What do we call the children? Familial terms of address in Polish and English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0860-6587.26.31Keywords:
terms of address, children, cultural scripts, individualism, collectivism, teaching Polish as a foreign languageAbstract
The paper addresses cultural differences between Polish and English as they pertain to familial terms of address. Using corpus data, I demonstrate that Polish parents frequently address their children using hypocoristic forms of the terms syn ‘son’, córka ‘daughter’ and dziecko ‘child’. These forms convey affection and emphasize familial ties. English parents, on the other hand, use children’s names, nicknames, or terms of endearment. I argue that these differences follow from underlying contrasts in cultural scripts: English individualism and Polish warmth.
References
Anstatt T., 2003, Der polnische Vokativ: Aussterbende Kasusform oder produktiv verwendetes Wortbildungsmittel?, “Zeitschrift für Slawistik” 50, pp. 328–347.
Fernald A., 1985, Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese, “Infant Behavior and Development”, no. 8(2), pp. 181–195.
Gleitman L. R., Newport E. L. and Gleitman H., 1984, The current status of the motherese hypothesis, “Journal of Child Language”, no. 11, pp. 43–79.
Hall E. T., 1976, Beyond culture, New York.
Hock H. H., Joseph B. D., 1996, Language History, Language Change and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics, Berlin.
Markus H. R., Kitayama S., 1994, The Cultural Construction of Self and Emotion: Implications for Social Behavior, in: S. Kitayama, H. R. Markus (eds.), Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence, Washington D.C., pp. 89–130.
Matychuk P., 2005, The role of child-directed speech in language acquisition: a case study, “Language Sciences”, no. 27, pp. 301–379.
Nisbett R. E., 2003, The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently... and Why, New York.
Parrott L. A., 2010, Vocatives and Other Direct Address Forms: A Contrastive Study, in: A. Grønn, I. Marijanovic (eds.), Russian in Contrast, “Oslo Studies in Language”, no. 2, pp. 211–229.
Pyzik J., 2000, Przygoda z gramatyką: Fleksja i słowotwórstwo imion, Kraków.
Sun L., 2013, Culture teaching in foreign language teaching, “Theory and Practice in Language Studies”, no. 3(2), pp. 371–375.
Szymczak M., 1966, Nazwy stopni pokrewieństwa i powinowactwa rodzinnego w historii i dialektach języka polskiego, Warszawa.
Wierzbicka A., 1992, Semantics, Culture and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture- Specific Configurations, Oxford.
Wierzbicka A., 1999, Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals, Cambridge.
Yokoyama O., 1994, Iconic manifestations of interlocutor distance in Russian, “Journal of Pragmatics”, no. 22, pp. 83–102.
Zaleski J., 1963, Rozwój form wołacza żeńskich rzeczowników osobowych typu Marysia, Anulka, paniusia,“Onomastica”, no. 8, pp. 261–291.
British National Corpus (BNC) http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ [28.08.2019].
Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego (NKJP) http://nkjp.uni.lodz.pl/index.jsp [28.08.2019].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
