Senses in Visual Arts as a Prism for Philosophy and Through the Prism of Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.41.01Słowa kluczowe:
senses/synaesthesia, painting, body, ontology, epistemology, metaphysics, fleshAbstrakt
The aim of this paper is to show how a sensory approach to visual arts can be relevant for philosophy and how this prism, once brought to philosophy, can give insights on art in return. I will try to demonstrate that the difference between modernity’s two main schools of thought (namely, materialism and idealism) can be understood – thanks to the model of painting as an allegory of the world – as an exclusive preference for one sense: touch for materialism and sight for idealism. Much as the two schools differ, both consider the painting (or the world) a finite picture, whose elements can be juxtaposed in a single homogeneous plane of knowledge devoid of any opacity. This leads to separate both vision and the mind from the body and from the world. As a result, sight and touch end up dissociated. That is why, to challenge this modern paradigm and renew with a holistic relationship to the world and to ourselves, philosophers and artists propose a shift towards a synaesthetic approach to painting. Such an approach will uncover a modality of being where the body, the subject, and the world, as well as sight and touch, can be reunited. Thus, I will show that Merleau-Ponty’s ontology of the flesh – that echoes through the paintings of artists who attempt to break free from the frame and engage the observer with all his senses and being, such as Racławice Panorama, Malevich, El Lissitzky, Cézanne or the Navajos’ sand paintings – can offer, thanks to a synaesthetic approach, both a new framework for philosophy and a new understanding of visual arts.
Bibliografia
Bergson, H. (2012). Matière et Mémoire. Paris: PUF.
Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (2005). Francis Bacon; The Logic of Sensation. Translated by D. W. Smith. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. Translated by P. J. Olscamp. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la methode pour bien conduire sa raison, & chercher la verité dans les sciences: plus la dioptrique, les meteores, et la geometrie, qui sont des essais de cete methode. Lejda: Jan Maire.
Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1985). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1–2. Translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805042
Kant, I. (1997). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649
Le Breton, D. (2017). Sensing the World: An Anthropology of the Senses. Translated by C. Ruschiensky. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2007). The Merleau-Ponty Reader. Edited by T. Toadvine and L. Lawlor. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by D. A. Landes. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720714
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2016). Le Visible et l’invisible. Paris: Les Éditions Gallimard.
Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1997). Perspective as Symbolic Form. Translated by Ch. S. Wood. New York: Zone Books.
Google Scholar
Plato (1997). Cratylus. In Plato, Complete Works. Edited by J. M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Translated by H. E. Barnes. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
