Acting for the Local Community: Hybrid Ethnography in the Careers of Local Culture Animators

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.17.3.09

Keywords:

culture animator, diary method, hybrid ethnography, spatial analysis, social role, career

Abstract

This article focuses on the innovative methodology used to collect data. We describe how we have utilized the diary method and what analytical potential it contains. We also flag the limitations we have perceived during the research. At the same time, so as not to refrain entirely from a discussion of the study findings, we recreate selected shared attributes in the careers of culture animators. A hybrid research method was used to report and interpret the reality of our surroundings. This involved the use of a diary in which the animators described facts and events from the previous day while also plotting data concerning their location on the Google map; they enriched their notes with short essays, pictures, and video clips. Then, the animators as subjects in the research took part in one-on-one in-depth interviews to summarize their experience. Deliberations on the utility and innovativeness of these ethnographic methods are accompanied by considerations as to the variety of experience held by culture animators and the factors driving their occupational choices.

Author Biographies

  • Rafał Wiśniewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, National Centre for Culture, Poland

    Rafał Wiśniewski, sociologist, cultural manager; Director of the National Centre for Culture, professor at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw; does research and publishes on the sociology of culture and intercultural communication.

  • Grażyna Pol, National Centre for Culture, Poland

    Grażyna Pol, graduate of sociology at the University of Warsaw; Deputy Director of the Department of Research and Analysis at the National Centre for Culture. The author’s research interests focus on the methodology of social sciences and the sociology of culture.

References

Bales Kevin 1994. Early innovations in social research: the Poverty Survey of Charles Booth (PhD). London School of Economics.

Becker, Howard S. and James Carper. 1956. “The Development of Identification with an Occupation.” The American Journal of Sociology 61:289-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/221759

Blau Peter M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life New York: Wiley.

Bucholc, Marta. 2018. Miejsce poza pojemnikiem. Wstęp do polskiego wydania Socjologii przestrzeni Martiny Löw. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Press.

Cialdini, Robert. 1995. Wywieranie wpływu na ludzi: teoria i praktyka. Gdansk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Domecka, Markieta and Adam Mrozowicki. 2008. “Robotnicy i ludzie biznesu. Wzory karier zawodowych a zmiana społeczna in Poland.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 4(1):136-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.4.1.06

Dudkiewicz, Magdalena and Marek Dudkiewicz. 2017. Raport z badania liderów kultury w subregionie radomskim. Warsaw: Fundacja Obserwatorium.

Fatyga, Barbara. 2014. “Cultural animator [Animator kultury].” In Słownik Teorii Żywej Kultury. Retrieved September 15, 2020 http://ozkultura.pl/wpis/2800/5

Ferenc, Tomasz. 2001. “Socjologia obrazu, socjologia fotografii - praktyki badawcze.” Przegląd Socjologiczny/ Sociological Review 50(2):81-99.

Fuller, Martin G. and Martina Löw. 2017. “Introduction: An invitation to spatial sociology.” Pp. 469-491 in Current Sociology Monograph 4/65. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117697461

Gibson, Barbara et al. 2013. “The Integrated Use of Audio Diaries, Photography, and Interviews in Research with Disabled Young Men.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12(1):382-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200118

Godlewski, Grzegorz et al. 2002. Animacja Kultury. Doświadczenie i przyszłość. Warsaw: Institute of Polish Culture at the University of Warsaw.

Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.

Gregory, Derek and John Urry, eds. 1985. Social Relations and Spatial Structures. London: Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7

Hall, Edward. 1976. Ukryty wymiar. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo PIW.

Homans, George. 1967. The nature of social science, New York.

Hughes, Everett C. 1958. Men and their work. Toronto: Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

Konecki, Krzysztof. 1988. “Praca w koncepcji socjologii interakcjonistycznej.” Studia Socjologiczne 1/1988:225-245.

Konecki, Krzysztof. 2012. “Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 8(1):12-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.8.1.02

Kozinets, Robert. 2006. “Netnography 2.0.” Pp. 129-142 in Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing, edited by R. Belk. Cheltenham, UN, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Krause, Ewa. 2012. Rozwój kariery zawodowej studentów. Konteksty i dokonania. Bydgoszcz: Publishing House of the Kazimierz Wielki University.

Krzysztofek, Kazimierz and Radosław Bomba. 2011. “Będziemy żyć pod cyfrowym niebem….” Culture and History 19/2011. Retrieved March 11, 2021 http://www.kulturaihistoria.umcs.lublin.pl/archives/2400

Latour, Bruno. 2010. Splatając na nowo to, co społeczne. Wprowadzenie do teorii aktora-sieci. Cracow: Universitas Publishing House.

Laughland, Andrew and Lia Kvavilashvili. 2018. “Should participants be left to their own devices? Comparing paper and smartphone diaries in psychological research.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7(4):552-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.002

Logan, John R. 2012. “Making a Place for Space: Spatial Thinking in Social Science.” Annual Review of Sociology 38:507-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145531

Löw, Martina. 2018. Socjologia przestrzeni. Warsaw: Publishing House of the University of Warsaw. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323533320

Malinowski, Bronisław. 2007. Dziennik w ścisłym znaczeniu tego wyrazu. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Literackie.

Nowak, Marek. 2015. Teoria nieracjonalnego działania. Socjologiczne studium na temat wolontariatu i społecznego aktywizmu. Poznan: Wydawnictwo UAM.

Nowosielski, Michał and Marek Nowak. 2008. Jak badać społeczeństwo obywatelskie? Doświadczenia praktyków. Poznan: Wydawnictwo UAM.

Nóżka, Marcjanna and Natalia Martini. 2015. “Metody mobilne i wizualne w praktyce badawczej: zastosowanie fotospaceru w socjologicznych badaniach map mentalnych i zachowań terytorialnych ludzi.” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 11(4):34-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.11.4.02

Olechnicki, Krzysztof. 1999. “Obraz i wizualność w naukach społecznych.” Kultura i społeczeństwo 3:39-71.

Ossowska, Maria. 2020. Ethos rycerski i jego odmiany. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Pink, Sarah. 2008. “Walking with video.” Visual Studies 22(3):240-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142

Poczykowski, Radosław. 2006. “Między socjologią a kartografią, czyli: mapa w głowie ER(R)GO.” Teoria–Literatura– Kultura 2(13):9-21.

Przybylski, Liz 2020. Hybrid Etnography. Online, Offline, and in Between. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Rodríguez-Amat, Joan R. and Cornelia Brantner. 2016. “Space and place matters: A tool for the analysis of geolocated and mapped protests.” SAGE- new media and society 6(18):1027-1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814552098

Seim, Josh. 2019. Hybrid Ethnography: Mixing Participant Observation and Observant Participation. Speech at a conference American Sociological Association.

Simmel, Georg. 1997. “The sociology of space.” Pp. 137-170 in Simmel on Culture, edited by D. Frisby and M. Featherstone. London: SAGE.

Stage, Carsten, Bridgit Eriksson, and Camilla M. Reestorf. 2019. “Understanding cultural participation through participation – inventiveness, multivalence and epistemic modernization.” Cultural Trends 1(29):19-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1692183

Stańczak, Gregory C., ed. 2007. Visual Research Methods Image, Society, and Representation. Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, London, Singapore: Sage Publications.

Šveda, Martin and Michala Madajová. 2015. “Merging diaries and GPS records: The method of data collection for spatio-temporal research.” Moravian Geographical Reports 2(23):12-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2015-0007

Weber, Max. 2002. Gospodarka i społeczeństwo. Warsaw: PWN.

Weber, Max. 2011. Etyka protestancka i duch kapitalizmu. Warsaw: University of Warsaw Publishing House. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323528135

Voilmy, Dimitri, Zbigniew Smoreda, and Cezary Ziemlicki. 2008. “Geolocation and Video Ethnography: Capturing Mobile Internet used by a Commuter.” Mobilities 3(2):201-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100802095304

Wiśniewski, Rafał 2012. “W przestrzeni kultury i natury. Kilka uwag wstępnych o praktykach społecznych i świadomości ekologicznej.” Politeja 20(2):155-169.

Wiśniewski, Rafał et al. 2021. Oswajając zmienność. Kultura lokalna z perspektywy domów kultury. Warsaw: National Centre for Culture.

Żuchowska-Zimnal, Gabriela. 2013. “Socjologia wizualna kluczem do (samo)poznania.” Półrocznik Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe 1(41):100-116.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Wiśniewski, Rafał, and Grażyna Pol. 2021. “Acting for the Local Community: Hybrid Ethnography in the Careers of Local Culture Animators”. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 17 (3): 164-83. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.17.3.09.