Critical Theory in Regressive Times: Liberalism, Global Populism and the “White Left” in the Twenty-First Century

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.34.05

Słowa kluczowe:

Critical Theory, social progress, regression, liberal left, populism, Habermas

Abstrakt

In this paper, I consider not only the crisis in conservative neoliberalism and free market economics, but a crisis of representation and plausibility in progressive new liberalism; a situation which leads to deadlock for progressivism in which things cannot progress. In order to address this state of crisis in the global perception of the “white left,” Critical Theory, as a mode of Western liberal thought, needs to rethink the direction of its own criticism. Additionally, Critical Theory needs to adjust its focus to respond to the deadlock presented by the rise of right-wing populism and the derogation of liberal values in these regressive times (I refer antonymically, here, to Jürgen Habermas’s use of the term “progressive”). The radical democratic ideal advocated by Habermas, comprising universal equality and emancipation, should still be the goal for liberalism, and for Critical Theory, but first of all, the achievements and advances liberal progressivism has already made need to be secured to prevent society from regressing. This does not mean making a choice between neoliberalism and authoritarianism, but that a new paradigm of thinking is due. I argue that universality is anterior to cultural pluralism, as are social topics to cultural issues, and justice of distribution to justice of identity. In the complex world of modernity, good things do not come together if there is conflict between desirable values, so choices need to be made: a ranking of real, material conditions is necessary, to ensure cohesion and progression.

Bibliografia

Adorno, Theodor W. Can One Live after Auschwitz? Edited by Rolf Tiedemann. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W. and Max Horkheimer. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Translated by John Cumming. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company, 1994.
Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Edited and Introduced by Hannah Arendt. Translated by Harry Zohn. London: Pimlico, 1999.
Google Scholar

Benoist, Alain de. “A Brief History of the Idea of Progress.” Translated by Greg Johnson. The Occidental Quarterly 8, no. 1 (Spring 2008): 7–16.
Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J., ed. Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.
Google Scholar

Brie, Michael and Claus Thomasberger, eds. Karl Polanyi’s Vision of Socialist Transformation. Montreal: Black Rose Books, 2018.
Google Scholar

Geiselberger, Heinrich. “The Great Regression: Preface of the Editor Heinrich Geiselberger.” The Great Regression. http://www.thegreatregression.eu/preface-of-the-editor/#fn4 (accessed: October 28, 2019).
Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from Political Writings. Vol. 1: 1910–1920, edited by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1977.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001

Habermas, Jürgen. Theory and Practice. Translated by John Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1 [Reason and the Rationalization of Society]. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1985.
Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2 [Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason]. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1985.
Google Scholar

Owen, David S. Between Reason and History: Habermas and the Idea of Progress. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2002)
Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2001.
Google Scholar

Zhang, Chenchen. “The Curious Rise of the ‘White Left’ as a Chinese Internet Insult.” Open Democracy (11 May 2017), https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/digitaliberties/curious-rise-of-white-left-as-chinese-internet-insult/ (accessed: October 26, 2019).
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2019-12-30

Jak cytować

Xingfu, W. (2019). Critical Theory in Regressive Times: Liberalism, Global Populism and the “White Left” in the Twenty-First Century. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, (34), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.34.05