Własności i prawa przyrody w esencjalizmie dyspozycyjnym
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.24.08Abstrakt
The aim of this paper is to articulate dispositonal essentialism (DE) as a viable position in the discussions considering properties and laws of nature. In the first part of the article there are given several "must have" trades of properties in DE. They are followed by the conceptions themselves. The last part of the article brings a little insight about ceteris paribus laws in DE.
Bibliografia
Armstrong D. 1983, What is a law of nature?, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171700
Armstrong D. 1996, Dispositions. a Debate, London.
Armstrong D. 1997, A world of states of affairs, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583308
Beebee H. 2002, Contingent laws rule: reply to Bird, [w:] „Analysis”, nr 62, s. 252–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/62.3.252
Bird A. 2001, Necessarily, salt dissolves in water, [w:] „Analysis”, nr 61, s. 267–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/61.4.267
Bird A. 2003., Resemblance Nominalism and counterparts, [w:] „Analysis”, nr 63, s. 221–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/63.3.221
Bird A. 2005a, Laws and essences, [w:] „Ratio”, nr 18, s. 437–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00304.x
Bird A. 2005b, The ultimate argument against Armstrong’s contingent necessitation view of laws, [w:] „Analysis”, nr 65, s. 147–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/65.2.147
Bird A. 2007, Nature’s metaphysics. Laws and properties, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227013.001.0001
Bird A. 2009, Essences and natural kinds, [w:] Le Poidevin R. I in (red.) Routledge companion to metaphysics, Abingdon, 497–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879306-52
Bostock S. 2003, Are all possible laws actual laws?, [w:] „Australasian Journal of Philosophy”, nr 81, s. 517–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713659759
Carroll J. 1994, Laws of nature, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619908
Ellis B., Lierse C. 1994, Dispositional essentialism, [w:] „Australasian Journal of Philosophy”, nr 72, s. 27–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345861
Goodman N. 1983/1955, Fact, fiction and forecast, wyd. IV, Cambridge.
Kripke S. 1977/1972, Identity and necessity, [w:] Naming, necessity and natural kinds, (red.) S. Schwartz, Ithaca and London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9
Lewis D. 1986, Philosophical papers, volume II, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001
Mumford S. 1995, Ellis and Lierse on dispositional essentialism, [w:] „Australasian Journal of Philosophy”, nr 73, s. 606–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409512346961
Odrowąż-Sypniewska J. 2006, Rodzaje naturalne. Rozważania z filozofii języka, Warszawa.
Psillos S. 2002, Salt does dissolve in water, but not necessarily, [w:] „Analysis”, nr 62, s. 255–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/62.3.255
Quine W. V. O. 1977/1969, Natural kinds, [w:] Naming, necessity and natural kinds, (red.) S. Stephen, Ithaca and London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1466-2_2
Russel B. 2001/1912, The problems of philosophy, Oxford.
Schaffer J. 2004, Two conceptions of sparse properties, [w:] „Pacific Philosophical Quarterly”, nr 85, s. 92–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00189.x
Wodzisz R. 2011, Analiza dyspozycji za pomocą okresów warunkowych, [w:] „Roczniki Filozoficzne”, Lublin (w przygotowaniu).
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Praca jest udostępniana na licencji Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Jak cytować
