201 ze zm.).

Vosko Leah, Zukewich Nancy, Cranford Cynthia (2003), Precarious jobs: A new typology of employment, „Perspectives on Labour and Income”, vol. 15(4), s. 16–26.

Vroom Victor H. (1964), Work and motivation, New York: Wiley.

Wood Alex (2019), The Taylor Review: Understanding the gig economy, dependency and the complexities of control, „New Technology, Work and Employment”, vol. 34(2), s. 111–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12131

Wood Alex (2020), Despotism on Demand. How Power Operates in the Flexible Workplace, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501748875.001.0001

Wood Alex, Graham Mark, Lehdonvirta Vili, Hjorth Isis (2019), Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy, „Work, Employment and Society”, vol. 33(1), s. 56–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Wojtowicz Ewa (2014), Motywowanie do szczęścia poprzez wspieranie autonomii dziecka – perspektywa autodeterminacji, „Kwartalnik Naukowy”, nr 3, s. 29–37.

Zwysen Wouter, Piasna Agnieszka (2023), Juggling Online Gigs with Offline Jobs: How Local Labour Markets Are Driving the Growth in Internet and Platform Work, „ETUI Research Paper – Working Paper”, no. 02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4401054

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

Versions

Issue

Section

Numer regularny

How to Cite

Polkowska, Dominika. 2024. “Autonomous or Controlled? On the Motivation of Platform Workers in the Work-on-Demand System in Poland”. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 20 (1): 102-23. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.20.1.06.